www.instagram.com/reel/DMSjq5e...

a man in a blue hoodie says " it 's not clocking to you " ALT: a man in a blue hoodie says " it 's not clocking to you "

I don’t know how many times I need to tell you that I care about the truth…

I figured since your literacy is lacking that the more short words you read the better your understanding will be. You’re welcome.

What don’t I get? In your case it’s the definition of murder I guess.

The other guy was operating under the strawman that I was not aware of this. Simply a literacy issue for you two at this point.

Lying becomes defamation when a false statement of fact is published, communicated to a third party, and harms someone's reputation. It's not just any lie; it needs to be presented as a fact, not an opinion, and it must cause actual damage to the person's reputation. I understand this.

I’m just playing devils advocate to clarify. I swear I’m not being rhetorical.

Let me just ask you one question; if Kyle Rittenhouse committed murder, what definition of murder are you using?

a man with a beard is sitting on a couch holding a cell phone and wearing sunglasses . ALT: a man with a beard is sitting on a couch holding a cell phone and wearing sunglasses .

There’s no need to act like the arbiter who gets to tell you that you’re incorrect or lying about something.

I never said I decide what’s true and what’s false. But I need to decide for myself. I don’t know why you’re getting so worked up about me just telling you what I think. I just happen to think that you’re wrong and not telling the truth.

If it weren’t evidently true that he was acting self-defence because of the video evidence then it would be closer to a grey area. But to really make it a grey area you would have to have little to no witnesses.

Do you not understand how video evidence works? If it’s not on video, you have to go off lesser evidence. If you have it on fucking film, it’s not really a guessing game anymore.

If OJ murdering ppl was on video, then I would know for a fact that he’s a murderer. But since it’s not on video, I’m guessing he’s probably a murderer. It’s not rocket science. Rittenhouse is on video not committing murder but rather acting in self-defence.

But you’re saying I came to a conclusion like it’s some theory that I’m extrapolating. There’s no extrapolation going on. I’m just telling you what facts did happen. I can because it’s on video. If it weren’t on video, I would be guessing. But since it is, I know for a fact. Do you understand that?

Ok, numpty. I’ll give you that they’re not the same thing but we both know you’re just playing semantics at this point.

There’s certainly nuance in this case, but whether or not he committed murder isn’t a grey area. It is a fact that he never committed murder. This is just based on the definition of murder. If you wanna rewrite the dictionary go ahead. Until then, you’re a liar.

Never said that. I just care about the truth. Cope harder.

I’m aware that people can come to A correct or incorrect conclusion of things… you’re not telling me anything I don’t know. When someone lies I’m just gonna point it out. You can stop acting like I’m trying to sue you. 💀

You said, however, blah blah blah he’s innocent. No, he’s not. You’re still wrong. What is your question again?

Also, I went to High Park the other day, humid af. I think I’m tanned enough as it is ☀️

I cleaned my house yesterday before I had guests over… you really don’t need to preoccupy yourself with my life lol. I’m doing just fine, thanks for the concern though I guess

a man in a superhero cape says " just relax " ALT: a man in a superhero cape says " just relax "

Now you’re just inventing shit again 😂 I never rushed you or said anything impatient, princess

If you had the required intelligence you probably would’ve figured out this case and the truth of his actions.

Ps you’re a murderer. Anyone can lie. It takes next to zero effort or intelligence. You see my point?

Buddy, you’re allowed to incorrectly call Rittenhouse a murderer. I’m just saying that you lies will never magically make it true. Because no murder was committed. Self defence simply isn’t murder no matter how bad you want it to be.

*of what

Oversimplified, but sure. I’m just sticking to the facts of dust happened. I’m not trying to falsely extrapolate a racist or murderous mindset that isn’t provable unlike you.

So when I talk about what did and didn’t happen it’s not a theory. It’s what is evident in the videos of the events.

But I know enough which is that Rosenbaum posed a credible threat to his life.

Not exactly accurate enough of a statement. I looks at the evidence and am just stating what evidently occurred. He was legally open carrying when he was attacked unprovoked and defended his life. I’m not saying I know Rosenbaum was going to kill him with the gun he was going for.