*specks
06.02.2026 02:48 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@truthwarrior2.bsky.social
Fact-based, simple research on military, international relations, economic and power-politics topics. I try to identify patterns.
*specks
06.02.2026 02:48 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Rubtsovskiy BTRZ 10m of 11 Jan and 31 Jan 2026 vs GE of 23 May 2025.
No discernible change between the Januaries, but a significant thinning out vs GE.
In fact, I would even suggest that the specs we are seeing are possibly leftover scrap.
904th 1.5m of 4 Feb 2026. I've counted 37 tanks inside the red section, assuming that they are indeed tanks, as they have been in the past, and that they aren't keeping more elsewhere at this base.
As far as tanks, the base is certainly not growing vs previous imagery.
Yeah, no, the Russians are definitely producing new steel hull AFVs and have totally not run out of the Soviet stocks they could afford to lose.
Because of course utility trucks have superior snow grip to tracked vehicles π€¦ββοΈ
Not really following the Iranian situation, but will just say that what America is engaging in is classic gunboat diplomacy.
01.02.2026 09:51 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0And in that case, I'm sure we will be seeing evidence of full production at UVZ very soon! :)
25.01.2026 22:21 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Big doesn't mean capable.
Producing rail cars is one thing, tanks is another.
They post footage of working on already-welded hulls, NOT actually 'building new T-90's'. I trust you understand the difference.
Have you checked out the links I've posted? Have a read/watch of them.
And on that note, how do you think the USSR industrialised under Soviets in the early 20th century? By selling raw materials in exchange for importing production equipment and designs from the West. A partial result of that was the resultant famine, but that's another topic.
25.01.2026 21:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Factories aren't easily revivable just because of higher demand - at least, not unless the level of economic development is sufficient. The US and USSR could do it, but both are/were industrialised. Highly. Russia isn't.
25.01.2026 21:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I don't think you quite understand what 'production capacity' means exactly, or how it operates in real life. I've added in the links to a two-part piece I did a while ago that covers all that, to your other comment.
25.01.2026 21:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, interestingly, it is the fact that the T-90 loss rates have been so fantastically low that started me in my research into Russian tanks (and just tanks more generally), and led me to the conclusion I've now formed.
Indeed, had the numbers been up there, I'd not have demanded footage as proof.
Examples of definitive proof of tank hull production:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6Ud...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vass...
And some more reading for you - on tanks:
thesovietarmourblog.blogspot.com/2017/12/t-72...
imrmedia.in/combat-vehic...
P.S. Indian T-72s and T-90s are built in India under licence. They were never supplied by Russia en-masse.
The Russians had some left-over capacity (production equipment and spare parts) after the Soviet deindustrialisation that lasted them some amount of time. But that capacity has been exhausted.
25.01.2026 19:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0x.com/A36848080/st...
x.com/A36848080/st...
The fact of the existence of 'brand new' T-90s isn't proof of new production. Besides, how do you figure they are 'brand new'?
The Armata is a hand-made mock-up, it was never real.
I'll say it again, footage, or it isn't real.
Not to belabour the point, but any sound assessment and research has to rely on something. That something has to be solid evidence.
Effectively, Jompy is saying 'We are seeing a lot of tanks in footage, so OBVIOUSLY they MUST be producing them!'. You see the flaw in that conclusion...
One has to bear in mind that however credible a source may be (or how well-meaning they may be), they have to adduce proper evidence, and not just conjecture.
In any event, Tatariagami is a notorious doom-and-gloomer who's made repeatedly wrong assessments and predictions. So has Jompy. So have I.
Yes, thank you, BMP-3s utilise all-aluminium hulls, so those and BMDs Russia can produce, and we've seen footage of it π
25.01.2026 06:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 03/3 My challenge is this: footage or it isnβt real. Documents, tweets, claims by Ukraine/Russia, research by think tanks and other peripheral information isnβt proof.
24.01.2026 22:01 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 02/3 My assertion is this: the Russians are unable to produce much of anything outside of perhaps trucks, ammo and rockets using Chinese/Iranian/North Korean/smuggled everything. If they are offering ample footage of just about everything EXCEPT full production, why not offer that if they have it?
24.01.2026 22:01 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 2 π 01/3 Just to be clear, I dissent from Jompyβs confident assertion (actually, conjecture) that the Russians are producing tanks from scratch. Yes, we have shared satellite imagery with each other, but disagree vehemently on the subject of full tank production (and other AFVs, for that matter).
24.01.2026 22:01 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Roger. The truth is likely much closer to OSINT than Ukrainian claims.
20.01.2026 11:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Well, Ukraine's claims of daily Russian losses are very exaggerated across the board, not just in relation to cars. But I don't imagine cars are hard for OSINTers to ID and catalogue.
20.01.2026 08:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Don't know since when exactly, but in any event, I don't think their counts should be relied on at all at this stage.
20.01.2026 05:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Probably stating the obvious here, but at these rates of losses, you'd think it's the Battle of Kursk every day... π€π€¨
20.01.2026 05:49 β π 6 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Russian turtle tank numbers registered on Warspotting as percentages of total registered losses, by month, over the past two years.
An obvious strong upward trend since turtle tanks began to appear in May 2024, and a further illustration of the deterioration of Russia's tank fleet.
Something we need to be mindful of re Russian tanks is that turtle tanks arenβt proper tanks - they are frankensteined remains used as battering rams and to soak up drones. I've not seen one fire ever.
I would think those that can move, but that arenβt worthy/capable of an overhaul, meet this fate.
904th mid-res of 25 Nov 2025. I've counted ~50 tanks, that's about all I could realistically ID.
UVZ has 482 visible as of 4 Nov 2025 (per Covert/Jompy), most likely awaiting repairs/cannibalisation.
I do believe other BTRZs and storage bases have nothing viable left at this point.
Rubtsovskiy low-res of 30 Nov 2025. A considerable thinning out in the central section where the BMP-1/2s were kept for - presumably - repairs. Mid-res of 28 July 2025 for comparison.
Other than 904th, there really isn't much else in the way of worthwhile BMP-1/2s left anywhere, in my view.