Jaspreet.singh

Slowing down the flow of money between countries can make economies safer and protect a country from outside control. But it can also slow new ideas, technology, and growth because there is less money for businesses and projects. So, it helps with safety, but it can make progress slower.

Symbolic capital is like the respect, honor, or prestige a person gets because of the things they already have, like money, education, or connections. It isn’t a separate type of capital on its own—it just shows that society values the other kinds of capital a person has.

Has the decline in social capital in Toronto been primarily caused by changes in technology and social media, or by broader social and economic factors?”

Social Capital 2022 - Toronto Foundation The Toronto Social Capital Study 2022 is the most in-depth look at social capital in the city. Released by Toronto Foundation and the Environics Institute, along with 15 partners, the report covers To...

torontofoundation.ca/socialcapital/ #ucwcomm150 @houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

I agree with this,
I believe the government needs this power to keep people safe and stop serious threats.

On Other hand people say no.
They think it is wrong because journalists need privacy to do their jobs. If journalists are watched, people may be afraid to share important information.

Yes it is irrefutable,It helps people do things faster and easier. For example, people can use their voice to send messages, search the internet, or control their phones without typing.

Should the Alberta government limit the power of professional regulators to discipline speech, even if that speech may cause harm or discrimination?

Alberta’s proposed free speech law — named after Jordan Peterson — faces pushback | Watch News Videos Online Watch Alberta’s proposed free speech law — named after Jordan Peterson — faces pushback Video Online, on GlobalNews.ca

Alberta’s proposed free speech law — named after Jordan Peterson — faces pushback globalnews.ca/video/115364... #UCWCOMM150
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

Yes , it may limit their access to online communities, information, and ways to express themselves. Whether it strikes the right balance depends on how well safety is improved without isolating young people or restricting their voices too much.

Yes i agree, Australia’s social media ban helps protect young people from online harm, such as bullying and harmful content.

,Governments may be allowed to ban social media for young people to protect them from harm like bullying and mental health risks. However, this can limit young people’s freedom of expression and their ability to connect with others.

Does banning social media for under-16s meaningfully reduce harm to young people, or does it create new problems around privacy, inequality, and youth voice?” #UCWCOMM150 @houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

Australia launches a social media ban – and is AI a bubble about to pop? Under-16s to be banned from social media in Australia, and analysts continue to monitor the massive investment in AI

www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

I disagree, if government need to use techonoolgy , it should be limited , targeted and transparent

Yes, but upto some extent , because it threatens the public privacy

I believe Police is allowed to use this techonologie upto some extent, while it help to improve public safetly, also cause issues for privacy rights

Do Canada’s privacy laws do enough to protect people from surveillance by the government and businesses?

Canada privacy watchdog expands probe into X, cites Grok deepfakes Canada's privacy watchdog said on Thursday it was expanding an existing probe into X following reports that the social media platform's Grok AI chatbot was making non-consensual sexually explicit deep...

www.reuters.com/world/americ... #UCWCOMM150 @houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

Police should only be allowed to use it with strict rules, clear limits, and strong oversight to protect people’s rights.

No, police should not use it because facial recognition can invade privacy and may unfairly target innocent people.

Yes, police should be allowed to use it because it can help catch dangerous criminals and keep officers and the public safer. #UCWCOMM150 @houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

Should police be allowed to use facial recognition technology on body cameras, even if it may invade people’s privacy?

AI-powered police body cameras, once taboo, get tested on Canadian city's 'watch list' of faces Police in Edmonton, Canada, have started a pilot project using AI-equipped body cameras to detect faces on a "high risk" watch list.

apnews.com/article/ai-f... police body cameras, once taboo, get tested on Canadian city's 'watch list' of faces #UCWCOMM150 @houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

Governments should limit or stop selling surveillance technology to countries that use it to control or harm citizens.

U.S. tech companies should be responsible if their technology helps governments spy on people and hurt their rights.

Surveillance technology may help with safety, but too much of it takes away privacy and personal freedom.

Should U.S. technology companies be held legally accountable when their products enable foreign governments’ mass surveillance and human rights abuses?

PHOTO ESSAY: Invisible infrared surveillance technology and those caught in its digital cage When you unlock a phone, step into view of a security camera or drive past a license plate reader at night, beams of infrared light - invisible to the naked eye — shine onto the unique contours of you...

apnews.com/photo-essay/... ESSAY: Invisible infrared surveillance technology and those caught in its digital cage #UCWCOMM150 @houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

#UCWCOMM150