Part 2/2: But today, I came across this interesting article with the conclusion: "Coders who use spaces for indentation make more money than ones who use tabs", stackoverflow.blog/2017/06/15/d...
Wild, right?
@neilvosslab.bsky.social
Associate Professor of Biology, Roosevelt University (Chicago) Grant-funded Open Educational Resources (OER) Developer Inactive CryoEM Developer & Protein Geometry Researcher Lego Artist | Member of Northern Illinois Lego Train Club (NILTC)
Part 2/2: But today, I came across this interesting article with the conclusion: "Coders who use spaces for indentation make more money than ones who use tabs", stackoverflow.blog/2017/06/15/d...
Wild, right?
Part 1/2: Seemingly every year, I question whether I should switch to PEP 8's recommendation of using spaces in my Python code instead of tabs. I've been using tabs ever since I started coding in Python around 2006.
This post pretty much sums up my opinion on tabs: stackoverflow.com/a/5048130
As a former cryoEM researcher, using 0.141 for visualization jumped out at me. I worried it was taking away from your argument, but it actually reinforces it.
17.11.2024 18:34 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thanks for the clarification. The use of 0.141 as a threshold is oddly specific and likely indicates that the authors do not understand the different thresholds. This further detracts from the overall quality of the map.
17.11.2024 18:34 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I agree that the lack of ligand density is a problem. However, the Fourier Shell Correlation (FSC) threshold of 0.141, which is used to estimate the resolution of the map, should not be related to the electron density visualization threshold in ChimeraX. These thresholds serve different purposes.
17.11.2024 17:50 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Video of my #NavyPier #CentennialWheel made from #LEGO most challenging part what match the 21 spokes of the organization
16.11.2024 02:40 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The Future of Orion xkcd.com/3012
15.11.2024 20:00 — 👍 31964 🔁 3671 💬 291 📌 182