By my calculations we only need 6 dimensions, and string theory in not complete.
But is correct as far a frequency goes . Just not enough rigor..
Lol
@caspera1.bsky.social
Mark SP Golden — Recursive Theorist, Independent researcher bending classical and quantum truths into new shapes. Author of The Emergence Equations . A punks answer to a Coherent Theory Of Everything!! Get the books!!! ♥️⚛️🧪🌊
By my calculations we only need 6 dimensions, and string theory in not complete.
But is correct as far a frequency goes . Just not enough rigor..
Lol
Very cool stuff.
Arrays of transducers.
Optics as a whole is a fun domain, with huge potential, and we have only just begun. TRM is old, and mostly use for multi single transmission.
I think we can eventually go further when we have mastered larger spectrum uses.
arxiv.org/pdf/2304.11083
There is something very buggy about are "reality", and humans have a habit of over complaining things. Have you seen the proof of why 1+1=2
tomrocksmaths.com/wp-content/u...
Well, talking about the duality of existing in the space between C is a topic that I am drastically under qualified to verbalise in words. But is a strange way can't stop thinking about.
19.10.2025 17:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It is a bit of a mide bender.
And it has got me thinking of a lot of things.
Yep, that's the rabbit hole I when down.
Sometimes my brain needs to tidy up some loos ends. Sorry. 🤣
It is beautifully put.
19.10.2025 16:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Lol. I have been answering you response in the wrong order.
🤣🤣✌️♥️
Light doesn’t experience entropy in the usual sense it exists as a boundary condition connecting cause and effect
In that sense, isnt just a speed it’s the geometric constant that defines how spacetime stitches events together
The photon’s point of view, all points along its path are one
This suggests that the “arrow” of time isn’t fundamental at the level of light. Entropy defines time’s direction only within systems that experience time massive, sub-C observers like us.
19.10.2025 16:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0True, photons carry momentum even without rest mass, but from the photon’s own frame of reference, time doesn’t pass
Its entire trajectory from emission to absorption collapses into a single, timeless event
The observer effect is misunderstood its not about a conscious observer, its just that any measurement is an interaction that inevitably changes the system
At the quantum scale we’re not dealing with solid matter but probabilistic foam, so observation means entanglement, not awareness.
In Minkowski geometry, time enters as a real coordinate, while spatial dimensions are treated as imaginary
That minus sign does something profound it prevents u from rotating time into space by an ordinary Euclidean rotation Instead, it gives u hyperbolic rotations
These are what preserve causality.
I don't follow. This is from the photons prospective, not the observer. We know what light looks like to us. Lol
But I like that you are thinking about it.
The photon experiences no time, this meant it's birth and death are the same moment.
The universe happens below C, and some how fit into this infinity small gap in space time. Like the distance between 0 and 1 .
0.000000000000000000000~> infinity.
Einstein’s relativity gives this to us quite literally: as an object’s velocity approaches the speed of light, time dilation tends toward infinity and length contraction toward zero. So, from the photon’s “vantage,” all distances in the direction of motion are contracted to nothing.
19.10.2025 11:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ironically, the whole of reality fits into an infinity small space in time according to the photon.
19.10.2025 11:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It's all relative. So to the photon zero time has passed no matter how many mirrors you put up.
19.10.2025 11:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The photon has not mass , so has no momentum and is literally the speed of causality it's self.
It matters, because I is evedence that Time is not an arrow.
All things happen at once at C.
So how does sub C manage to existe at all. Lol
That is my point.
We not travelling at at. c experience time,
but photons don't.
Just that being a thing opens up a word of possibilities, and enormous questions.
Because It is traveling at C, the speed of causality it's self.
Einstein’s relativity gives this to us quite literally: as an object’s velocity approaches the speed of light, time dilation tends toward infinity and length contraction toward zero.
If a photon has no time, then does “change” mean anything to it?
Could we think of it as eternally existing across all its interactions, like a standing wave written across spacetime itself?
🧪⚛️
So cool ⚛️
youtu.be/QJdBp5dGrww?...
Very cool right.
28.09.2025 22:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A stunning explosion of zinc fireworks occurs when a human egg is activated by a sperm enzyme, and the size of these sparks is a direct measure of the quality of the egg and its ability to develop into an embryo, according to new research from Northwestern Medicine🧪
www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9tm...
The irony is that the footwork had been put into this my hole life. The US has never been the place it made out to be.
With ever new president came a new war on its people, and the world.
Trump is just the symptom of a broken system.
I know it's old but if love it.
youtu.be/b9O6iCM4vCg?...
This isn't String Theory
All I know is 6D is the possible minimum dimensions needed in a purely frequency based model.
There are ways to make it work without but it gets harder to explain QED.
Having a 5th dimension brings ours intro reality, and for there to be a fifth there must be a 6th.
My proposal.
Our reality is a 5D projection into 4D.
The 6th dimension is the Planck-frequency resonance field—setting the beat, defining the path of least action.
QED marks the boundaries of 4D, the sharp edge of projection itself.
💙🧪⚛️
Reality is the most resonant 5D→4D projection of the Planck-frequency oscillator defined in D6.
That’s why QED works, why constants are what they are, and why physics “breaks” at Planck scale: we’re brushing against the master refresh rate.
💙🧪⚛️