David's Avatar

David

@ritzcharlton.bsky.social

Irish renewable energy professional.

59 Followers  |  566 Following  |  23 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024  |  2.1188

Latest posts by ritzcharlton.bsky.social on Bluesky

We should block them from accessing RTE Player, see how they like it

02.04.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Nowhere hopefully... just so people can sit on a bus scrolling through HD videos? We don't need it

10.12.2024 08:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks for sharing, the scale of energy demad growth is shocking

10.12.2024 08:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Source: BloombergNEF

09.12.2024 15:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Energy-related emissions and net-zero carbon budget, Economic Transition Scenario and Net Zero Scenario

Energy-related emissions and net-zero carbon budget, Economic Transition Scenario and Net Zero Scenario

We have a lot of work to do...
#energysky

09.12.2024 14:51 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But significantly higher degradation with perovskite at the moment I belive? Can that be solved?

04.12.2024 23:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Just surprised that a modern highly insulated/air tight house with underfloor heating wouldn't be top of the list. Like, if you're working with radiators, you've got a challenge straight away.

Is there anything special about that system that gives an extra efficiency boost?

03.12.2024 16:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

How is that possible? A high performing system would need low flow temperatures which is not normally conducive to poor insulation and smaller emmiters..

How are they achieving such a high performance?

03.12.2024 15:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I loved @davidcebon.bsky.social 's crystallisation of how eliminate the vast amount of grid carbon emissions.

1. Build in flexibility
2. Focus on 1-3 day storage
3. Strengthen regional interconnection
4. Address the dunkelflautes with gas peakers

Seems doable

#energysky

pca.st/episode/de24...

03.12.2024 12:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Or we're all fucked, I don't know.

30.11.2024 17:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But maybe the story of civilization is this: we burned through millions of years of stored sunlight in a wild century of soaring living standardsβ€” realised our folly, then leveraged that power to build a future that runs on sunlight as it arrives.

30.11.2024 17:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Was humanity ever going to stick to hunting whales, gathering firewood, and digging ancient bat guano forever? Once we unlocked fossil fuels, our binge was inevitable. #energysky

30.11.2024 17:41 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

How is frozen concentrated orange juice doing?

27.11.2024 23:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

*cheapest form of energy (not just renewable)

27.11.2024 09:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Totally. Anyway, the good news is that in most areas solar PV is already the cheapest form of renewable energy in history!

27.11.2024 09:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think efficiency is the only real lever on that list- Say commercially available modules get to 30%.... MW for MW that would mean roughly 1/3 less modules shipped and handled,
less land needed and savings on other materials.... potentially a large impact on LCOE but nowhere near €2/MWh! (IMHO)

26.11.2024 23:41 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Fair point. The graph does seem to chime with recent experience though... e.g rapid fall in module price in the last decade which seems to have flatened somewhat more recently. With land, labour and other costs having less scope... not seeing where a dramatic LCOE improvement would come from

26.11.2024 17:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Doesn't look like the direction of travel

26.11.2024 15:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ahhhh.... which was my original question! πŸ˜†

24.11.2024 14:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But but.... if "the heat loss stays the same" then the equation is unbalanced. Where does the 6kW of extra boiler heat go if the heat loss stays at 2kW?

(Sorry to nitpick but i cant help it, I like your videos, the seesaw was a great and easy to understand analogy)

24.11.2024 13:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ha, yes it literally translates wind lull, or something similar. There's a storm outside at the moment πŸ˜€

24.11.2024 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But then the temperature inside would rise, along with the heat loss?

24.11.2024 00:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Great video, thanks. What's causing the additional heatloss in scenario 2? More boiler start/stop and flue gas loses to maintain the 21 degree set point?

23.11.2024 13:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@ritzcharlton is following 19 prominent accounts