Kotlin Weekly #500 (Internal Server Error) has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
01.03.2026 13:05 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #500 (Internal Server Error) has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
01.03.2026 13:05 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #499 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
22.02.2026 10:01 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #498 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
15.02.2026 19:25 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #497 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
08.02.2026 13:52 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Thanks @androidweekly.bsky.social and @kotlinweekly.bsky.social for featuring my recent article, 'Shared Internals: Kotlin's New Proposal for Cross-Module Visibility'.
The KEEP proposal about the new visibility level sits between internal and public.
doveletter.skydoves.me/preview/arti...
Thanks so much to @kotlinweekly.bsky.social for including my video about Kotlin 2.3's Explicit Backing Fields in this week's issue! If you're a #Kotlin developer, go follow them for weekly updates with all the latest Kotlin news.
02.02.2026 16:25 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0WAT
01.02.2026 17:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0We're here at #FOSDEM! Visit the Kotlin Community Stand in Building K, level 1 (group A).
31.01.2026 10:26 — 👍 5 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #496 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
01.02.2026 07:29 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Joining the #FOSDEM today! Ping us if you want to meet for a coffee and discuss Kotlin.
31.01.2026 08:03 — 👍 7 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #495 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
25.01.2026 08:51 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #494 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
18.01.2026 09:02 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #493 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
11.01.2026 10:37 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #492 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
04.01.2026 10:20 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Is this an honest question or just more of the previous reductionism and condescension?
In any case, among others, we use Iterative Consensus. Running the same dataset through multiple models and prompt structures. Consistent results provide a high statistical confidence level.
Not really. We don't always use the same identifier for a contributor. It could be a first name, a full name, a nickname, or no name at all. Contributors write in corporate blogs, private blogs, and Reddit. This is not something you can track manually.
28.12.2025 12:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #491 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
28.12.2025 11:54 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A good example of AI not doing its job is not having @johnoreilly.dev here. John, you should have been in the top 5.
28.12.2025 11:36 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
If you want to follow them:
@dmcg123.bsky.social
@skydoves.bsky.social
@typealias.com
@sam-cooper.bsky.social
@amanda-hinchman.bsky.social
@vadim-briliantov.bsky.social
@arnogiu.bsky.social
@zacsweers.dev
@darrylbayliss.bsky.social
List of the top contributors to the Kotlin Weekly in 2025 (this required a few iterations with AI to get it right):
28.12.2025 11:27 — 👍 11 🔁 2 💬 3 📌 0
We used AI to scan our 2025 archives and highlight the most relevant Kotlin moments of the year. We then cross-checked the results with a second AI agent to validate their accuracy, without evaluating the editorial relevance of the content.
This is what we got 👇
@kotlinweekly.bsky.social @eenriquelopez.bsky.social - Thank you for sharing our work on the migration from Android apps to KMP!
21.12.2025 09:48 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #490 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
21.12.2025 08:46 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Kotlin Weekly #489 has just been published! - mailchi.mp/kotlinweekly...
14.12.2025 07:49 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
The Kotlin team will be hosting a Kotlin Ecosystem AMA tomorrow. Check this out!
www.reddit.com/r/Kotlin/com...