SnickeringSnack

Gay Baby ❤️

The same image as OP, but 'How Boys Play' is now over the beautiful women, and 'How Girls Play' is now over the meme/joke characters.

It's OK I fixed it

A typo, you obvious bot.

If you expect me to defend the pedophile-in-chief you're barking up the wrong tree, dear.

The map that shows where Barack Obama dropped his 20,000 bombs Outgoing US leader carries out 3,000 more strikes in 2016 than year before

He also dropped 20 thousand bombs on Iran and Syria. And Kamal would have done the same.

www.independent.co.uk/news/world/a...

But hey, who cares about our leaders fucking murdering people long as they have a blue tie and a smile while they do it, right?

BREAKING — 51 Iranian children are dead after a strike hits Minab girls elementary school in Iran.

Buy Graros a Coffee Become a supporter of Graros today!

Hey everyone. I hate to ask this, but I just got hit with a medical bill that was about $600 more expensive than I was expecting, and I could really use some help.

I know times are tough for everyone right now, but if you're able I'd really appreciate any help you can spare.
ko-fi.com/graros

His smile and optimism: Sloshed.

I genuinely do not think there is enough hatred in the world to match what these wholly apathetic, disgusting, gremlin-people deserve.

Just genuinely don't care about anything. Giggling like schoolchildren whenever they hear someone is in pain because other people in pain is all they have in life.

So nice to see gay/trans solidarity in the Pikachu community

Oh no, Smiling Friends is ending. I guess you'll all have to find a different obscenely racist show to watch.

Why'd the Hard Vore Hypocrite have to be so uhhhh 😳

I just realized I wrote Pebbles(??) instead of Puddles here WHOOPS

I don't often join this babyfur discourse, because I like to keep my opinions to myself (shocking concept, I know), but seeing as how this is going around again, I'd like to share some facts with you I've picked up over the many cycles I've seen of this particular discourse. -Fantasy isn't a literal wish. -Characters are objects, and do not have rights. -Consenting adults can do whatever they like within law and reason. -Not all content you can see was made for you specifically to consume. -Harassment of a real person because of what they enjoy in fiction is never justified. -Artistic depictions are not proof of crimes, only real actions with real proof are. -Fictional victims are proselytized while real victims are ignored. There are many forms this discourse has taken over the years, but it's still all somewhat related to "sexualizing X is bad" like feral and cub, and nowadays, babyfurs. Two things: 1) What you're seeing isn't real, it's a work of fiction. 2) It's not inherently a sexual thing. It's as often a coping mechanism for people than not. And even if it was sexual, again, it's not real. If you don't like it, then you've got a wonderful ability to just.. close your browser? Just stop looking at it? Do literally anything other than interact with it? Because that clearly wasn't created with you as the target audience.

The excuse that's always given is the exaggerated concern that "If you like it in fiction, you might want to try the real thing!". To which my reply will always be me shouting this: "The line between fiction and reality is quite clear. If you think it's so easy to cross that line, YOU are the one who can't tell the difference between fiction and reality!" By that logic, if you like the GTA games, you must be an aggressive psychopath who wants to kill everyone and steal cars. If you like D&D, you must worship the devil. Expanded to characters, if you like Darth Vader, you must be a child murderer because Anakin kills the younglings. Protecting children is fine, and anyone who would harm a child deserves to suffer. But to tear down the entirety of the furry fandom over any kink doesn't protect children. It just harms adults. Kinks are an inherently adult subject, and in an ideal world, there would be no means for a child to participate or interact with kinks alongside adults. We do not live in this world. But that doesn't mean the values of that ideology are immediately invalidated. We can do our part each day by not involving children ourselves. Pretty easy to do, all things considered.

There will always be bad actors who should be held accountable for their atrocious actions. My heart goes out to those who have had the unspeakable happen to them in their youth. I grieve for them, and the pain they've endured. No one should ever be subjected to such horrors, and I understand completely if accidentally being subjected to something that resembles your trauma is a trigger. But this discourse isn't about that. IMO it invalidates those with real trauma in the most insulting of ways. In the cases brought forth by the puritans of the fandom, the crimes they are insinuating are not actually happening, only people "thinking" about them via fiction. There's another word for this: Thoughtcrimes. The puritans want to punish people for thoughtcrimes. So imaginary crimes are being performed on imaginary victims, meanwhile real victims are still here and are more or less invisible. So the fictional characters get "more justice" than real victims. And then these puritans create yet more victims by harassing innocent people who have done nothing wrong other than the Thoughtcrime they’ve decided these innocents have committed. Kinks are more than just their surface level perceptions. They're a vitally important concept in society in ways that not a lot of people recognize. For starters, it's genuine freedom of expression. True freedom, being or doing whatever you like in a world where the consequences are controllable. That's not something you can get anywhere else in our increasingly advertised and corporatized landscape. Kink is the last thing that corporations cannot steal from us. To sanitize kink is to give over the last bastion of freedom that we, as adults, have left in this world. And for me, that's a hill worth dying on.

I don't often join this babyfur discourse, because I like to keep my opinions to myself (shocking concept, I know), but seeing as how this is going around again, I'd like to share some facts with you I've picked up over the many cycles I've seen of this particular discourse.

Silent protector meme. The child is labeled weird kinks and the soldier is labeled weirder kinks.

it's simple really

You shut da fuck up about baby furs. They’re full of whimsy and childlike wonder like the rest of us, they don’t want nuthin ta do with yooze and don’t do nuthin to fuckin nobody else. So shut ya fuckin mouth

My mounds are subtle, so you don't mistake them for mountains.

RIP to a real one

If you're doing callout posts about artists creating fictional taboo content, you may not consider yourself a fascist, but you are one. You are their stupid tool at the bare minimum. The good news is you can stop doing that at any time

And that's literally it! All the arguments trying to shift the acceptable-to-harass kinks boil down to that, every time.

"But isn't it bad?"
"But think of the children!"
"But it's gross!"

The same arguments always used by conservatives and fascists to designate acceptably murdered out-groups.

Grar's head poking out from under someone's nuts, the rest of him buried in their ass

Grar halfway merged with someone's butthole

Grar fully merged with someone's butthole, but still conscious

CW // ATF, body part tf, merging, general NSFW

I'm sure Grar will be fine and definitely isn't stuck like that forever.......

art by @scottred.bsky.social

Hooogh hole TF my beloved...

"But it's gross and I don't want to see it on my feed!" Even IF this was so widespread and open to reach one of your active feeds, if you as a person are not able to see something uncomfortable for just long enough to press the button to never have to see it again? You aren't ready for the internet.

"But what about people using it to groom minors!" People use anything to groom minors. VRChat is full of grooming but you fuckers are definitely showing up to the next online meet with your cheapass badly mixed drinks in the hand you can't see aren't you?

"But but what if people imagine themselves doing something bad!" That's called thought crime and is not permissible because the things in someone's head ARE NOT REAL and ARE NOT HARMING YOU.

You. SHOULD NOT CARE. What movie someone plays in their head to get off. For fuck's sake.

I usually try to keep 'the C-word' out of my posts these days. It sets the annoying people off, and these days I'm just too well-adjusted to like kicking the hornet's nest anymore.

But it is 2026. And we're still having the same thought-crime arguments from a decade ago.

Support Cub, openly.

You are correct, and to be clear I'm blowing major smoke here. I'd define myself as partially babyfur, and many people I love are fully babyfur, and I'd never really turn my back on them.

But yeah you're exactly right, it's just frustrating to constantly see happen.

For real, the idea of "we should all be extremely concerned what one adult imagines in their head, or what two adults consentually decide to imagine together" is already deep into fascistic thought-crime puritanism. It sucks that otherwise smart Furry posters always flop that.

You fuckheads love to stoke the fire, I hope you enjoy the smoke.

To quote a very large babyfur in the community, Pebbles:

"People who use Inkbunny (or other similar websites that allow things FA doesn't) are inherently different from babyfurs and shouldn't be trusted"

Like I'm sorry, fuck that. Fuck that fascie disgust politics bullshit.

I'm not surprised we're still pedojacketing babyfur creators. Babyfur creators still pedojacket other people for liking very, very similar things.

And honestly at this point if you continue the cycle of harassment, judgement, hatred and abuse? I don't really care to help you avoid its stokes.