Can you stick pins in it?
27.02.2026 20:07 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Can you stick pins in it?
27.02.2026 20:07 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I believe deeply in the existential importance of using AI to defend the United States and other democracies, and to defeat our autocratic adversaries. Anthropic has therefore worked proactively to deploy our models to the Department of War and the intelligence community. We were the first frontier AI company to deploy our models in the US government’s classified networks, the first to deploy them at the National Laboratories, and the first to provide custom models for national security customers. Claude is extensively deployed across the Department of War and other national security agencies for mission-critical applications, such as intelligence analysis, modeling and simulation, operational planning, cyber operations, and more. Anthropic has also acted to defend America’s lead in AI, even when it is against the company’s short-term interest. We chose to forgo several hundred million dollars in revenue to cut off the use of Claude by firms linked to the Chinese Communist Party (some of whom have been designated by the Department of War as Chinese Military Companies), shut down CCP-sponsored cyberattacks that attempted to abuse Claude, and have advocated for strong export controls on chips to ensure a democratic advantage. Anthropic understands that the Department of War, not private companies, makes military decisions. We have never raised objections to particular military operations nor attempted to limit use of our technology in an ad hoc manner.
However, in a narrow set of cases, we believe AI can undermine, rather than defend, democratic values. Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what today’s technology can safely and reliably do. Two such use cases have never been included in our contracts with the Department of War, and we believe they should not be included now: Mass domestic surveillance. We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the extent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is only because the law has not yet caught up with the rapidly growing capabilities of AI. For example, under current law, the government can purchase detailed records of Americans’ movements, web browsing, and associations from public sources without obtaining a warrant, a practice the Intelligence Community has acknowledged raises privacy concerns and that has generated bipartisan opposition in Congress. Powerful AI makes it possible to assemble this scattered, individually innocuous data into a comprehensive picture of any person’s life—automatically and at massive scale. Fully autonomous weapons. Partially autonomous weapons, like those used today in Ukraine, are vital to the defense of democracy. Even fully autonomous weapons (those that take humans out of the loop entirely and automate selecting and engaging targets) may prove critical for our national defense. But today, frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk. We have offered to work directly with the Department of War on R&D to improve the reliability of these systems, but they have not accepted this offer. In addition, without proper oversight, fully autonomous weapons cannot b…
To our knowledge, these two exceptions have not been a barrier to accelerating the adoption and use of our models within our armed forces to date. The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to “any lawful use” and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a “supply chain risk”—a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company—and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ removal. These latter two threats are inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Claude as essential to national security. Regardless, these threats do not change our position: we cannot in good conscience accede to their request. It is the Department’s prerogative to select contractors most aligned with their vision. But given the substantial value that Anthropic’s technology provides to our armed forces, we hope they reconsider. Our strong preference is to continue to serve the Department and our warfighters—with our two requested safeguards in place. Should the Department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations, or other critical missions. Our models will be available on the expansive terms we have proposed for as long as required. We remain ready to continue our work to support the national security of the United States.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Anthropic CEO says AI company 'cannot in good conscience accede' to Pentagon's demands to allow wider use of its tech.
26.02.2026 22:43 — 👍 915 🔁 226 💬 26 📌 66This is what all the Curtis Yarvin stuff is about: Declaring a “state of exception”—an emergency—where Trump can suspend rules and seize power. They can’t win the election, so they must take if by force. Trump’s false claims about 2020 are the Chekhov’s shotgun of US politics—they must be resolved.
26.02.2026 18:12 — 👍 186 🔁 58 💬 5 📌 0
“Today, the people of Merrimack and all of New Hampshire proved that organized, local voices are more powerful than a federal agency’s ruthless expansion,” she said. “This is a victory for us and all of New England but it is not the end of the fight.”
www.bostonglobe.com/2026/02/24/m...
Breaking MS NOW:
Agents with the FBI's elite evidence response team were delayed in reaching the scene of a mass shooting at Brown U. in December because there was no FBI plane available.
Kash Patel was in south Florida at the time with one of the FBI's two available jets.
BREAKING:
Goldman Sachs's top lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, has just resigned in the wake of the Justice Department's release of emails and other material that revealed her extensive relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/b...
It’s going to be an interesting coalition.
02.02.2026 03:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Absolutely reprehensible that AG Bondi is offering ICE stand down in exchange for access to voting rolls. Outrageous and disgusting. It shows ICE is in Minneapolis is not for law enforcement purposes. Instead it’s a way to stir up shit in blue states and extort them.
25.01.2026 02:21 — 👍 6735 🔁 2434 💬 262 📌 131Feels like SNL really missed an opportunity by not mentioning today’s tragedy
25.01.2026 04:45 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Total missed opportunity
25.01.2026 04:44 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Is it as bad as it feels?
11.01.2026 02:48 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Congress allocated 75 billion dollars to ice over the next four years
10.01.2026 03:07 — 👍 730 🔁 177 💬 60 📌 13Nativity scene with no Jesus, Mary or Joseph. Sign reads: ICE was here.
St Susanna’s parish, Dedham MA
30.11.2025 18:01 — 👍 3 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 1And people smoked cigarettes!
26.11.2025 05:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This makes sense to me too. I don’t count her out for future endeavors but she’s clearly cutting and running. They might have something on her too… blackmail seems to be popular with this crew.
23.11.2025 03:52 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Your segment on the housing market this morning was so well done- horrifying, but eye opening. I’d love to share the segment, this assessment of the history, facts and future needs to be widely understood. Please share if a clip becomes available. Thank you for your excellent analysis.
16.11.2025 16:36 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Seems like a major news story 🥴
19.10.2025 16:22 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I’m glad the pope is being uncharacteristically vocal about the true tenets of Catholicism of late…
12.10.2025 02:29 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0photo of JD Vance
Yes, it's weird that Peter Thiel can't stop talking up the Antichrist.
But look on the bright side—he's also the guy who:
-Gave @jd-vance-1.bsky.social his first VC job
-Funded Vance's firm
-Bought his Senate seat
-Got him the VP slot
Have a nice day!
Person in devil costume with anti-Thiel posters
A familiar face makes an apearance at Peter Thiel’s Secret Antichrist Lecture in San Francisco.
A line of protestors has greeted the line of tech bros waiting to hear Thiel
I think we need to threaten to withhold federal taxes in blue states.
22.08.2025 00:22 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0NewWire tweets: "Americans set to pay more for cars, coffee, adn clothing as average U.S. tariff rate jumps to high not seen since Great Depression — WaPo"
this is crazy bc some of you need new clothes
11.08.2025 01:43 — 👍 8257 🔁 1295 💬 230 📌 108
I don’t think anyone is prepared for what they just did w/ ICE.
This is not a simple budget increase. It is an explosion - making ICE bigger than the FBI, US Bureau of Prisons, DEA,& others combined.
It is setting up to make what’s happening now look like child’s play. And people are disappearing.
If history teaches us one thing
Never trust a man who would be king
Who seeks all power for himself
To burnish his prestige and wealth
A nation born in revolution
Should know this offers no solution
For there can be no liberty
Where one man rules with impunity
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfeY...
Peter Theil, Curtis Yarvin and JD Vance - is there a plan to stop this?
07.06.2025 02:14 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Remember: Trump's Fascist Cities are straight out of the Network State playbook. Here's a 5 minute video explainer:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCj_...
Why are Trump and certain tech billionaires trying to build new dystopian cities and democracy-free "zones"?
It reflects a scary tech idea called "The Network State."
For @techpolicypress.bsky.social, I wrote about why you should be deeply concerned 👇
www.techpolicy.press/trumps-gaza-...
my takeaway from this feature is that in a functioning political system there would be televised congressional hearings over the fact that one of the most influential people in the white house is a total maniac www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...
02.06.2025 17:36 — 👍 14807 🔁 4065 💬 445 📌 306Congrats! Hope you have @radiofreetom.bsky.social on as a guest.
29.05.2025 15:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0