The ANGELIX System 🔞&

[C] utterly horrific

DELTARUNE for Nintendo Switch, PC / Mac, and PlayStation UNDERTALE's parallel story, DELTARUNE. Meet new and old characters in a tale that steps closer to its end, chapter by chapter. Dodge bullets in nonviolent RPG battles as you listen to funky, funky mus...

THE THIRD EPISODE.

THE FOURTH FATE.

deltarune.com

SO THEN.

WILL YOU PARTAKE ONCE MORE?

HOW LONG

IT HAS BEEN.

🟩 me omw to leave out a gastergram:

I CAN FEEL IT

QUICKENING NOW.

HOW LUCKY WE ARE

TO NEED EACH OTHER IN THIS WAY.

OUR BEAUTIFUL

CONNECTION.

TREMBLES.

AND YET,

NO MATTER HOW MUCH TIME PASSES,

IT STILL

DAYS

THAT FELT

LIKE YEARS.

YEARS

THAT FELT

LIKE DAYS.

a close up of a cat 's face with a blurred background . ALT: a close up of a cat 's face with a blurred background .

blow up explode nyaboom powie

probons

called it lmao

im like a cat if the cat said bruh instead of meow :3332333

man it sucks when former ytp'ers became alt-right figureheads to some extent, but it REALLY feels great when former ytp'ers come out as trans on the internet and get yelled at by their alt-right fanbase for becoming one of them querrs🤢

and yes i am just now learning fawful is a girl stfu im slow

Fascism successfully mentioned, I'm done. 😅

So we're all on the same boat here. All the -genics are valid. And I'm fucking tired. Tired of typing this shit. Tired of syscourse, tired of the pointless drama, tired of anti-intellectualism and facism and all that other shit that us Demonic Wok EssJayDubyas hate so much.

So this is my somewhat solid reasoning against ALL FOUR points. Yes, even the second one: Plurality in non-disordered systems may not be well-studied, but as stated it's not a disorder, it's a difference. And difference is normal. Not "quirky" like what some might think.

Mental illness isn't an illness. It's a difference.
Mental difference... hmm, now where have I seen this terminology before? (the word "neurodivergence" slowly fades and zooms in on screen)

Gee, I wonder.

Now, this may look like faulty logic, but let me ask yous this: What the fuck is the difference between autism and plurality in the grand scheme?
Like, sure, they ARE different diagnoses, but as stated before, modern diagnosis is heavily flawed in that it over-generalizes wayyy too often.

Plurality = mental illness: true.
Autism = mental illness: true.

Autism = a spectrum: true.
Plurality = a spectrum: false.

If they are, then autism is being appropriated by a staggering amount of the population!

(It's not. It's literally recognized as a spectrum disorder by most psychologists.)

So here we have a damning contradiction that many collectives refuse to acknowledge:

But scroll back. The autism thing kind of blows this out of the water, right?
So-called "OSDD/DID collectives" (which are valid, but the term is also commonly appropriated by sysmedicalist collectives) claim that endogenic systems are appropriating a mental illness...

DID is not monolithic. Autism is not monolithic... hey, wait! That's commonly believed to be a mental illness! Well, the term is neurodivergence now... but that's a good thing in my opinion!
To put it simply: diagnoses are just harmful catch-all labels made by lazy people. Everyone is different.

Now, the fact that so often we see people complain about how you're doing the mental illness wrong, shows a lack of understanding of how brains work. There is no one way to be trans... but there is also no one way to be anything.

4. Is mental illness "real?" There's a lot of definitions we could use here to describe "reality". But even then, I say it's a load of bullshit. There have been many videos on the subject of self-diagnosis and how YOU(S) know your brain better than anyone.

3. And of course there's the obvious comparison to transmedicalism that many trans sysmeds like to shield themselves from by saying "being transgender isn't a mental illness, DID is." Aside from the ignorance of non-disordered systems, it also reinforces how these peoples think about the next point:

2. Since endogenic plurality has more recently been brought into the public eye, the studies are still ongoing. Even if nothing proves endos exist, nothing proves they DON'T.

1. It's not "appropriation of an illness." I've seen many collectives shit out this same rhetoric. See point 4 for why I believe this is... for lack of a better word, a bad take.

Now... for the OTHER part I want to get off my chest.

There's a few talking points that I just want to get down in text, which I shall list in the following replies: