I tend to get bored when they stay in the TARDIS too long, unless it's the focus of the story. Get out there and have an adventure!
13.10.2025 17:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@andreworton.bsky.social
Television historian, writer, artist, 33% of Mulgrave Audio, comic inks and colours. Author of books about Doctor Who, Blake's 7 and Robin of Sherwood. Usually found recreating BBC studio sets in CG. Solvitur ambulando. Marra. Durham. ko-fi.com/andreworton
I tend to get bored when they stay in the TARDIS too long, unless it's the focus of the story. Get out there and have an adventure!
13.10.2025 17:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0#DoctorWho #CGSets Letβs take a look inside the spaceship in Lime Grove D, as we find ourselves on The Edge of Destructionβ¦
09.11.2024 14:37 β π 75 π 9 π¬ 3 π 0I imagine that's exactly it: working out what the hell they were going to do!
13.10.2025 17:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 087) Infinite Vulcan - Somewhat run-of-the-mill plot, but with some lovely bizarre imagery again. Slightly amazed at how consistently good this series is.
6/10
#StarTrek
They were generally about three weeks ahead at this stage, but they lost a week after The Tenth Planet 4 and they lost another week over New Year 1967. Must have been terrifying!
13.10.2025 17:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Cheers, Scott! It's my manifesto for television!
13.10.2025 17:05 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I completely agree, mayonnaise is rubbish.
13.10.2025 12:51 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Cheers, Gemma. It is a real problem, I think, that you can't make television that's expressionistic, theatrical, Brechtian these days - and you used to be able to. What a waste! TV has convinced itself that it is a medium, and not a delivery method for a range of productions made in varying styles.
13.10.2025 12:32 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0A photo of the four editions of the Blakes 7 book Maximum Power.
Glad you enjoyed it! I co-wrote a book about Blakes 7 :) It's silly.
13.10.2025 12:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Oh, absolutely, and not just the US. Telerecording was also possible. Pretty much every country would accept film, so you'd convert PAL to film rather than to NTSC. PAL is 50 fields per sec, but easy to convert to 25 fps film.
However, some stuff was particularly made with the US market in mind.
Everything from The Underwater Menace to Evil of the Daleks was shot *7* days before broadcast.
13.10.2025 12:04 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I know what you mean - although Taggart finished fifteen years ago!
13.10.2025 11:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Oh, was it? I've never made it through an ep of the Battlestar Galactica remake (I tried as recently as last week!) but I might give it a go again. What an interesting choice. Is it any good?
13.10.2025 11:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thanks, Scott. You're right: it's a mid-way point, more so as editing became more advanced, and I find it interesting that you'd get 'actors' directors' and 'technical directors', who you suspect handled recordings very differently.
13.10.2025 10:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A colour photograph from the rehearsal of Volcano, showing Hartnell and Purves on the lava set with the TARDDIS police box.
A colour photograph from the rehearsal of Volcano, showing dismantled Daleks in their control room.
Two colour photographs from the rehearsal of Volcano, showing the studio layout from the lighting gantry, and a room in the Daleks' complex.
A colour photograph from the rehearsal of Volcano, showing Hartnell, Marsh, Purves and Camfield on the lava set.
There were a bunch found a few years ago - some of them are amazing!
13.10.2025 10:31 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The loss of infrastructure is definitely part of the problem - they're just not geared up for this sort of thing any more. But then, they weren't in 1950...
13.10.2025 09:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Similar: although it is a stage performance, they have several cameras around the venue, and cut live between them from a mobile gallery. Youβd maybe have a wide shot, a couple of mids and at least a left and right close-up (and probably something on a moveable boom?) It must take a lot of planning!
13.10.2025 08:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Cheers, Steve! Such a lost artβ¦
13.10.2025 07:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I think they should have to number them every time thereβs any line-up change. βI loved Yes VII, but Yes VIII were rubbish! I hear Yes II are reforming soon too, but theyβve got a new drummer so theyβre Yes IXVIIβ.
13.10.2025 07:58 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I have this urge dailyβ¦
13.10.2025 07:55 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks, Richard - Iβll definitely have a look through both! You shared Ghostwatch stuff with me a while back, but would love to see anything else you have.
13.10.2025 07:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβd love to see your set design archive! Do you have a website, Richard? I recall a One Foot plan I had which I canβt now locate anywhereβ¦
13.10.2025 06:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Oh, how wonderful, thank you, Stephen! Iβm also an OU alumnus (albeit not in astronomyβ¦) Have a follow :)
13.10.2025 06:43 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, definitely true that there are various elements at play here: video, lighting, multi-cam, rehearsal, performance, frame rate, set design, exteriors shot as interiors, &cβ¦
13.10.2025 06:41 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Filming? :)
13.10.2025 06:23 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Good to get the view of an industry professional! I think the latter point about lighting and expectations is part of the problem. You can light excitingly if youβre clever with it, because there are examples; and expectations can change. You can make non-realist television, itβs just no-one doesβ¦
13.10.2025 06:19 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0It has gone rather whizzo, Tomβ¦
12.10.2025 22:38 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I once spent about an hour working out where and how that shot was done in the studio by looking at the distorted reflection in the mirror the Polymorph looks into, and recreating it in a digital model of the setβ¦
12.10.2025 22:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Season 1 and 2 were Sunday, though I think S3 was a Friday record.
12.10.2025 22:29 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0βPolymorphβ, I suspect? I did some research on the Manchester studio gallery shots a while back, as did mβcolleague @dirtyfeed.org! Would be 1989β¦
12.10.2025 22:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0