And here's some other stuff I recommend if you get time:
www.theenergymix.com/u-s-owned-oi...
And www.americanprogress.org/article/thes...
@conorcurtis.bsky.social
Comms Director at Sierra Club Canada / MA Policy / BA Hist. / fmr manager at a food bank / writer / podcaster from Corner Brook NL. My Views. Wealth limit, direct redistribution: https://energymixweekender.substack.com/p/a-new-fundamental-fairness-can-save
And here's some other stuff I recommend if you get time:
www.theenergymix.com/u-s-owned-oi...
And www.americanprogress.org/article/thes...
No worries!
06.12.2025 04:12 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0(2/2) "Only 7 days after the MOU, the Alberta Government guts industrial emitter carbon tax": www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSmh...
Effectively oil & gas corporations got everything they wanted. The pipeline has more attention on it than ever. In AB, when the pipeline fails the fallout will be worse now.
(1/2) Even if no pipeline is ever built the erosion of climate policies makes reaching those targets impossible. Theoretically the MOU was supposed to lead to stronger carbon pricing instead but carbon pricing is easily undermined & as of today Alberta found a way to effectively eliminate it too...
06.12.2025 02:20 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0(2/2) The other half of "individual people arenβt to blame for climate" is that big corporations ARE to blame. Policies like the emissions cap were inherently more popular.
& by the way the policies scrapped by the MOU include the industrial carbon price as of today: www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSmh...
(1/n) @davidwcochrane.bsky.social what analysts are getting wrong: consumer carbon pricing was controversial because it was directly experienced as a tax on individuals, even if the money went back via an opaque system.
That isn't the case with climate policies scrapped in the MOU. #CDNpoli
(3/3) "The Citizen Initiative Act will see a number of changes under the amendments proposed in Bill 14, including removing a provision that a proposed referendum question can't contravene the Constitution."
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/... #ABpoli #CDNpoli
(2/2) "The Citizen Initiative Act will see a number of changes under the amendments proposed in Bill 14, including removing a provision that a proposed referendum question can't contravene the Constitution."
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/... #ABpoli #CDNpoli
Unlikely that he will and that's the problem with appeasement - it leads to more. His inner circle are too insular. Even if someone thinks there should have been an MOU this is clearly a bad deal and defending it merely encourages the government not to learn anything from it and to give up more.
05.12.2025 20:30 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0ONE WEEK LATER and here's the other news today:
"The AB Prosperity Project issued a statement Thursday evening, calling Bill 14 an "unintended gift to pro-independence Albertans"
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
Listen Below " @mark-carney.bsky.social got played. No question."
#bcpoli #abpoli #cdnpoli
Out*
05.12.2025 17:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I honestly feel Alberta looses put more than anyone from this MOU. It was a missed opportunity for honesty on the future of markets and energy so politics could be played.... poorly.
05.12.2025 17:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0(2/2) βJust one week after the Alberta-Canada MOU, Alberta has introduced regulatory changes that will flood the provinceβs industrial carbon pricing market with credits & further weaken the carbon price signal for major emitters.
climateinstitute.ca/news/alberta... #PipelineMOU #CDNpoli #ABpoli
(1/2) This new grand bargain by the fed gov. is gonna last! (Sarcasm).
"The AB Prosperity Project issued a statement Thurs evening, calling Bill 14 an "unintended gift to pro-independence Albertans"
& carbon pricing is ALREADY BEING WEAKENED by AB gov
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/... #ABpoli #CDNpoli
Again, a lot of maybes here. Given the past track records on maybes I'm really not very confident in them.
04.12.2025 14:20 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Working in the climate comms world one learns people are inherently capable of fixing crises if there are ambitious baseline guarantees of fairness that are transparent. What's often lacking in policy, on climate or inequality, is ambition, fairness & transparency.
www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-ex...
And (this is a tangent), as with climate change, the same is true of dealing with growing wealth inequality: opaque the measures lacking ambition simply don't work. You need simplicity and durability, and that only comes from people having a stake in fairness: open.substack.com/pub/energymi...
04.12.2025 13:45 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0(3/3) this is why you listen to people with experience before you make decisions, this is why you learn from communications mistakes of the past.
Policy does not exist in a vacuum: it is a sailing ship in a storm with winds pushing it in many directions. And oil & gas interests have a lot of wind.
(2/n) β¦ and you can have a policy that does absolutely nothing."
This is where oil & has interests excell, in manipulating details. & now even the anti-greenwashing rules have been weakened.
Policy decisions can be technically right, but practically naive. And we just abandoned all fallbacks...
(1/n) This is a very important read & highlights why I have very little faith in @mark-carney.bsky.social climate plans (i.e. eliminate all measures but a carbon price): www.cbc.ca/news/canada/... #CDNpoli #ABpoli #BCpoli
"all these little details that people arenβt going to pay attention to...
True, I've written about how wealth bends reality. But actually I see the movement's major issue as psychological. Too invested in thinking right leader = action & we dont need to push for more. Too prone to seeing obstacles, not opportunities.
I'd rather have 10 dedicated people than $1 million.
(2/2) ... follow them. We should unite. But if we unite under a political leader then the oil & gas interests have the true leverage and we don't anymore. And to be honest after this week I'd be scared to anger the environmental movement if I were any leader.
03.12.2025 18:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0(1/2) Maybe this is the most important point i can make: As far as the environmental movement is concerned you're right that there's a need for more coordination. But leadership of the movement cannot come from within a party. Oil & gas interests don't follow political leaders they make leaders...
03.12.2025 18:08 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0(2/2) I'll look for two things going forward:
- More concessions or this is it
- A real renewables plan with actual ambition
But any further concessions to oil and gas interests, or a failure to come out with true ambition on renewables, would be a massive tell and a massive loss of credibility.
(1/2) Again I think if you want to lead any spectrum you have to do a better job of communicating and consultation than this. We can agree to disagree on this for sure, but I don't think this really unified anyone & I think it did cause damage, at very least by it's approach. I'll say it this...
03.12.2025 17:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0You probably already know I don't have faith in CCUS though. And I mean even considering I did this brings to mind that Futurama quote on bureaucracy: "You are technically correct, the best kind of correct."
As far as the overall climate framing goes it's pretty clearly on the side of greenwashing.
A new exclusive by Jody MacPherson shows Kevin OβLearyβs $70B gas-powered data centre could emit up to 30.5 Mt of COβ a year, wiping out Albertaβs coal phaseout gains.
It would also draw huge amounts of water in a drought-hit region, with nearby First Nations reporting no meaningful consultation.
Steven Guilbeault tells @woodsideful.bsky.social about his decision to leave cabinet over the pipeline deal:
βWhen the agreement came out someone texted me saying, βThe only thing missing from the agreement is Pierre Poilievre's signature,β and I went yeah, I think that sums it up."
In @stevenguilbeault.bsky.socialβs first English-media interview since resigning over the pipeline MOU with Alberta, the former cabinet minister said the government isnβt being honest with the public and is betraying its commitments.
03.12.2025 14:28 β π 110 π 55 π¬ 6 π 11Maybe, but good leaders listen to their generals and seek advice from those outside an inner circle.
On this we certainly agree though: the accountability doesn't come fast enough for some.