Plenty of those need to be cleaned up in revisions
03.10.2025 13:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@kewhittington.bsky.social
David Boies Professor of Law, Yale Law School. Founding Chair, Academic Freedom Alliance; Visiting Fellow, Hoover Institution. All opinions are mine alone.
Plenty of those need to be cleaned up in revisions
03.10.2025 13:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0For some reason the Trump cert petition did not cite my piece, but figure it might become relevant
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Alas, still relevant
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/rip-...
Yet another no good, very bad day for the Constitution
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/02/u...
My conversation w/ @jacklgoldsmith.bsky.social on whether Trump is a reconstructive president and what that means
open.substack.com/pub/executiv...
If Iβm ever elected president, I will work into every speech my grievances with Reviewer 2
25.09.2025 20:53 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Some excellent news regarding my new center at Yale. Maybe thereβll be some work for him to do at some point
Joe Cohn Joins the Center for Academic Freedom and Free Speech as Executive Director law.yale.edu/yls-today/ne...
Opinion | The academic-freedom expert Keith Whittington weighs in on the rash of recent firings.
16.09.2025 17:32 β π 1 π 4 π¬ 1 π 1Opinion | Academic freedom expert Keith Whittington weighs in on recent events in Texas.
12.09.2025 19:40 β π 12 π 5 π¬ 1 π 1Rosie OβDonnell discourse leads me to Robert Dahl and his critics and how constitutional constraints are shed
05.09.2025 15:31 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Nearly half off for Kindle edition
βWritten with a commendably cool head, Whittingtonβs book will be a key guide for legal experts as well as lay readers.β
The Impeachment Power: The Law, Politics, and Purpose of an Extraordinary Constitutional Tool a.co/d/aQl4iXs
I know there's a lot happening today, but this is sneaking in under the radar. This proposed new rule would absolutely crush foreign PhD students, potentially making it impossible for them to enroll with any certainty of their ability to finish www.politico.com/news/2025/08...
28.08.2025 03:29 β π 931 π 379 π¬ 43 π 88Iβd say the appropriate reaction in a constitutional democracy is to keep someone with that attitude the hell away from the White House, but here we are
26.08.2025 23:12 β π 37 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Ok, letβs take a look at this flag burning executive order. As usual, much less than meets the eye, but great for culture war fodder on both sides 1/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 20 π 13 π¬ 3 π 1As predicted, the flag-burning EO is a nothing burger from a legal or policy perspective, but Iβm sure it will help everyone with their small-dollar donors. But I would advise criminals to avoid desecrating American flags while they do their criming. 12/12
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Foreign nationals might have more to worry about, but again not because thereβs now a new legal constraint but because burning flags will be a good way to prioritize your deportation on other grounds. 11/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Letβs litigate to βclarify the scope of the First Amendment exceptions in this areaβ! Sure, good luck with that. And for those saying βBut the Roberts Court!β The Roberts Court is extremely 1A friendly and even Alito has favorably cited the flag burning opinions. Loser. 10/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0There is already evidence that cops arrest people in such cases that prosecutors refuse to prosecute. EO might encourage cops to be more aggressive in making such arrests, even if arrestees continue to get immediately kicked by prosecutors and magistrates. 9/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 1 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0Same with the referral to local officials for local crimes, but one can easily imagine some overreach in prosecutions that courts will predictably bat down. 8/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 2 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0The actual directive to the AG here is festooned with legal limitations. Maybe this changes prosecutorial priorities, but thatβs it. If you are going to beat someone up, you might not want to do it at the same time you desecrate the American flag. 7/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 2 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0Administration will prosecute lawless actions that also involve flag-burning? Ok, whatever. The prosecuting criminal behavior is doing all the work here. The flag add-on is boob bait. 6/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0The EO wants to pretend that there are unanswered legal questions regarding flag burning that opens a door to greater enforcement action. This is a frequent Trump EO tactic, but it is a mirage in this case as in others. 5/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 2 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0This is unlikely to fly. Flag burning as a type of βfighting wordβ is a non-starter under existing precedent. Flag-burning adds nothing to actions that otherwise qualify as incitement & flag-burning in itself wonβt meet that standard. 4/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 6 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0There is a pitch that some instances of flag burning might fall under existing 1st Amendment exceptions despite the Courtβs ruling that flag burning as such is protected expression. 3/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 2 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0The full flag burning executive order can be found here 2/
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Ok, letβs take a look at this flag burning executive order. As usual, much less than meets the eye, but great for culture war fodder on both sides 1/
25.08.2025 17:27 β π 20 π 13 π¬ 3 π 1Drafting articles should be a strategic effort with a political calculation, not a cathartic release of pent up anger
www.amazon.com/Impeachment-...
You start with the ones that will get votes, if you want the articles to pass. You start with the ones that will drive public attention and anger, if you primarily want it for mobilization purposes.
25.08.2025 13:55 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0