oh dang, thank you! Happy to hear that this still resonates a few years on.
07.08.2025 22:44 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@tesstess.bsky.social
Postdoc, project manager @ CCeH. #DigitalHumanities. Digital scholarly editions. History, art history, film studies. Formerly co-host of Coding Codices, founding member of the Digital Medievalist Postgrad Committee.
oh dang, thank you! Happy to hear that this still resonates a few years on.
07.08.2025 22:44 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@chnunn.bsky.social opens our conference βDisciplinary Transformations?β We will discuss how H have impacted DH. @uniheidelberg.bsky.social
12.06.2025 07:36 β π 7 π 3 π¬ 0 π 1The new OpenAI creative writing bot's "short story" has the phrase "democracy of ghosts". It's the sort of phrase that would make me stop and admire it, if I were reading a human author - which, it turns out, I was, because it's from Nabokov's 1957 novel "Pnin".
www.theguardian.com/books/2025/m...
Rereading this long 2022 piece by James Pogue. Heβs not the only one to limn the intellectual/ideological framework for the forces now empowered, but this is detailed, nuanced, and sourced. www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04...
15.03.2025 21:11 β π 33 π 13 π¬ 2 π 3Screenshot der digitalen FAS mit dem Artikel, Γberschrift: Angriff auf die Vergangenheit
FΓΌr die FAS durfte ich ΓΌber die aktuellen LΓΆschkampagnen in den USA und ΓΌber die verΓ€nderte Rolle digitaler Bildarchive angesichts generativer KI schreiben β und darΓΌber, warum Datensicherung jetzt das Gebot der Stunde ist: zeitung.faz.net/fas/feuillet...
15.03.2025 07:00 β π 251 π 83 π¬ 7 π 13I do not see how weβre going to have productive academic discussions of "AI" until we stop accepting the marketing that lumps all machine learning methods & technologies into one amorphous thing called "AI"βso we get minimalist & maximalist responses that echo that marketingβwe donβt have to do this
22.01.2025 17:03 β π 392 π 90 π¬ 11 π 14Heute gab es BΓΌcher und Buch-imitierende Kuchen! Dank an Dr. @tesstess.bsky.social !
09.04.2024 17:04 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0#DHmakes
02.03.2024 01:06 β π 8 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Last thought: I wasn't sure whether to name Amadeus. It technically qualifies and it's one of the best films of any kind. But it's a total piece of character assassination re: Salieri; pop culture myth-making. On avg (quality vs historical value) it's part of the convo but probably not on balance.
22.02.2024 15:53 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0For sure. (I personally can't stand Depardieu but that's another matter.) Many films have good advisors, doesn't mean they implement advice. And then films may listen to advisors (e.g. The Northman) & still end up questionable from a historian's perspective for other reasons. It's a set of issues.
22.02.2024 15:37 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I mean it really rather depends on what "best" film means in this context. Most accurate? Something like The Duellists ranks high in that regard. But it's difficult enough to find good pre-19th c. films to begin with, comparatively speaking and looking at the mainstream (historical = expensive).
22.02.2024 14:34 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0A Royal Affair (2012), Michael Kohlhaas (2013), Elizabeth (1998), Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000), Amadeus (1984), The Last of the Mohicans (1992), The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939), The New World (2005), A Touch of Zen (1971), Barry Lyndon (1975), Wolf Hall (TV, 2015) + a few by Kurosawa...
22.02.2024 14:18 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thanks, I hope there will be something useful in it! There's plenty I didn't get to discuss and it still operates within a scope that's narrow in many ways (e.g. focus on 'works') but it's a step in one direction, so maybe some food for thought.
12.02.2024 22:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Indeed π Although the last 100 pages or so are just bibliography. But yes it's a long read, if read cover to cover, not gonna lie, it's why I inserted chapter abstracts. So it should make some sense no matter how it's perused.
12.02.2024 19:38 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It's a very interdisciplinary work but chapter IV is focused on medieval materials (and they come up in other places as well). The main arguments build on each other; selective reading should be possible as well though, to some degree.
12.02.2024 19:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thanks, I hope it's as interesting as it sounds π
12.02.2024 18:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Danke! π€
12.02.2024 14:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0My thesis about "Digital Scholarly Editions Beyond Text" has now been published as an OA monograph: doi.org/10.11588/arthistoricum.1132.
It covers multi-transmitted picture / film works from medieval to modern times, modelling theory, #DigitalHumanities theory and a bunch of other stuff βοΈ
I will, thanks!
19.11.2023 14:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Does anyone have any recs for feeds one should follow as a DH / digital humanities person on here? I looked around but couldn't find too much (happy to follow ppl but was wondering due to the lack of hashtag implementation).
19.11.2023 12:20 β π 7 π 6 π¬ 3 π 0Oh that's amazing, good luck with those projects, I'm excited to follow along for updates!
18.11.2023 20:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thanks! I'm doing alright, finally getting the mandatory publication of my thesis off my back in January. How have you been? Hope you've been well! I keep thinking that I need to catch up on your writing!
18.11.2023 18:50 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I feel like such a spam bot trying to follow everyone I followed on T**tter at once while having zero followers and posts of my own here π If there's a better way to do it, I missed it.
18.11.2023 16:22 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0