At least we’re on top of one ladder
04.03.2026 04:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0At least we’re on top of one ladder
04.03.2026 04:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Well that’s a promising start
04.03.2026 04:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I can think of someone who would be in the queue for The Complete Cameos of John Harrison
02.03.2026 04:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Is this only in ODIs or all international matches?
02.03.2026 04:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Outrageous! Haven’t they heard of Chekov’s Bobbin?
26.02.2026 00:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Bet it doesn’t
25.02.2026 04:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Trump knows more about what makes the best resorts than pretty much anybody
24.02.2026 04:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Providing healthcare? COMMUNISM!
23.02.2026 04:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I wouldn’t want it. I like the simple one liner of title (year)
23.02.2026 04:35 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My god that was bad
21.02.2026 22:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0No, it’s the kid who are wrong.
21.02.2026 22:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You didn’t say Israeli government, you said “literally everybody associated with Israel”. Sorry for taking you literally.
21.02.2026 11:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Great. But it won’t stop him imposing them anyway.
20.02.2026 23:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The most concerning thing about this post is that I don’t know which of maybe a dozen things you are referring to.
20.02.2026 23:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Maybe we could build some big camps to put them in. Tell them if they work hard enough they will be frei but of course they won’t actually ever be released. Once they are no longer able to work we find a good efficient way of disposing of them in mass groups.
20.02.2026 23:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I guess Beans is going for a trip to the lake with a hessian sack and some bricks
16.02.2026 04:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I find Janet’s hairstyle incredibly distracting throughout this
12.02.2026 04:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What, this one?
12.02.2026 04:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0He will be okay, he has huge grassroots support
12.02.2026 04:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Fantastic. Great move. Well done Angus
12.02.2026 04:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ah, threats of violence because someone said something you didn’t like (or understand, apparently). Well done!
10.02.2026 11:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0How do you work that out? I’m saying it was a very effective strategy to get positive coverage for the protesters.
10.02.2026 11:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Fair enough. I do doubt it, but it was certainly an effective PR strategy.
10.02.2026 11:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Pretty much, yeah. The police were moving in whatever they were doing, the praying just guaranteed some good photos. I really doubt that any of them believed they were going to be just left alone to pray in peace.
10.02.2026 11:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Well exactly - they were going to be moved on whatever they were doing, so at least the prayer thing gets some guaranteed viral images
10.02.2026 10:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Let’s be real here - they weren’t a group just innocently praying who got caught up in a situation that had nothing to do with. It was a deliberate tactic to create the photos they got. And fair enough, but let’s not pretend it was anything else.
10.02.2026 04:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 14 📌 2I don’t disagree, but “former candidate” shouldn’t be a status that carries any weight whatsoever.
10.02.2026 04:42 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0