Benjamin Not Ben πŸ‰'s Avatar

Benjamin Not Ben πŸ‰

@benjaminvandyne.bsky.social

Benjamin not Ben β€’ Papa not Dad β€’ the Bronx β€’ union guy (Fordham grad workers always, CSU-AAUP now, but only speaking for myself here) β€’ theology PhD dropout β€’ hand-tool woodworker β€’ he/Γ©l

1,024 Followers  |  1,116 Following  |  1,976 Posts  |  Joined: 09.06.2023  |  2.0444

Latest posts by benjaminvandyne.bsky.social on Bluesky

The mRNA vaccine decision is just pure Moloch-worship. The pure worship of destruction and death, as an end to itself.

05.08.2025 23:40 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m not a violent guy! But I don’t know, if I sincerely believed that some decision you made killed one of my children, well, people change.

05.08.2025 23:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I do not publicly advocate political assassinations and I think a world where that happens a lot is probably a worse world! But it’s hard to see how you avoid it in a world where so many people are justifiably angry that they have lost loved ones as a result of some of these decisions.

05.08.2025 23:37 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Revenge, or at least retaliation, is also going to be very important to the generational political project, for what it’s worth. The incentives quite simply have to change.

05.08.2025 23:32 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
The specific text of the email doesn’t matter, but it’s an email from the Mamdani campaign with a very hard to read combination of colors: lavender background and white tape, with links in a blue that is far too close to the background color.

The specific text of the email doesn’t matter, but it’s an email from the Mamdani campaign with a very hard to read combination of colors: lavender background and white tape, with links in a blue that is far too close to the background color.

These background and type colors, especially with blue links, are the rare design L from Team Zohran.

05.08.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As I look them up, that doesn’t seem to be the case. Unfortunately I think people from any discipline can just be dumb and gullible.

05.08.2025 23:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

These are the members of the AHA committee that says it’s OK to use the plagiarism and fantasy machine. Do not trust their scholarly production.

05.08.2025 23:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The closest analogy I can think of is to be ten years into eradicating cholera and typhoid and then deciding to destroy the sewers and have everybody shit in the street again.

05.08.2025 23:03 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That’s what I tell my kids when they call me out on repeating jokes

05.08.2025 22:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The reason that some disciplines are β€œhumanities” is because the process of doing them is supposed to be humanizing. There is no place for AI in that.

05.08.2025 22:57 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lol just saw you saw my actual post about this

05.08.2025 22:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The Fordham person is the most right wing member of the entire faculty, so this tracks.

05.08.2025 22:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I agree with this, and I also think there is a place for journals and publishers to refuse to publish the work of the members of this committee, specifically.

05.08.2025 22:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If you are a historian who believes that the plagiarism and fantasy machine is part of your historical method, I do not want to read your work! No one should want to publish it, at least not as something within the genre of history

05.08.2025 22:53 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It should be public who is on this ad hoc committee, and their work should not be published.

05.08.2025 22:51 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Unfortunately not a case where a bad headline got put on a decent article - Leonhardt and Applebaum are just blowhards spitballing about whether Columbia is legally a private institution and guessing that whatever Trump does must be legal. You will know *less* after you listen to them!

05.08.2025 20:31 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

somebody check if his pee is blue

05.08.2025 18:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

* I do think it's the case that some structural positions tend to be morally enervating, but that doesn't actually change the structural nature of the question.

05.08.2025 18:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That is to say: "billionaire" as such is not a moral category.

05.08.2025 18:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Something we need to understand clearly is that "billionaire" is a structural position* which means both that we need to attack it as such and also that different billionaires can act from their structural positions in better/worse/different ways (as indeed can we all).

05.08.2025 18:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Every rich person is going to tell *you* how great AI teaching is while sending *their* kids to the kind of schooling the Ancient Greeks would recognize. I just wish everyone would think about why that is.

05.08.2025 16:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1698    πŸ” 586    πŸ’¬ 28    πŸ“Œ 17

The *opening line* sets a troubling trajectory. Trained historians ought to know the difference b/t assertion & demonstration.

β€œThis committee recognizes that generative AI tools offer significant opportunities to improve teaching and student learning.”

Really? Says who? Backed by what evidence?

05.08.2025 18:05 β€” πŸ‘ 42    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2

Illinois law requires that hospitals not discriminate, and when Pritzker and Raoul tell the parents of trans kids "it's not discrimination to comply with the federal government," they're abandoning their obligations.

05.08.2025 17:32 β€” πŸ‘ 178    πŸ” 29    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Four Illinois hospitals have stopped providing gender affirming care to trans kids, in violation of Illinois law, because they're complying in advance with the Trump administration.

@jbpritzker.bsky.social & @kwameraoul.bsky.social are defending the HOSPITALS.

So much for being a sanctuary state.

05.08.2025 17:32 β€” πŸ‘ 337    πŸ” 110    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 16

πŸ‘€

04.08.2025 23:20 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It was driving me nuts and then I figured it out.

04.08.2025 22:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2686    πŸ” 360    πŸ’¬ 65    πŸ“Œ 15
Post image Post image Post image Post image

I'm putting together a team

30.07.2025 18:15 β€” πŸ‘ 206    πŸ” 41    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 7

His design firm hates him

04.08.2025 17:40 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"He beat a well-known candidate and turned out a whole lot of first time voters. That's energy and momentum our party needs to defeat Trumpism. Yes, I endorse voting for the Democratic candidate that New Yorkers selected."

Voters chose him to run with D next to his name.

Endorse that.

04.08.2025 17:10 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@benjaminvandyne is following 20 prominent accounts