Chart v similar tho!
12.12.2025 11:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@jmackin2.bsky.social
Writer of Streetwise column in the Wall Street Journal www.wsj.com/streetwise Here for FinTwit c. 2012. Ex FT
Chart v similar tho!
12.12.2025 11:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0BT
12.12.2025 10:31 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Tl;dr: π€·ββοΈπ€·ββοΈπ€·ββοΈ
12.12.2025 09:36 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And it really worked: now you can speak fluently about convexity and use all the Greeks
12.12.2025 09:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Price not quantity amirite?
11.12.2025 21:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Feedback loop from new policy rate/bill buying to encourage more fiscal incontinence, boosting inflation and making the rate wrong?
11.12.2025 21:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Now do Austrian 100yr zero... haven't looked recently but the 100yr duration did really really bad things when yield jumped a violent of hundred bps
11.12.2025 20:42 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Indeed. But given their choice of beer is either a lager shandy masquerading as beer or a 9%+ IPA without a strength label, downing even a mini-US pint is a risky business
11.12.2025 10:28 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0*his
11.12.2025 10:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0He downed is 568ml in one
11.12.2025 10:25 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Not QE. So is "monetization" ok?
10.12.2025 19:37 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0192.168.1.254 ftw
10.12.2025 13:23 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Need a font/disability expert.
10.12.2025 08:46 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Is this about the official "strings attached" or the signalling? An obviously strong bank can take CB money without scaring its investors, explaining it as arbitrage. A weak one might confirm its weakness?
10.12.2025 08:45 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Ah I see, claims that sans is easier for people with dyslexia
10.12.2025 08:39 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0How is it a "diversity move"? Diversity of fonts?
10.12.2025 08:35 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Surely Boom has the same issue? (Cool factoid btw!)
09.12.2025 21:15 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But but but if they can build them from scratch, why can't Siemens or GE build a new factory from scratch amd be just as quick with new supply?
09.12.2025 21:08 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I think you mean πππ
09.12.2025 20:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes, I was amused by the range cited - 0.1% to 3.4% annually is best captured by a shrug emoji
09.12.2025 17:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Whereas the problem with going 'we will have the old Labour right's approach to social issues BUT we are going to do Old Labour economic policies to make it up to our left flank' is that Labour voters are repelled by the social issues and the economic policies don't work!
08.12.2025 16:46 β π 64 π 15 π¬ 3 π 1TBF, neither OBR nor the people touting the higher figure should even call this a guesstimate. We have no clue how good or not AI will be in 5 years - range of poss outcomes is huge, and distribution of possibilities not even known.
08.12.2025 15:46 β π 6 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Very poor language then. But poor language is not my main criticism of this policy list!
08.12.2025 10:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Even weirder because it is "renationalise schools". Which ones were privatised?
08.12.2025 10:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It's constantly baffling to me that the left's response to voters saying that everything the government does is badly run is to say that more stuff should be nationalized and run by the government.
08.12.2025 09:18 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1When did they say nationalise schools? Manifesto was scrap VAT and charitable status
08.12.2025 09:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Or maybe thay understand that you get more cuts mainly because the economy is weaker (obvs also inflation could just fall for π€·ββοΈ, or financial repression)
07.12.2025 21:26 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But the more people who buy the homeopathic "remedies", the more diluted those beliefs
06.12.2025 14:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0political science
06.12.2025 12:47 β π 699 π 148 π¬ 8 π 0Blockchain
06.12.2025 11:55 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0