Nate (he/him)'s Avatar

Nate (he/him)

@grossnate.bsky.social

Also on Mastodon @grossnate@tech.lgbt

106 Followers  |  140 Following  |  71 Posts  |  Joined: 06.09.2023  |  2.1644

Latest posts by grossnate.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post is five hours old and I'm surprised it's not more ratioed by now.

07.10.2025 03:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I got a "rude" label for replying to a Chuck Schumer post with "Resign, you impotent quisling." I thought I was making a concise, helpful suggestion, but πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

07.10.2025 02:47 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

this feels like forty years ago but it was 2023

www.newsweek.com/nancy-pelosi...

07.10.2025 00:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1172    πŸ” 276    πŸ’¬ 42    πŸ“Œ 28
Preview
Federal agents knock down elderly couple during Portland protest An 84-year-old said she sustained a concussion and was hit with a projectile after she and her husband, a Vietnam vet, were knocked down by federal officers.

An 84-year-old said she sustained a concussion and was hit with a projectile after she and her husband, a Vietnam vet, were knocked down by federal officers.

05.10.2025 02:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2344    πŸ” 1375    πŸ’¬ 88    πŸ“Œ 161

@govpritzker.illinois.gov why are you letting state police help ICE?

04.10.2025 22:01 β€” πŸ‘ 42    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Stop lying. Your state cops attacked protesters alongside ICE yesterday. I was there. I and others were violently attacked by ICE agents. Your state cops acted in concert with them during the attack.

04.10.2025 19:15 β€” πŸ‘ 4101    πŸ” 1169    πŸ’¬ 41    πŸ“Œ 35

This is an outright lie.

04.10.2025 19:28 β€” πŸ‘ 2352    πŸ” 504    πŸ’¬ 53    πŸ“Œ 19

Calling on @govpritzker.illinois.gov to do more than just utter strong words. Governor, it may be time to get out of your comfort zone for the people of Illinois and stop this.

04.10.2025 19:46 β€” πŸ‘ 106    πŸ” 42    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2
Klein: I think, from your perspective and from my perspective, we probably don’t believe hugely different things. But a huge amount of the country, a majority of the country, believes things about [edit: the jews], about what policy should be toward [edit: the jews], about what language is acceptable to [edit: the jews], that we would see as fundamentally and morally wrong.

And what politically β€” not in a column or something, but politically β€” should our relationship with those people be? Do we win them over? Do we compromise with them?

This feels like a very salient question. The Republican Party is going to make sure this is a relentlessly salient question.

Klein: I think, from your perspective and from my perspective, we probably don’t believe hugely different things. But a huge amount of the country, a majority of the country, believes things about [edit: the jews], about what policy should be toward [edit: the jews], about what language is acceptable to [edit: the jews], that we would see as fundamentally and morally wrong. And what politically β€” not in a column or something, but politically β€” should our relationship with those people be? Do we win them over? Do we compromise with them? This feels like a very salient question. The Republican Party is going to make sure this is a relentlessly salient question.

i took a stab at editing ezra klein’s most recent comments about trans people and electoral politics to make a point often lost by the american liberal commentariat

28.09.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1350    πŸ” 353    πŸ’¬ 24    πŸ“Œ 22

Hi @npr.org! We worked late tonight putting together this handy pocket guide!

It doesn't address road design issues, but if we're going to educate road users, we should include drivers.

It's the size of a folded business card. Print it, fold it, put it in your wallet!

26.09.2025 05:21 β€” πŸ‘ 2701    πŸ” 1135    πŸ’¬ 41    πŸ“Œ 42

I’m literally under siege daily by obnoxious Dem fundraising texts from all over the country. There is no way to stop or block them and there is never a plan, only a plea.

25.09.2025 12:44 β€” πŸ‘ 42    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

If you are a white person who subscribes to the Washington Post, your solidarity should not be expressed in "feeling badly" but in cancelling your subscription today if you have one. Otherwise no one wants to hear anything from you.

15.09.2025 12:50 β€” πŸ‘ 2105    πŸ” 565    πŸ’¬ 43    πŸ“Œ 0

Shopping for a plan on healthcare.gov. I had a question not covered by any materials on the website or linked to it. So I called #UnitedHealthcare to ask and the rep refused to answer unless I gave all my information so she could produce a quote. My question was about policy, not pricing.

27.08.2025 21:15 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
MAHA Is a Bad Answer to a Good Question Podcast Episode Β· The Ezra Klein Show Β· 08/22/2025 Β· 1h 22m

I really enjoyed this @ezrakleinbot.bsky.social pod about Covid & MAHA, but one thing it repeatedly revealed is a habit of liberals that drives me crazy. A short 🧡.

23.08.2025 20:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1046    πŸ” 277    πŸ’¬ 52    πŸ“Œ 106

You know, as a parent I'm a firm believer in natural consequences (as opposed to punishment).

It's not even that these guys never got punished.

They never experienced the natural consequences of insurrection.

Not after the Civil War.

And not after Jan 6.

13.08.2025 00:52 β€” πŸ‘ 685    πŸ” 149    πŸ’¬ 17    πŸ“Œ 7

BBC International Editor Jeremy Bowen has confirmed that the entire Al Jazeera team in Gaza City has been killed.

10.08.2025 22:33 β€” πŸ‘ 12439    πŸ” 9888    πŸ’¬ 632    πŸ“Œ 1635

I wrote "Resign, you impotent quisling" in response to a post from Chuck Schumer and \@moderation.bsky.app labeled it "Rude." So be careful with good words, I guess. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

06.08.2025 21:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

None of these words are obscene so as far as I can tell the only reason to label this comment is if you disagree with the sentiment. 2/2

06.08.2025 19:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just noticed that this got labeled as "rude." Here's my appeal: "Resign" is my constructive suggestion. "Impotent" means "unable to take effective action." "Quisling" is a politician who collaborates with an occupying force. 1/2

06.08.2025 19:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If I'm counting correctly, this is just one of six Trump nominees that were confirmed with at least one Democrat supporting vote. Today, Saturday, August 2, 2025. Straight up collaborator behavior.

03.08.2025 02:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Starting next week I'm going to cut the first five years of work experience out without changing anything else and see what happens. If I start getting more HR screens then maybe I'll cut more experience.

03.08.2025 02:04 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I've been using a browser extension that fills the apps out for me, so I figured why not give them all the details? I can't believe it's just now reading this that I'm realizing how easily an AI could be screening me out even without malice on the part of recruiters. πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

03.08.2025 01:57 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Chicago Jews say: LET GAZA LIVE Join Chicago area rabbis and cantors Monday, August 4, 2025
4:30-5:15 PM
500 West Madison St., Chicago 
(In front of the Israeli Consulate)
No flags please

Chicago Jews say: LET GAZA LIVE Join Chicago area rabbis and cantors Monday, August 4, 2025 4:30-5:15 PM 500 West Madison St., Chicago (In front of the Israeli Consulate) No flags please

CHICAGO!

Yidden especially!

MONDAY!

TURN OUT!

PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD!!

Please get this out to all your networks!!

02.08.2025 00:14 β€” πŸ‘ 305    πŸ” 140    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 4

American Jewish institutions will never wash their hands clean of this sanctioning of the murder of children. Of men. Of brothers. Of women. Of aunties. Of grandfathers. Of mothers. Of people.

Shande shande shande on all of you

25.07.2025 18:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2550    πŸ” 546    πŸ’¬ 38    πŸ“Œ 21

republicans literally try to kill us and democrats vote for them to run our government

15.07.2025 16:24 β€” πŸ‘ 172    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 2
There is no such thing as liberalism β€” or progressivism, etc.

There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation.

There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. β€œThe king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual.

As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself β€” backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

There is no such thing as liberalism β€” or progressivism, etc. There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation. There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely. Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. β€œThe king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual. As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself β€” backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

Then the appearance arises that the task is to map β€œliberalism”, or β€œprogressivism”, or β€œsocialism”, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism.

No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get:

The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone. Then the appearance arises that the task is to map β€œliberalism”, or β€œprogressivism”, or β€œsocialism”, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism. No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get: The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

I think it's now possible to make a poli-sci course that equips one for modern political analysis better than most classic theory and has a syllabus sourced entirely from random internet posts.

Text 1. Wilhoit's Law, born as part of a 2018 blog comment
crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/l...

13.07.2025 01:07 β€” πŸ‘ 3687    πŸ” 1137    πŸ’¬ 187    πŸ“Œ 244

The important thing to understand about the current state of affairs is that Andreessen hired a partner at the most influential VC firm in the tech industry solely on the basis that the man strangled a Black man to death in my neighborhood.

12.07.2025 16:11 β€” πŸ‘ 4261    πŸ” 1243    πŸ’¬ 69    πŸ“Œ 26

If you're American, consider this series of events β€”

Wednesday: We ask Republicans if they knew how many Americans have been killed in Palestine and Lebanon since 10/7. None did.

Thursday: Republicans & Democrats smile alongside Netanyahu.

Friday: Israeli settlers kill another American.

11.07.2025 22:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1078    πŸ” 445    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 12

Israel leads the world in child murder and has made Gaza have more child amputees per capita than anywhere in the world. Netanyahu is at the helm of their extermination & here are a bunch of Democrats including Cory Booker, who regularly quotes Angela Davis, posing with him

11.07.2025 02:01 β€” πŸ‘ 440    πŸ” 186    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 9

Rahm's gotta walk so a slightly less repellant centrist can run.

10.07.2025 01:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@grossnate is following 20 prominent accounts