Vaudeville Vanillin

Give a mouse a cookie../

❤️❤️

Perfect epitaph for democracy

I’ll just leave this here

Idk the Homeland Security twitter has posted some blaring dog whistles

Just gleeful and giddy about a war that’s probably already claimed thousands of innocent lives and will take even more.

You can see it in his eyes…sick man.

Your Republican colleagues might hate the corruption as much as you do—apparently, not at all—but they’re also partaking in it at unparalleled levels.

I’d like to think this is some 4D chess but I know Dems too well by now

I’m just exhausted of this fuck.

It’s ridiculous because the Right blamed Biden for every single sin of every undocumented person as though he personally rolled out a red carpet for them. Meanwhile Trump releases the actual worst of the worst—in a move that was very unpopular!—and Dems can’t be bothered to point it out

Exactly. Soybean farmers in OK fucked by tariffs, a super blue national environment, and now no more incumbent advantage. Will it be enough to swing OK? No. Will it force Republicans to divert more financial and attentional resources than they otherwise would have? Yea.

Kristi would understand maybe 4 of those words

They’ll draw lots, like they always do, for which one has to make this work while the others can still pretend their No votes have any substance.

Like, in theory it’s a deescalation/response to backlash. But in the most superficial way possible

But replacing her with Mullin is a Bovino-Homan redux

I don’t think he can vote on his own nomination (Rubio didn’t). Because it’d be 99 votes, 50 Nays kills it (because no VP tiebreaker). So Murkowski, Tillis, and Collins could theoretically block it.

I’m not sure he’s actually avoided heat for ICE. And either way, the military is just a different beast for a host of reasons. But we will see

Reminds me of Hegseth saying “anarcho-tyranny” earlier today. Just nonsensically throwing shit at the wall so something sticks

“Can you define a ‘war’?” should be the Democrat’s new rejoinder to “Can you define a ‘woman’?”

It’s actually not surprising at all. They removed all the experienced unqualified people and replaced them with coked-out, trigger-happy yes-men.

I guess it's called "corruption." I've never heard that before. I said wow what a beautiful word. It comes from the Latin [spicy voice] corrumpere. But it's something we're doing and we'll be doing it perhaps more than ever before

He can’t. Handing it to Hegseth reveals weakness. Even if the US backs away from this, the fight will continue. The regional disruptions—& oil price increases—are independent of US involvement at this point. If anything, joining in the first place now precludes the US from entering as a peace broker

There’s also still 2 months for the GOP candidates to cannibalize themselves before the primary. The more money they expend and reputational damage they inflict the better!

I think the male loneliness epidemic is part “men are increasingly radicalized” and part “modern life is generally isolating, women are just more resilient to it”

YouTube video by Montana Kaimin Montana Kaimin getting spicy with Seth Bodnar

Intelligent, articulate, charming. And there’s traces of commitment to “woke” ideals—albeit not overt enough for my personal taste. But while he wouldnt be my choice in my blue state, he seems to be a promising option for Montana. The only question is, how will Dems handle his entrance to the race?

Ok so let’s send MAGA

Ah, human rights. Famously selective in their application.

Anarcho-tyranny?

These are literally opposite things?!?

I blame Bari Weiss for the death of language.

“The right are proving themselves to be hypocritical cancel-culturalists? Americans have a historic view of Democrats as inauthentic?

Ooh, I know! Let’s cave, and choose candidates with no identifiable opinions and takes”