Zee (BHP)

No wonder they kept doing all that weird stuff to our cows.

Can’t even wait for Father’s Day to pull out the dad jokes.

WHO IS THIS ON THE EMAIL EZRA?

Was this just Jeffrey emailing himself, Ezra?

You have to actively ignore a lot of evidence to come to this conclusion.

But, specifically, you have to ignore every single victim testimony.

Fascinating choice, Ezra.

Lived in Brighton for a bit and visited as often as I could. Moved back to the states in 2015…? I’ll be back when the kiddo is older and can’t wait to show him.

Holy shit, do I miss Lewes.

Every accusation is a confession.

It’s how narcissists operate, and the explicit strategy going back to at least Rove.

Seriously, this isn’t a particularly hard thread to pull.

Not like you, the wise ostrich with its head in the sand.

Again - what is your training?

“Nuh uh” is not counter evidence.

Statistical analysis isn’t numerology.

Also people are just reading the Epstein files.

And with this they are just reading the data.

It’s easy if you know math.

I suppose your next argument is that because Pizza-gate wasn’t real then we shouldn’t be demanding the Epstein files.

“No election can ever or will ever be digitally tampered with” is a wild take.

It also does nothing to protect you from fascism.

Hoax bomb threats linked to Russia target polling places in battleground states, FBI says Hoax bomb threats, many of which appeared to originate from Russian email domains, were directed on Tuesday at polling locations in five battleground states - Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin and...

They are SUPER dumb, but they’re also riding on the coattails of some very smart international operators.

Remember all those bomb threats on Election Day? They came from Russia.

www.reuters.com/world/us/fak...

Or I have the training to know what we can say or what we cannot given the evidence at hand.

The next step is to audit the machines. Strangely this has been blocked, in spite of testimony by people demonstrating their vote has not been counted.

So weird. Such a silly coincidence.

And there are multiple theories as to what and where the software manipulation sat.

Given that Trump thanked Elon for the work he did with those “vote counting computers” in Pennsylvania - my money is on the voting tabulators. Which also would explain the extremely rapid results on election night.

Special Report: Minnesota Hand Counts vs Machine Counts - Election Truth Alliance Statistical ‘election integrity red flags’ present in machine count precincts were not present in hand count precincts.

Where there are hand counts, Kamala wins.

electiontruthalliance.org/new-special-...

Different recounts are required within different margins. All swing states avoided the margins that would trigger the comprehensive recounts.

Instead there were very few sampled audits that relied on the machines and were not had recounts.

So thin! But over the automatic recounts. In all seven swing states! In record time on election night.

So many silly coincidences in one day.

(Not that this was YOUR argument, just the one that kicked this off)

And currently there is no counter infrastructure in terms of policy, practices, or even decent software based security to counter this obviously dangerous vulnerability.

“I’m sure they’re too dumb to pull it off” is not sufficient.

I’m just saying what looks to be possible isn’t actually covert, it’s just not in a realm most are literate in.

The big takeaway is that while municipal laws run elections, the hardware and software is 1) privately owned and 2) owned by parties openly allied to Trump and this regime.

Pretty thin margins. Hard to imagine that they got over the hump once you included everyone else. Unless there were a ton of non-republican voters who supported them.

Whose votes counted for the measure but not the president.

Must be a coincidence. Let’s not look into it.

You’ve hardly demonstrated these analyses are delusion.

You can present counter evidence at any point. So far you’ve taken a couple of poorly misunderstood sub arguments and misrepresented them.

Is that what this is? That you think I’m just trying to “convince myself that America isn’t racist”?

It’s wild to me that so long as someone takes the mainstream accepted take, they have no burden of evidence or argument.

Is your position that all ideas an actions are miraculous conceptions? That nobody plans anything? Or is it that if it takes no more than three steps to execute that nobody could ever accomplish it?

This would be evidence in favor of manipulation at the executive level if it did occur.

And you are arguing that people voted for Trump and then every other democratic candidate on the rest of their ballot.

That there were thousands and thousands of these voters.

Reliably blue Trump voters aren’t a voter trend at all.

And just because you make a false claim that someone burgled your house doesn’t mean burglary never happened.

Again, all you have are logical fallacies.

Show how these data spreads are random chance. And prove it mathematically.

How is the spread of the entire vote organized by time-counted a cherry picked anomaly?

And what is your training exactly?

How about you name one mistake in the statistics in that report. Or any of them. Specifically.

I’ll wait.

Do you know the math behind random chance?

Like…probability is actual math. In this case it’s part of the analysis explained in those papers.

So if you’re curious about how the results square with “random chance” I encourage you to read those reports. You’ll probably learn a lot.