Ray Bray's Avatar

Ray Bray

@gibbers.bsky.social

More of a reply guy - pr flack that's used to catching flak. Trying to be better. Prev: AB21, Kay Hagan, Cory Booker, Obama ‘12

286 Followers  |  1,281 Following  |  2,014 Posts  |  Joined: 19.05.2024  |  1.7539

Latest posts by gibbers.bsky.social on Bluesky

I’ll also add that I count my blessings I turned 18 in 2007. 2025 is a damn minefield for people with ADHD. Just abundant stimuli everywhere clawing at my attention.

20.11.2025 14:36 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I’m broadly sympathetic to this article as I had a similar experience growing up, I’m not a medical expert but as an adult one of my biggest challenges has been trying to apply behavioral treatments and I don’t think there is anyway you could have convinced 9 Y.O. me to meditate tbh.

20.11.2025 14:33 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

It’s weird because, for better or worse, there’s a whole cottage industry of massive companies that threw their weight behind FDR who are still around today. James Cox of Cox Enterprises and Henry Kaiser of Kaiser Permanente are two that come to mind.

19.11.2025 20:32 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Something I think about a lot is that the golden age of local media was powered by their local monopolies on advertising and it’s no coincidence the largest tech platforms have a stranglehold on advertising

18.11.2025 13:29 — 👍 6    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0

My sense is that they are not necessary but are likely inevitable and, imo, we should work towards common/public ownership

18.11.2025 13:27 — 👍 8    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I do think the MAHA coalition has the potential to be a long term drag on politics. They share a lot in common with autodealers and realtors: a political body of wealthy supplement sellers and alternative medicine providers with potentially major influence on several axes.

26.10.2025 16:57 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I have a theory that it’s all audience capture. You ever look at the comments in a Yglesias post? Sycophantic doesn’t even scratch the surface.

13.10.2025 22:05 — 👍 7    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Gotta be at least a couple dozen Matt’s born in 1988 with the worst AIM usernames ever.

13.10.2025 03:41 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

“For honor” - Democrats 2028?

25.09.2025 23:44 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

There was a study recently from an upper midwest state that found among teachers, men’s wages went up after collective bargaining was repealed while women’s wages stagnated and I’m not sure how we’re prepared to discuss this as it relates to building union power.

25.09.2025 19:58 — 👍 21    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Imo it’s the same reason why they want to abolish birthright citizenship. They want a permanent noncitizen class for unsafe low wage work.

21.09.2025 19:44 — 👍 14    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Morally the idea of moderating on social issues is repulsive to me. Tactically, I don’t buy that the evidence in support of this strategy is strong. We’re seeing this play out in the UK, this Labour government has been the worst on trans issues and it’s not manifesting any tactical upside.

21.09.2025 02:07 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

She was co-owner of an SC political news website that is constantly ragging her - it’s fascinating how many bridges people can burn and still fail upward.

17.09.2025 21:58 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

More fundamentally the reckless dismantlement of everything and outright maliciousness in all actions in year 1 makes years 2, 3, and 4 far more unpredictable.

17.09.2025 21:36 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I mean we didn’t have “global pandemic” in the cards until…November 2019? I was in aviation policy at the time and that’s when we started tracking it.

17.09.2025 21:34 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Maybe social media is the Hobbesian State of Nature and it can infect and destroy the Sovereign.

11.09.2025 12:47 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I do worry that the accessibility, and ability to connect with people sharing and discussing, of violent footage is corrosive to the political body.

People are being exposed to the kind of scenes a veteran of Ypres would see and it’s not like those people went on to have healthy politics…

11.09.2025 12:47 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I remember playing one of those “made by only 20 people and a whalebone” games in the 2010s and when credits rolled I saw well over a hundred names. Why run on this when it’s factually disproven by the game itself?!?

08.09.2025 19:06 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Seconding Cat Sebastian. “We Could Be So Good” is on Kindle Unlimited if you’re looking for a 1950s NYC newsroom romance.

08.09.2025 19:00 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I don’t think it’s that. But I do think they flatten the Obama years and see OWS, Obergefell, Ferguson, and even the election of Obama as an existential threat to their view of America.

Tl;Dr: The Flight 93 Election is the lodestar of GOP thought. Everything from Burke to Bork is irrelevant.

08.09.2025 17:29 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Gandalf was actually nervous when he saw the palantir because he’s been banking on an IT issue to get out of meetings and now he’s got nothing.

08.09.2025 04:15 — 👍 13    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

The other miscalculation is that the average small business owner has a great relationship with their suppliers but hates the young staff that keep “goofing around” and thinks they should be paid $5 an hour (what he made in ‘85 btw).

07.09.2025 22:11 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I have a theory that they correctly identified the tea party revolt as being driven by smallholder capitalist and think we need to win them back.

The problem is that the tea party was fueled by racism, and any material issues were icing because smallholder capitalists are fucking insane.

07.09.2025 22:00 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Permitting reform would fix this or something

05.09.2025 04:17 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I thought it was a club for millennials that loved Simcity

05.09.2025 04:03 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Some people are built for posting

the rest are forced to bun dance

05.09.2025 03:59 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

*Manosphere voice*
“You can’t get with a woman that’s had a female partner. Her estrogen levels are too high and it’ll turn you into a woman. To protect yourself buy T-Booster in the link below and use the code REDPILL20 to get a 20% discount. That’s a months supply for the low price of $200!”

03.09.2025 19:58 — 👍 34    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 0

We’re gonna see some horrific pseudoscience for “what happens when a woman sleeps with too many women.”

03.09.2025 19:55 — 👍 33    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 1

I don’t know if it’s still the case but in 2013 the DCCC was making serious bank off of long-shot special elections, I worked on one of them as an organizer and it left such a sour taste in my mouth.

03.09.2025 18:00 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I have seen the error of my ways on this take lmao

Semi-related: It fascinates me how people can live this way. Not trying to “no true scotsman” but I don’t get how you can be a CoS for a consumer protection-centered Rep while your partner runs a fleecing operation that preys on people.

03.09.2025 17:54 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0