This post really put together the pieces in a way that floored me. Everything is about to change and we have to confront that reality causalinf.substack.com/p/claude-cod...
03.03.2026 19:28 — 👍 29 🔁 10 💬 1 📌 3This post really put together the pieces in a way that floored me. Everything is about to change and we have to confront that reality causalinf.substack.com/p/claude-cod...
03.03.2026 19:28 — 👍 29 🔁 10 💬 1 📌 3
2025 in @natcomms.nature.com
“Low frequency oscillations - neural correlates of stability & flexibility”
Theta/alpha oscillations can aid cortical information transfer in-silico - a mechanism in line with MEG network state transitions in several working memory tasks
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Whether the system can be flexibly redirected to prioritize specific locations has been unclear. Using large-scale #Neuropixels recordings in freely behaving rats, we find that both sweeps – and the internal direction signals driving them – are dynamically modulated moment by moment. (4/6)
28.01.2026 10:03 — 👍 36 🔁 10 💬 3 📌 2
Postdoc position in Paris: come help develop new generation human brain computer interfaces ⚡🧠💻
Interested? Contact me if you have experience with machine learning (e.g. simulation-based inference, RL, generative/diffusion models) or dynamical systems.
See below for + details and retweet 🙏
Great work by Roni Tibon (not on BlueSky) - surprising that negligible difference in fMRI correlates of semantic vs episodic retrieval?
27.01.2026 11:37 — 👍 25 🔁 12 💬 0 📌 0
Ripple oscillations are central for memory and sleep.
But ripple detection in humans remains challenging. Here we introduce a simulation approach in @natcomms.nature.com as common ripple detectors mainly pick up 1/f noise and not genuine oscillations
👇
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
#neuroskyence
New paper in Imaging Neuroscience by Holly Schofield, Matthew J. Brookes, et al:
Towards a 384-channel magnetoencephalography system based on optically pumped magnetometers
doi.org/10.1162/IMAG...
Totally agree and the point is well taken. On a bayes account, although a negative result doesn’t prove ‘unnecessary’ it does lower the posterior p that C is necessary (depends on prior, n, etc. etc.)
07.12.2025 16:53 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Not easy (circuit out of a brain can’t behave). But wouldn’t up/do
wn modulation of a specific circuit (e.g. w/ opto) tightly controlling a behaviour (e.g. www.science.org/doi/epdf/10....) show ‘production sufficiency’ (to borrow from the TINS paper)?
Wouldn't demonstrating joint necessity/sufficiency for a set of circuit satisfy "causal production" as in TINS, below? Perhaps I misunderstood, but this seems like it fits that definition of causality (production) in distributed systems. Happy to be corrected if I’m missing anything!
07.12.2025 16:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The necessity/sufficiency distinction seems important here. A lesion in C with no effect tells you C is not necessary for b, but nothing about sufficiency (although brain stim in C could clarify). Likewise, C2 might be unnecessary when lesioned alone, but the set {C, C2} could be jointly necessary.
07.12.2025 16:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0In my view there will be many such circuits, but if you don’t know how to look for them it will seem like everything is everywhere. But this view is not very fashionable at the moment. It will return. And then it will be unfashionable again :)
05.12.2025 20:20 — 👍 11 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0
We are opening a FACULTY POSITION (tenure track, permanent) in the University of Cambridge at the interface of control and biology, interpreted broadly. Theorists and wet lab quantitative biologists with backgrounds in control, EE, applied math, ... apply by Jan 28!
www.cam.ac.uk/jobs/univers...
Well this is exciting!
The Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences at Johns Hopkins University (@jhu.edu) invites applications for a full-time tenured or tenure-track faculty member in Cognitive Psychology, in any area and at any rank!
Application + more info: apply.interfolio.com/178146
Prob a small effect, but the FAQ mentions they excluded multi-disciplinary journals from the sample. Some of these journals (esp. PNAS, Nat comms, etc.) tend to publish imaging > EEG afaik, it may partially reflect a shift in where imaging gets published…
29.11.2025 20:46 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Nature research paper: Building compositional tasks with shared neural subspaces
go.nature.com/4ocRj3n
Oh man. Science Neural Circuits would be my new favorite journal.
26.11.2025 20:02 — 👍 10 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0
Research in primate brains has been essential for the development of brain-computer interfaces and artificial neural networks. New funding and policy changes put future such advances at risk, write Cory Miller, @movshon.bsky.social and Doris Tsao.
#neuroskyence
bit.ly/47MXYLH
Still think brain regions don’t exist? That everything is everywhere? That cell types don’t matter and that everything is a dynamical phase portrait?
Wrong.
Interconnected brain modules exist at the level of fine grained transcriptomics. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
A new AI-assisted brain atlas that can visualise the human brain in unprecedented detail has been developed by a team led by Dr Juan Eugenio Iglesias @uclengineering.bsky.social & Dr Zane Jaunmuktane @uclbrainscience.bsky.social, in a major advance in neuroimaging
www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2025/no...
My co-authors have yet to move to Bluesky, so I'm pleased to announce our latest work has just been published in @nature.com Neuroscience. Amazing work led by Junheng Li, revealing that falling asleep follows a predictable bifurcation pattern #neuroskyence #sleep
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
I’m super excited to finally put my recent work with @behrenstimb.bsky.social on bioRxiv, where we develop a new mechanistic theory of how PFC structures adaptive behaviour using attractor dynamics in space and time!
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
This is one of the most outstanding examples of circuit understanding I've seen in a long time. The unification of theory and experiment is beautiful.
When Malcolm presented this in my lab, the audience was cheering at the end, and one person shouted (non-ironically) "You did it!"
How does the brain decide? 🧠
Our new @nature.com paper shows that neural activity switches from an 'evidence gathering' to a 'commitment' state at a precise moment we call nTc.
After nTc, new evidence is ignored, revealing a neural marker for the instant when the mind is made up.
rdcu.be/eGUrv
Lab’s latest is out in Imaging Neuroscience, led by Kirsten Peterson: “Regularized partial correlation provides reliable functional connectivity estimates while correcting for widespread confounding”, where we demonstrate a major improvement to standard fMRI functional connectivity (correlation) 1/n
14.09.2025 21:34 — 👍 75 🔁 30 💬 6 📌 0
🚨We believe this is a major step forward in how we study hippocampus function in healthy humans.
Using novel behavioral tasks, fMRI, RL & RNN modeling, and transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS), we demonstrate the causal role of hippocampus in relational structure learning.
We put out this preprint a couple months ago, but I really wanted to replicate our findings before we went to publication.
At first, what we found was very confusing!
But when we dug in, it revealed a fascinating neural strategy for how we switch between tasks
doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.29.615736
🧵