Can LLMs reason about combinatorial problems?
Join DiffCoALG @neuripsconf.bsky.social 2025 β where discrete algorithms meet differentiable ML.
π
Deadline: *extended* to Aug 31 (AOE)!
π sites.google.com/view/diffcoa...
@stalence.bsky.social
postdoc at MIT CSAIL working on solving combinatorial problems with neural networks
Can LLMs reason about combinatorial problems?
Join DiffCoALG @neuripsconf.bsky.social 2025 β where discrete algorithms meet differentiable ML.
π
Deadline: *extended* to Aug 31 (AOE)!
π sites.google.com/view/diffcoa...
π₯ New workshop at @neuripsconf.bsky.social!
DiffCoALG bridges the gap between classic algorithms & differentiable learning.
Think: LLM reasoning, routing, SAT, MIP β neurally optimized.
π Submit by Aug 22! π€π§
π sites.google.com/view/diffcoa...
#NeurIPS2025
π₯ New workshop at @neuripsconf.bsky.social!
DiffCoALG bridges the gap between classic algorithms & differentiable learning.
Think: LLM reasoning, routing, SAT, MIP β neurally optimized end-to-end.
π Submit by Aug 22!
π sites.google.com/view/diffcoa...
#NeurIPS2025
Totally admit I may have not kept up with people's opinions though π
16.03.2025 10:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I feel like there are quite a few top people in TCS with "well adjusted" opinions, no?
Pipeline makes it sound like a regular occurrence.
Does the subfield of TCS may matter? I can't think of many bad examples of top people working in complexity theory right now who are agi-brained.
New paper: Simulating Time With Square-Root Space
people.csail.mit.edu/rrw/time-vs-...
It's still hard for me to believe it myself, but I seem to have shown that TIME[t] is contained in SPACE[sqrt{t log t}].
To appear in STOC. Comments are very welcome!
This sounds like it could take found footage (horror) movies to the next level. I'm definitely sold :D
20.01.2025 17:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yea I thought of Rashomon as well :D
20.01.2025 17:34 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I mean make it in a similar style to Eno. Would be cool to see people collaborating online to piece it together. Seems like there's a lot of potential in this direction π
20.01.2025 17:34 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yea fair. I like the concept quite a bit. Audiences are encouraged to discuss the movie with others to get additional content out of it. Wonder if it's possible to make a "typical" whodunnit movie where you have several versions of the film and you need to watch all of them to figure it out.
20.01.2025 17:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Definitely enjoyed the overall vibe. I think that worked. But a lot of things have changed in music over the past 50 years and with the clips they showed I couldn't quite get a feel for how his own approach and attitude towards all the new developments (be it sampling or whatever) may have evolved.
20.01.2025 14:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0There were a few parts that felt out of place, and I would've liked to see more stories from the 2000s and onward. Most of the stories in my screening were in the 70s-90s range. In any case, I'm really curious about how much the content varies.
19.01.2025 04:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I watched it yesterday so here's my update: Overall enjoyable watch. I like the glitchy aesthetic and the way the stories were presented worked better than I would've expected. On the other hand, it was a bit all over the place so I couldn't quite feel any sense of progress in the movie.
19.01.2025 04:31 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Wasn't aware of this so ty for posting. Just got a ticket for the Boston screening!
08.01.2025 05:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I hate to be that person, but I've found chatgpt to be useful in some cases (definitely not a consistent thing) that are somewhat like this; i.e., when I'm looking for slightly more 'esoteric' math. Even if incorrect, it may sometimes drop useful terms or sentences to fuel further googling.
24.11.2024 00:50 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Has to be "mischievous". For whatever reason a lot of people pronounce it "mischieveeous".
21.11.2024 15:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0