I mean, this website IS better than Twitter in most ways. But twitter is so dogshit that BSKY being 10 times better than present day twitter is still gonna be dogshit.

FAGGOT WEBSITE FAGGOT WEBSITE FAGGOT WEBSITE

Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs • Studies and bills Committee meetings Meeting date Details Wednesday, October 1, 2025 Meeting 4 Thursday, October 2, 2025 Meeting 5 Wednesday, October 8, 2025 Meeting 6 Thursday, October 9, 2025 Meeting 7 Wednesday, October 22, 2025 Meeting 8 Thursday, October 23, 2025 Meeting 9 Wednesday, October 29, 2025 Meeting 10

Offence ion Explorer Making pornographic material available to young person 5 Any organization that, for commercial purposes, makes available pornographic material on the Internet to a young person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable, (a) for a first offence, to a fine of not more than $250,000; and (b) for a second or subsequent offence, to a fine of not more than $500,000. Clarification — commercial purpose 6 For greater certainty, for the purpose of section 5, an organization that incidentally and not deliberately provides a service that is used to search for, transmit, download, store or access content on the Internet that is alleged to constitute pornographic material does not make available pornographic material on the Internet for commercial purposes. Defence - age verification or age estimation 7 (1) It is not a defence to a charge under section 5 that the organization believed that the young person referred to in that section was at least 18 years of age unless the organization implemented a prescribed age-verification or age-estimation method to limit access to the pornographic material made available for commercial purposes to individuals who are at least 18 years of age.

A lot of committee meetings emerging around Canada’s S-209, an age verification bill that targets porn but could end up censoring wide swaths of the ‘net

www.biometricupdate.com/202510/canad...

if youre canadian, its a very good idea to be contacting your representatives in govt about Bill S-209, and stressing that age verification policies do not protect people, and in fact make them less safe.

Source familiar with MasterCard‘s internal workings: The company finds the censorship focus from consumers “profoundly irritating“ amid larger political issues — they want the controversy around paypros censorship to quietly disappear

The stigma against coming within 5 feet of criticizing the methods of "non-censorship" advocated and practiced by liberal feminists in the aftermath of gamergate has made them incapable of standing up for sexual freedom even while calling themselves "sex-positive" or "kinksters."

The stigma against coming within 5 feet of criticizing the methods of "non-censorship" advocated and practiced by liberal feminists in the aftermath of gamergate has made them incapable of standing up for sexual freedom even while calling themselves "sex-positive" or "kinksters."

I think this is also correct. A lot of queer games journalists who are quietly porn-critical don’t realize their readership tends to consume significant amounts of queer and kinky pornography. If you spend all your life playing games, eventually you also want to see what the porn games are like

For the past 10+ years, most of them have been claiming that censorship of sexual or otherwise "controversial" content/fiction by non-legislative means "isn't real" because they believed everyone criticising said censorship was a conservative. They're too proud to admit they were wrong.

For the past 10+ years, most of them have been claiming that censorship of sexual or otherwise "controversial" content/fiction by non-legislative means "isn't real" because they believed everyone criticising said censorship was a conservative. They're too proud to admit they were wrong.

Sure. And what I'm also seeing is a lot of progressives who are slinking away from the issue. And it's because they spent the 2010s loudly shouting that EVERYBODY who cared about adult creators' rights was a secret reactionary.

The only person who ever admitted they fucked up on that...was Ana.

No matter your stance on fictional age, or anthropomorphism, none of us who enjoy cartoon porn will be spared.

The normies have decided, and they've decided that regardless of fictional age or sentience level, all of it is equally "predatory."

Anthropomorphism should fall under the same scrutiny though, and will soon be here in the UK, as we quickly and quietly expand upon obscenity laws from the 50s.

Collective Shout were telling Ofcom to ban all hentai recently, because *all* women in hentai "look like children with big boobs."

It's astonishing to see how many people are going back to the "GoOnErS bAd" mentality even though the Collective Shout horseshit happened THIS YEAR

Stop payment processors from censoring games!

Not seeing much on my timeline about it anymore, so here's a reminder: payment processors are still trying to censor NSFW content of all kinds, and are in fact getting more aggressive about it; I'm seeing stories of folks losing access every day

Call them & tell them THIS IS BULLSHIT

Important: The Horror Zine does NOT accept any material that contains adult or sexually explicit content; abuse or harming of women or children; any rape scenes; serial killers; slasher; gore for gore's sake, or splatter punk. We do NOT accept any religious or political themes. We do NOT accept any submissions written in Olde English, Victorian, or 19th Century styles. We do NOT accept any submissions told in a diary or letter or journal format, written in numbered chapters, told as memories, or told entirely as dialogue (someone recounting past events). We do NOT accept any submissions created with the use of, or any assistance form, Artificial Intelligence (AI). We do NOT accept fan fiction.

Then what the fuck is the point of you

Discord customer service data breach leaks user info and scanned photo IDs An “unauthorized party” may have accessed the names of users, the last four digits of credit card numbers, and more.

Discord customer service data breach leaks user info and scanned photo IDs

But really do not let this moment pass you up, call your reps and beat them over the head with evidence that ID verification will lead to uncontrollable sensitive information leaks and identity theft

so "twitter without nazis" is going fucking great I hear...

does anyone remember when people in charge of Websites As A Service used to have carefully managed PR channels instead of these haughty little IT guy meltdowns. hilarious how all standards of etiquette are out the window if you make enough money but the rest of us need to watch what we say

I wanna start this thread by saying flat out: I think that rape in fiction, whether it's to make a point in a serious story or a NSFW comic only to titilate, isn't an inherently immoral thing. I'm not an animal. I know rape is wrong. People don't engage with these things bc they want to do it.

Its not even really ABOUT "hurr you love rape porn don't you"

The fact is nobody with a half-working brain expects Bluesky or ANY social media platform to be able to properly litigate what counts as "consent" in fictional adult art. We straight up DO NOT TRUST YOU.

What moves has the bluesky moderation team made lately that engender any confidence? You are asking us, and yes I'm talking to you @why.bsky.team, to believe that you have any fucking clue how to do this. After your lovely team banned someone (and then unbanned them) over WEREWOLF PORN

bsky is the dashcon of twitter clones.

>make bsky to be "pre-Musk" leftist/feminist twitter 2.0
>start banning erotic fiction/art
>the staff all block the one (1) leftist journalist actually covering the anti-porn censorship online

"I just can't tell why people think the leftists and feminists loves censorship, I just..."

This kind of attitude combined with denying that policies or moderation practices are changing is concerning. This pfp blurring seems to be a new occurrence which directly contradicts what Why and other Bsky team members have been saying about their policies.

Looks like Bluesky is starting to blur certain user’s pfp & banner images much like Tumblr does when someone’s shadowbanned.

I’ve seen it happen to several 18+ creators today, even if their pfp was SFW & even when my settings allowed NSFW posts.

Looks like we really are gonna repeat 2018 Tumblr.

A human who still needs to be told how to spell non consensual maybe shouldn't be making moral judgments on fictional kinks shared between consenting adults at all.
If you find it so icky GIVE US A GODDAMN FLAG FOR SPECIFICALLY THAT.
"Getting extra mad" the gaslighting is fucking crazy.

post by jay.bsky.team: 1. Bluesky doesn’t downrank links 2. You can choose your own algorithm from among thousands 3. The whole app is open source This keeps it a free and open platform by design, leading to better click-throughs and traffic to your site. We 💙 the open web. post by leviathan3k.bsky.social: Yeah, our problem is with your moderation. post by why.bsky.team: Good news! We designed this whole thing with that in mind! Communities can split off and run moderation exactly the way they like and still interact fully with the rest of the network, our moderation should only impact the view of the network provided by our app

the official Bluesky team response to "our problem is with your moderation" is "if you don't like it, you can set up your own social media site [that we will still censor for Bluesky users via our App View moderation labelers] and fuck off"