What a lovely post. Thanks, Kirsty. Made my day.
10.02.2026 20:18 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
How much renewables is too much? || Environment Correspondent @vickyallan.bsky.social
www.heraldscotland.com/opin...
21.01.2026 16:39 —
👍 0
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Thanks to Spokes for sharing thoughts on the tram consultation.
If you're blocked by the paywall you might like to grab our great subscription deal, which ends on Monday
www.heraldscotland.com/subscribe/?u...
30.11.2025 12:02 —
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Herald article headline & picture of bike & tram
Winds of change ♻️
Why cyclists fear dangers of new Edinburgh tram route
25th November
Start of article
When it comes to Edinburgh trams and cycling, I’m probably guilty myself of having focussed all too much on the matter of what the preferred route will mean for the leafy Roseburn Path.
It was one of the headline stories in our recent Future of Edinburgh Trams series – and, after cycling up and down its verdant avenue a few times, I wrote about what cyclists were saying about their much-loved route.
Some were vehemently against the plan. One described it as "the best commute you can imagine in a city". But Spokes, the Edinburgh cycling campaign, was broadly supportive of the compromise of a single track tram down the path, with cycle and walkway running alongside.
What was striking, though, was that, for Spokes, this wasn’t all about the Roseburn Path. They have a wider, more holistic view, and there were other issues that the cyclists involved in this campaign brought up - not least some of the dangers a new tram route might bring for cyclists.
Their response to the tram consultation reflects that wider view.
Spokes member, Ian Maxwell explains this as informed by the campaign's "previous experience during the planning and construction of Edinburgh’s existing tram routes".
"In 2007," he says, "we invited a Dutch planner with extensive knowledge of tram design to visit Edinburgh and review the proposals for Princes Street and Leith Walk.
“In his report Hans van der Stok from Goudappel mobility consultants commented that: 'The introduction of a tram system is a chance to emphasise other means of urban transport than private cars.' This would of course always include safe travel by bike”
We know that one of the aims of the tram extension is to reduce car traffic and to head off potential traffic growth in development areas such as Granton and the Bioquarter, and, if that is the goal, Spokes suggests that Edinburgh needs to follow the Dutch lead.
“The project,” Maxwell says, “should also be accompanied by complementary measures to further e…
part 2
For Spokes, tram introduction should be about creating “an integrated sustainable transport place-making project”.
“It shouldn’t be a tram-only project into which cycling and walking have to be slotted in once all the tramline decisions are taken, as happened with tramline 1 and to a considerable (though lesser) extent in the Newhaven extension.”
READ MORE:
The future of Edinburgh trams
Is Edinburgh tram consultation a ‘false choice’? Here’s what the evidence says
I cycled the Roseburn Path - here’s why so many cyclists love and defend it
Most strikingly, the campaign note that the proposals could bring new dangers for cyclists, and advocates that it should avoid introducing “any major new risks to cyclists”.
Spokes, for instance, highlights the fact that “the kerb-adjacent tram stops proposed at North Bridge and Newington would be intolerably dangerous, forcing on-road cyclists to cross tram tracks at an extremely dangerous angle”.
Maxwell also points out that on the route through North and South Bridge, cyclists are “immediately adjacent to tramlines” and observes that this had been “a cause of ongoing crashes, injuries and compensation claims at Haymarket and Princes Street”.
He writes: “Given very limited space on the road and for pedestrians, Spokes has suggested a range of alternatives, including single-track tram southbound and Market Street/ Pleasance northbound - there are many similar examples in Nottingham, Dublin and Amsterdam. Another alternative is the Mobility Plan’s long-term ambition of a tramline in Morrison Street and the Meadows, an option also favoured by Edinburgh World Heritage.”
Spokes also suggests that the proposed North Bridge tram stop should be replaced by stops at Waverley Steps and at North Bridge arcade. “This would serve,” Maxwell says, “Princes Street, Waverley Station and the Old Town more effectively than tram users having to walk from a congested tramstop in the middle of North Bridge.”
“Further sout…
end of article..
Other issues they raise include how, staff and patients at the Royal Infirmary will reach the tram stop.
And what of the Roseburn Path? Spokes has pointed out “plusses and minuses to both the Roseburn and the Orchard Brae route options”.
“On Roseburn," the campaign says, "the now planned single track running, with battery powered trams, certainly lessens the negatives there, but ecology and ambience suffer a loss even with mitigation measures.
"However, since it was Spokes who, years ago, argued to install tarmacked paths on disused railways which were entirely occupied by nature, including draining wetland cuttings, perhaps we cannot complain too much! The Orchard Brae option introduces new onroad tramline dangers, but of course leaves Roseburn untouched.”
Sign up for the Winds of Change newsletter and get a weekly update on all things climate and energy.
Finally, if Roseburn is the Council’s chosen option, Spokes urges that the plans include a cycle and pedestrian bridge over the tram and mainline railway, linking Roseburn path to the "fantastic new path to the canal", avoiding the long ramps down to road level and up again. "This bridge," Maxwell says, "is already an aspiration in the Council’s Mobility Plan and would be a truly transformative improvement in the city’s offroad network."
Roseburn has, of course, its other issues. It’s a wildlife corridor, home to badgers, foxes, rabbits, bats, and arguments about what happens there are much about green space and biodiversity as they are about bikes.
I am a fairly nervous cyclist. The virtue, for me, of the Roseburn Path, when I have used it, is partly that it feels safe, and away from the traffic - away from worrying about cars, buses or getting caught in tramlines.
But Roseburn is just one path, down a route I take infrequently, and, in reality, what would actually make me into a more regular cyclist is the feeling that all routes are safe, whatever part of town.
Nothing comes without d…
#EdinburghTram
@vickyallan.bsky.social @heraldscotland.bsky.social
interviews us
-> www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/2564...
@edi.bike @stephenjenkinson.bsky.social @chasbooth.bsky.social @davidfkey.bsky.social @sannedd.bsky.social @edinburghtrams.bsky.social @edinpl.bsky.social @edfoc.bsky.social
26.11.2025 17:52 —
👍 6
🔁 2
💬 2
📌 1
Final day of City of Edinburgh tram consultation. Wondering what the Roseburn Path route will mean for bikes? Here's what cyclists are saying... 🚴
17.11.2025 14:51 —
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
☝️ TRAM
"fantastically comprehensive" Spokes response says @edi.bike
@spurtle.bsky.social @turvill.bsky.social @alastairdalton.bsky.social @threadinburgh.scot @lauralaker.bsky.social @smcarthurreports.bsky.social @holyroodmag.bsky.social @severincarrell.bsky.social @vickyallan.bsky.social
17.11.2025 09:33 —
👍 0
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Do the jobs figures add up? What are the opportunities and the questions? What’s the plan for workers rights?
www.heraldscotland.com/opin...
@vickyallan.bsky.social
22.10.2025 16:00 —
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Could Galloway Dark Sky park lose its status because of windfarms lights? How do we fight climate change and make sure we hold onto other disappearing aspects of the natural world?
Fascinating chat with concerned Dark Sky Ranger, Matthew MvFadzean
29.08.2025 12:36 —
👍 1
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Dumfries & Galloway has the second highest percentage of old people. But many young people choose to stay in the region - and love it
www.heraldscotland.com/news...
@vickyallan.bsky.social
25.08.2025 15:35 —
👍 0
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0