The Android feels choppy/flow and the touch also doesn't feel super responsive
11.11.2025 20:57 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@stanislavkozlovski.bsky.social
The Android feels choppy/flow and the touch also doesn't feel super responsive
11.11.2025 20:57 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0github.com/tansu-io/tansu
This is something to keep an eye on. Should be doable to add within a pg extension and bundle Kafka into Postgres?
Daylight is amazing. I'm really looking forward to a v2 (whenever it comes) that's a bit more refined
11.11.2025 18:51 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I mean, yeah - it's not a technical piece, it's a financial article.
When I hear the Kafka community, I think about engineering talk more than anything else
With greater competition and commercialization, it seems bound to happen.
I'm of the opinion we're bound to see consolidation in the space soon, because there's too many companies chasing too little of a market: bigdata.2minutestreaming.com/p/event-stre...
Then I don't see why a relational database can't maintain a pending queue too. Just process the lowest-id job
08.11.2025 22:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0What are you referring to?
My intuition is rather that discussion has somewhat died down, in general.
the data bible dropping soon
08.11.2025 14:28 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0re: fairness - I admit I'm not as familiar with. Can you teach me how some of these systems ensure fairness? Do they refuse to give messages to performant workers and hold them off for slower ones?
08.11.2025 14:20 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0There is some fundamental misunderstanding here.
pgmq is not based on top of SQS. It only provides API parity with it. No messages actually go to SQS...
Latency-wise, my tests showed single-digit write and read. 99% use cases don't need less.
I really don't know. I haven't evaluated it yet.
08.11.2025 14:17 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0ok, so what is missing?
> move data fairly, fast, and reliably
It is fast. It is reliable.
It is not fair (the simple implementation).
Is fairness the missing piece?
(Just want to streamline the discussion)
100%. I'm replying in facts.
I simply perceived your intro/outro belittling the Postgres argument to clickbait to reach front-page of HN as such, hence fought back.
The problem with building that is that... it exists! github.com/tansu-io/tansu
08.11.2025 10:02 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Pub-sub doesn't exist (much).
So yeah, unless somebody builds the `pgmq` equivalent and makes it work nice enough, it would be extra work that probably isn't justified.
It strongly depends on how much of that "complicated system" you truly need though!
I disagree with your take that it's "complicated". You can write a queue/pub-sub in an hour.
We have to separate the two, though:
- queues exists in battle-tested libraries like pgmq and the older pgq
So this is already built. Unless you want complex routing a-la Rabbit, its fine to use Postgres!
I think the blog makes a lot of straw mans and misses the point.
I definitely agree with some points made there and remain reasonable - but I think that under my mentioned constraints, PG is likely the right choice
I posted a rebuttal here if you care enough to read github.com/gunnarmorlin...
Well... that would pretty easily be alleviated by just running a separate instance, right? I am not advocating for co-locating it.
In any case, I think one would need to expose some dumbed down API for pub-sub users to avoid them doing more than just using the pub-sub, at least in the apps.
What scale are we talking about here?
03.11.2025 21:45 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Doesn't sound like a bad idea at all. When you've got close to a billion users, might as well connect them!
02.11.2025 10:11 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Just use Postgres until it breaks ๐งโโ๏ธ
02.11.2025 10:09 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thanks, it's mine. It comes off this post topicpartition.io/blog/postgre... where I focus on how PG solves so many problems at smaller scale
02.11.2025 09:47 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0What has changed since?
26.10.2025 18:57 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0This was posted 15 years ago
(part 1/2)
**taps the sign**
29.09.2025 21:07 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0way, way too many
29.09.2025 20:40 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0when I say โstorage is cheaper nowโ this is what I mean
topicpartition.io/definitions/...
โKIP-1150 introduces Diskless Kafka topics that write directly to S3 instead of replicating between brokers.โ
โEven using the expensive S3 Express (which a week ago lowered its prices by more than 50%) still saves 73% compared to traditional Apache Kafka.โ
/ht @ananthdurai.bsky.social
all in 2 minutes, on the best place for Kafka on the world wide web ๐
blog.2minutestreaming.com/
a new 2 minute streaming post is sitting patiently in your inbox...
open it to learn when:
โข Kafka decides what messages are visible to Consumers
โข acks=all Producers receive responses