RBM

huh, I'll give a try (sciatica) I live on an island with TONS of lavender

yoooou got some 'splainin to do

sooo..ORGIES!?!?

very classic feel (I'm Holmes and 1e)

second apology: it's StephensOn (with an o,not e) isn't it?
I'm worse than chance on that

and mispronunciation
it's Fr-ah-nken-st-ee-n

hmmm "post blocked" - now this happened only on a direct invitation to examine the argument presented.
The user was operating in bad faith all along

It isn't a particularly onerous task.
I'd estimate 6-10 mins and the task would promote a better reading and context analysis

Oh sorry about that, I reversed the move from standard and colloquial spellings on "rez" vsthe ordering on "sez"

I can help
to" rez what one sez" is to resolve (, res...rez), as in to parse, what another is saying (sez...says)

I don't know if it originated with, but was popularized by Neil Stephensen's "Snow Crash"

usually used in the negative "You can't even rez what YT sez" [from Snow Crash]

interestingly, that is similar to the criticism
TK had for GJ
and GJ had for Democrats

Just consider then, your commentary isn't really based on examination and understanding of the argument at hand

How about we do this.
Since the offer to cooperatively walk through the argument was ignored - let's approach it this way.
How about you do an annotated write up of what you think the argument is and I'll do the same

then we can compare contrast (the annotations will give us context evidence)

I think it's just incorrect assumption out of a sense of loyalty or solidarity

I

well I guess that makes the Month/Day transposition problem a non issue! (I work in environments that use both day-month-year and month-day-year)

one of those "yo! what's your dog made out of?" moments

my favorite pal was a Corgi-GSD

I can walk you through the structure of the argument.
That might help.

I think it's more just self/not-self defensiveness

The offer to walk ppl through the argument has been completely ignored

I recently watched an early...possibly the first episode of the Rifleman..and who was it that was the young ne'er do well?
Mr Hopper

that was rude.

anyway would you like me to run through the argument?
I think there's a misreading probably due to a sense of solidarity

Joe Ledoux did some good neuropsych research on perceptual narrowing and binary thinking /w amygdala activation

we're going to need a bigger rocking chair

scientific diver here, not wasted at all

I can walk you through it. It might help you understand (agree or disagree) what's the point actually was

As far as me,I haven't made a position statement on it. I'm looking at the structure of the argument

both ‪Gallifreyan Jedi‬ and The Kindred have made statements opining that the 'others' are not willing to be effective and are therefore effectively a barrier to true progress
‪

I don't dive on this weekend...at least not in areas where there are boats (I'm in the USA btw and it's a national holiday)

‪If we look at the structure of the argument
The Kindred's view on ‪Gallifreyan Jedi‬
is analogous to
Gallifreyan Jedi‬'s view on Democrats

let's slow it down maybe. I think it's a communication glitch.

you said "Fascism is just the end stage of capitalism it is unavoidable without being a real leftist" and I said that's in alignment with what The Kindred was saying.

I think a lot of people are confusing the point that they made.
I can walk you through it if you like

should have written about a brahmaparusha instead of a golem!
😀

AuGhost as in a retrospective of themonth of August?
or a goldghost? (who stole my golden arm)?

orsomething else?

do they ever get in a tussle?