I'm surprised he didn't write anything about his victory over inflation, or how his tariffs policy is reducing the U.S.' trade deficit.
‹/sarcasm›
@squibbmeisteruk.bsky.social
Nothing profound to write – just try to point out reality. Hate Brexit – no time for its proponents. Blighted by OCD. Prone to sarcasm. If occasional profanity offends, you're in the wrong place.
I'm surprised he didn't write anything about his victory over inflation, or how his tariffs policy is reducing the U.S.' trade deficit.
‹/sarcasm›
As usual Jonathan Portes absolutely correct here.
09.02.2026 10:01 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1Some genuinely good news - Home Office does the right thing.
www.theguardian.com/world/2026/f...
Not at all. I didn't interpret it as sarcastic… I just thought I may have got the facts incorrect.
08.02.2026 20:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thank you Simon. I was beginning to doubt myself after your initial reply.
08.02.2026 20:38 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In my defence, both were known for their previous misdemeanours/indiscretions, but were regardless… or am I misremembering the crucial point that Pincher wasn't hired?
Now I'm unsure. 😬
Were one to draw parallels of inappropriate hires, then I think Starmer has peaked too soon.
Aside from the McSweeney debacle, I also have in mind the comparison of the unwise appointments of Pincher vs Mandelson. 🤷♂️
This report implies that 'Andrew' may have broken the Official Secrets Acts (& I wonder if the same could be possible of Mandelson?) and if so I wonder whether that, rather than 'Misconduct in Public Office' might, in both cases, form the basis of a prosecution?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
It does indeed. Where do I sign?
08.02.2026 19:22 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0• Vastly improved communications before anything is done
• Forget RefUK – concentrate on right policies
• Remove EU related red lines (SM, CU, FOM)
• Yes, more immigration
• Yes, more tax/spend
Very interesting read on Brexit impact on the UK science and talent ecosystem
www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-uk...
It's all over the media. ‹/sarcasm›
08.02.2026 16:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Meh… not only Septics can be bought.
08.02.2026 16:34 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0More favourable.
08.02.2026 16:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Do you like apples… or whatever else it is with which principals can be bought?
08.02.2026 16:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0As a sitting peer, I realise that he isn't "employed" as you wrote and it is why I wrote: "get rid of Glasman's influence…". Starmer should stop 'lending his ear' to Glasman's 'principles' – which previously he has done through the conduit of McSweeney.
08.02.2026 16:24 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0TL = OOO… it's the only one experiencing an emergency and dumping fuel as a consequence.
There y' go… got there without cheating. 😉🤪
Still need to get rid of Glasman's influence, otherwise Labour's 'Change' agenda won't be facilitated.
08.02.2026 15:54 — 👍 35 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0Yeah… got it! OOO because of -361 😉
08.02.2026 15:49 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Just found your reason to celebrate? #McSweeney
08.02.2026 15:41 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0As I wrote earlier, getting above his station…
bsky.app/profile/squi...
Goodbye to bad rubbish.
08.02.2026 14:45 — 👍 20 🔁 6 💬 4 📌 0On McSweeney, Starmer said:
"I's been an honour working wit Morgan McSweeney for many years. He turned our party around after one of its worst ever defeats…"
Seemingly, given his skills and all the party's U-turns, he's been advising on directional changes, on a regular basis. #MorganMcSweeney
No prophylactics in the world of the deities. 😏
08.02.2026 14:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Morgan McSweeney really getting above himself here… "resign from government".
FFS, he was just an adviser. I'm happy to be corrected, but I don't recall seeing his fizzog on any of the gov.uk department websites.
I just hope that Glasman's influence doesn't continue.
08.02.2026 14:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Morgan McSweeney really getting above himself here… "resign from government".
FFS, he was just an adviser. I'm happy to be corrected, but I don't recall seeing his fizzog on any of the gov.uk department websites.
When I worked in Polaroid's professional & technical division, I used to sell & have among my demo kit, a 600SE, for which I bought a 6x9 roll film back… *that* accepted 120/220 film and produced stunning results, but was definitely different from the 127 negs I scanned
emulsive.org/reviews/came...
I don't know about "later models", but the one in the img above is defnitely the camera my parents had, that was passed to me in the 1960s when I was at junior school. According to Google's AI thing, it took 127 film as per img ⬇️.…1/2
08.02.2026 13:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0You're joking? FFS!
Possibly the moderator was a staunch acolyte of #TrumpleThinSkin. 🤦♂️