Matt Cooper's Avatar

Matt Cooper

@nzcoops.bsky.social

Manager of Biostatistics - The Kids Research Institute Australia R User, study design and reproducibility enthusiast - and anything sports (NFL, Rugby, Touch Football) or competition BBQ related! https://the-kids-biostats.github.io/

531 Followers  |  28 Following  |  84 Posts  |  Joined: 10.06.2024  |  2.342

Latest posts by nzcoops.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

🚨 New blog post

the-kids-biostats.github.io/posts/2025-1...

This one looking at the use of the {readaihw} package and the value of the AIHW data it enables you to access, plus a peak behind the scenes of something we do to spur on a little water cooler talk in the office.

27.10.2025 01:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Here's to World Statistics Day πŸ“Š

Yes that's right, we've already got our eye on wrapping up 2025.

#RStats #Statistics #Statssky #DataScience

20.10.2025 00:05 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Happy birthday to me!

Let's go @chargers.bsky.social
⚑⚑⚑

16.10.2025 04:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Listen. Greg. We need evidence-based data-driven decision making, just not when it comes to the economy okay mate.

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

02.10.2025 01:08 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Both are 'actually' ordered, just the latter has the attribute of being 'ordered'.

01.10.2025 01:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks. Yeah I think the problem with the wording is the "preserves the existing status" part! Because the words 'preserves' and 'existing' both heavily imply 'nothing with will done'.

So = NA will give B A C (if that is the frequency order), = T will give B < A < C (ordered).

01.10.2025 01:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Someone help my brain without needing more coffees.

ordered - A logical which determines the "ordered" status of the output factor. NA preserves the existing status of the factor.

I don't understand the roll of this argument, or (if that argument does what it says) why this solution works?

30.09.2025 23:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The phones we have, that have been in development for decades, are buggy enough.

Can you imagine doing Microsoft 2FA six times for something 20mm from your eyeball?

16.09.2025 07:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Nothing a bayesian analysis can't fix.

04.09.2025 07:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

advertised CV, which may make some employers think that you'll always be (actively?) looking for other opportunities. Especially in scenarios where the work shown doesn't completely align with the job being applied for.

"This person looks good, but it seems they're more interested in X"

25.08.2025 04:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

As it relates to "Was it useful in securing your first data job?"

For some job applications it could help, for others, it may give off a conflicting message. Like "does this person want the job I'm offering or some other more independent consulting job". It can be seen as a permanently ...

25.08.2025 04:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Nice.

Myself, I'm particularly fond of the:

1. M365 login page
2. Enter work email
3. Taking you to your work place sign in page
4. Enter password
5. Type the number XX into your authenticator app
6. Refreshes
7. "You've successfully signed out"

01.08.2025 10:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

here's the first hint

(am now reflecting on having shared this internationally, intuition on this might be different depending on... hemisphere)

31.07.2025 01:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Chart showing CPI in each capital city:

	CPI
Sydney	1.94
Melbourne 	2.02
Brisbane 	2.49
Adelaide 	1.79
Perth 	2.69
Hobart 	1.74
Darwin 	1.57
Canberra 	1.61
Australia 	2.09

Chart showing CPI in each capital city: CPI Sydney 1.94 Melbourne 2.02 Brisbane 2.49 Adelaide 1.79 Perth 2.69 Hobart 1.74 Darwin 1.57 Canberra 1.61 Australia 2.09

Inflation in the past year was BELOW the RBA's target range in FIVE capital cities. And the only places it was above 2% were Brisbane and Perth, where the end of state-based energy rebates saw an abnormal jump in electricity prices.

Time to wake up the RBA
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

30.07.2025 23:28 β€” πŸ‘ 77    πŸ” 25    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 0
coloured lines, guess the plot

coloured lines, guess the plot

It's the little game no one asked for!

What's! This! Plot?!

#RStats #RStudio #StatsEpi #Stats

30.07.2025 07:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Did I make it within 24 hours?

#RStats #RStudio #StatsEpi #Stats

18.07.2025 05:46 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Birthrate falls in Australia’s biggest cities amid cost-of-living crisis, preliminary data shows Outer-suburban and regional Australians increasingly likely to have more children per person than inner-city residents, report shows

"Overall the country’s fertility rate, or children born per woman, was 1.51 in 2024, statistically similar to the 1.5 observed in 2023 ..."

I wonder if someone was asked to statistically compare those two numbers? I wonder if the result of the test would have swayed one's thoughts on the numbers?

17.07.2025 23:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is incredibly disappointing to read!

17.07.2025 06:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Biostatistician Job in Nedlands, Perth WA - SEEK Apply your biostatistical skills to support a wide variety of child health research projects being led by passionate researchers

πŸ“ŒπŸ“ We're hiring πŸ“πŸ“Œ

Open to considering all levels of experience for this Biostatistician position in Perth WA - one of the most 🌞 cities on 🌏

www.seek.com.au/job/85795271...

#RStats #RStudio #StatsEpi #Stats

16.07.2025 03:43 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Longitudinal studies | Grant funding | Wellcome Wellcome are funding research teams to analyse longitudinal data to help identify mental health conditions early. See eligibility information and find out how to apply.

A little bit sad to see that 'statistician' wasn't one of the many 'data' professions listed on this page.

I'm sure the engineers will nail this though. PowerBI crashboard incoming?

#RStats #RStudio #StatsEpi #Stats

07.07.2025 03:24 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Large-scale projects – The Kids Biostats

🚨 New blog post alert - This one looking at large scale projects with analysis feeding into Professional Reports, as opposed to peer-reviewed journal articles.

Exploring some challenges and learnings.

the-kids-biostats.github.io/posts/2025-0...

#RStats #RStudio #StatsEpi #Stats #DataScience

03.07.2025 06:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Had Stephen Mayne on @alankohler.bsky.social's podcast last week talking about paying for private school pre tax. Like the people involved in over (publicly) funded private schools need more tax breaks!

15.06.2025 23:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

🐟🐟🍣🍣🐟🐟 has entered the chat

09.06.2025 01:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Assuming it is $3.1 million, with the $80,000 pension payment it becomes $3.18 million. If your balance on June 30, 2026, is greater than $3 million (say $3.1 million) then Division 296 tax will count a balance of $3.18 million in its calculations even if your balance at the start of the year was less than $3 million (in your case $2 million)

One aspect of Division 296 tax where you have a greater than $3 million balance at the end of the year but a balance of less than $3 million at the start is that it will be calculated as if your year started with a $3 million balance.

When determining your super earnings for Division 296 tax purposes you add together your year-end balance with pension payments and then deduct your balance at the start of the year from this. That’s $3.1 million plus $80,000 less $3 million. This will give you total super earnings for Division 296 purposes of $180,000.

Despite the large increase in your fund from $2 million to $3.1 million, your Division 296 liability will be significantly less given it won’t include the increase in your total super below the $3 million threshold. The 15 per cent tax will only apply to the percentage that $180,000 represents of $3.18 million or 5.66 per cent.

While 15 per cent of $180,000 is $27,000, 5.66 per cent of this results in a Division 296 tax liability of $1528.

This assumes there is no change in the proposed tax when – and if – it finally becomes law.

Assuming it is $3.1 million, with the $80,000 pension payment it becomes $3.18 million. If your balance on June 30, 2026, is greater than $3 million (say $3.1 million) then Division 296 tax will count a balance of $3.18 million in its calculations even if your balance at the start of the year was less than $3 million (in your case $2 million) One aspect of Division 296 tax where you have a greater than $3 million balance at the end of the year but a balance of less than $3 million at the start is that it will be calculated as if your year started with a $3 million balance. When determining your super earnings for Division 296 tax purposes you add together your year-end balance with pension payments and then deduct your balance at the start of the year from this. That’s $3.1 million plus $80,000 less $3 million. This will give you total super earnings for Division 296 purposes of $180,000. Despite the large increase in your fund from $2 million to $3.1 million, your Division 296 liability will be significantly less given it won’t include the increase in your total super below the $3 million threshold. The 15 per cent tax will only apply to the percentage that $180,000 represents of $3.18 million or 5.66 per cent. While 15 per cent of $180,000 is $27,000, 5.66 per cent of this results in a Division 296 tax liability of $1528. This assumes there is no change in the proposed tax when – and if – it finally becomes law.

Hilariously, the AFR is showing just how absurd is the scare campaign against the super tax changes.

They give an eg where someone's super goes from $2m to $3.18m in a year!

Yep a $1.18m increase.

How much extra tax?

$1,528!

OMG!! THAT'S OUTRAG... err... oh actually that's bugger all

23.05.2025 00:04 β€” πŸ‘ 572    πŸ” 249    πŸ’¬ 41    πŸ“Œ 10

You, alone, are reason enough to subscribe to the Guardian πŸ‘

Only I need another rate drop or three to be able to afford it πŸ™

21.05.2025 23:08 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Skilled workers".
What proportion of that 80k were 'born into', or 'fell into', or 'acquired by questionable means' the funds that put them in that position. I can't see us losing anyone that does any real work over this.

Oh no, CBA might not have a CFO 😱 How will my bank transfer go through?!

19.05.2025 00:45 β€” πŸ‘ 34    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

I came here for this one. Thanks!

12.05.2025 00:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is daily observations of rain against max temperature? Was this supposed to be water quality? Maybe I need a penny to drop, I haven't coffee'd yet.

08.05.2025 22:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

A few pics from a holiday in Broome, Western Australia.

19.04.2025 13:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A few pics, from a holiday in Broome, Western Australia.

19.04.2025 13:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@nzcoops is following 19 prominent accounts