Bombing schools is not self defense. Itβs not a βpreemptive strikeβ because the school was never going to bomb anyone
28.02.2026 14:42 β π 26 π 6 π¬ 0 π 0@queenmab.bsky.social
Your neighborhood legal historian with a focus on constructions of race & antisemitism in US law. She/her (was @queenmab87 at the other place) https://open.substack.com/pub/miabrett
Bombing schools is not self defense. Itβs not a βpreemptive strikeβ because the school was never going to bomb anyone
28.02.2026 14:42 β π 26 π 6 π¬ 0 π 0In response to a viral story abt a child hospitalized for measles bec of anti-vax parents many are calling to take children away from parents who wont vaccinate. While well intentioned such a policy will only increase family separation of marginalized communities open.substack.com/pub/miabrett...
23.02.2026 19:18 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thereβs a case I remember from law school in which indigenous parents lost custody because they didnβt seek medical attention fast enough but I canβt find it. Is this ringing a bell to anyone?
23.02.2026 17:40 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I have! Though Iβm not as active as the other place
22.02.2026 23:17 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0NYTimes ran an article on laws in OK & NY to allow for resentencing for women in prison for killing their abusers if the abuse βcontributedβ to the crime & itβs filled w/ quotes from prosecutors abt public safety & mutual abuse. These women are decades into their sentences
22.02.2026 23:11 β π 12 π 5 π¬ 1 π 0It's not just the SAVE Act. All voter ID laws are voter suppression. Stop claiming it would be fine if the government provided the IDs-you're validating a central part of the argument
open.substack.com/pub/miabrett...
Yes thatβs why the bounty hunter strategy was originally tried in Texas for SB8. Going to keep digging. Thanks again for posting it!
20.02.2026 17:32 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Just read through this whole bill. While it has a civil enforcement mechanism it looks like its only allowing people to sue the government entity responsible for building accommodations not individual trans people. Bizarre legal claim still
20.02.2026 17:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Oh Iβm so sorry!! Youβre right. I didnβt see it mentioned in the article. Thank you so much for passing it along
18.02.2026 20:30 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Any anti trans bathroom bill is awful but it doesnβt look like that one is trying to enforce the bounty hunter element
18.02.2026 19:17 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Kansas Republicans overrode Gov Kelly's veto of their "Bathroom Bounty" bill to allow ppl to sue trans ppl they think used the wrong bathroom. SCOTUS allowed Texas to try this for abortion & I fear we'll see more bounty hunter bills like this. I'm working on a piece for @rewirenewsgroup.com now
18.02.2026 18:27 β π 46 π 25 π¬ 4 π 1Prosecuting (or at least investigating) miscarriages is actually an important element of criminalizing abortion & enforcing traditional gender roles
bsky.app/profile/quee...
Another attempt by the state to prosecute pregnancy loss. wach.com/news/local/c...
18.02.2026 15:19 β π 9 π 4 π¬ 2 π 1If my job situation wasn't difficult enough I thought I had another month left on my unemployment but it just ended. Please reach out if you have any paid work even just a short term project. Or consider supporting my work by subscribing to my substack miabrett.substack.com
16.02.2026 21:19 β π 6 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0The ADL is actively contributing to making an accusation of antisemitism seem like the boy who cried wolf with disinformation & racism. Itβs actively putting Jews in danger. If I didnβt know better Iβd say theyβre doing it on purpose
14.02.2026 04:58 β π 23 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Is there anyone in my network connected to @democracydocket.com
13.02.2026 17:54 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Since the SAVE act passed the house hereβs your regular reminder not only that this act will disenfranchise married/divorced women, trans ppl, rural voters but also that ALL voter ID laws do so. The Save Act just does it on a larger scale @rewirenewsgroup.com rewirenewsgroup.com/2025/04/01/o...
13.02.2026 15:17 β π 96 π 50 π¬ 4 π 4I donβt have any options. At least Iβm getting a little money there
12.02.2026 22:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'm glad people are disconnecting their Ring Cameras after the Superbowl Ad and Flock Safety partnership but if society cared about gender based violence we never would have embraced so much tech surveillance in the first place
open.substack.com/pub/miabrett...
Is there a way for multiple substack creators to basically band together and charge like $10-20/month but you get access to 5-10 peoples substacks? Iβm actively building mine and would love to work with other writers to support each other!
12.02.2026 17:19 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Thank you
12.02.2026 13:53 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβm already doing all of that
12.02.2026 04:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ok. How does that help me get a job?
12.02.2026 03:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0All I can think about is finding a job. All I do is contact people. Send in applications. Email people who said they wanted me to do freelance for them. I have worked since high school. I have a PhD. I donβt know how Iβm going to get my bills paid
12.02.2026 02:41 β π 21 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0No I didnβt say anything about their motivation. Simply that their argument did validate enslaved people as not being people. And even so a constitutional amendment 75 years later is meaningless to the meaning behind the 3/5 compromise
10.02.2026 20:18 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I apologize I misunderstood what you were objecting to in my tweet. I donβt understand how any of that means Iβm wrong about 3/5 compromise
10.02.2026 20:05 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Additionally that section wasnβt undermined by Jim Crow because itβs about population count-not voting. And section 2 is racist for excluding βIndians.β So still not sure how any of that questions my argument
10.02.2026 20:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Uh donβt know which sentence youβre referring to but I think you mean the first sentence. Donβt know how you could claim anything in the 14th is akin to the 3/5 compromise. Section 2 excludes βIndiansβ from being counted for representation but it doesnβt include language about their personhood
10.02.2026 19:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0This is in large part due to the fact that the north WAS arguing for enslaved people to literally not count as people. Yes their argument made more consistent sense & wanted to limit slave power but it still supported the underlying slavery justification that slaves werenβt people
10.02.2026 18:13 β π 8 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0