Jakob Ohlhorst

Joachim Horvath, Steffen Koch & Michael G. Titelbaum (eds.), Methods in Analytic Philosophy: A Primer and Guide - PhilPapers Forthcoming guide with brief introductions on methods in analytic philosophy by experts on the relevant topics. With sections on: formal methods, argumentation, inferential methods, thought experiment...

This looks interesting.
#PhilSky #Philosophy

As Davidson teaches us, we couldn’t understand it if it weren’t

REF-optimizing, I see

Happy to have played a small role in this project (which will be continued)

Don’t worry the US has a long tradition of bullying Switzerland since the 30s or something

In my experience contributions in specialist journals are better situated in the debates, citing more of the relevant literature.
Generalist journal papers sometimes blissfully ignore longstanding debates. (Would ruin the “novelty” I guess)
Also what the others say

Came here to ask this

They put an llm behind the veil of ignorance!

Finnisch

Sorry

www.jstor.org/stable/2024121

Don't mind Robin, his book is great, and we (Nastja, Nora, and I) wouldn't have been able to make these criticisms without Robin's groundwork!

This is a video of a bear on a trampoline. Whatever argument you may or may not have tonight is invalid.

Friedman, Michel - Interview mit Horst Mahler und Sylvia Stolz (2007) : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Friedman, Michel - Interview mit Horst Mahler und Sylvia Stolz (2007, 89 S.)

archive.org/details/Frie...
Das da?

I’m more sceptical of dinosaurs having colours, the past was monochrome

JUST ONE MORE INTERPRETATION OF THE HERR-KNECHT-SZENE JUST ONE MORE INTERPRETATION JUST ONE MORE BRO I SWEAR

Wittgenstein and Social Epistemology Cambridge Core - Philosophy: General Interest - Wittgenstein and Social Epistemology

Annalisa Coliva - 'Wittgenstein and Social Epistemology', free to download for the next two weeks - it's presumably in part building on her chapter in the handbook, which was on social hinge epistemology:

German academic publishers:

Wittgenstein, On Certainty and Religion Wittgenstein, On Certainty and Religion  Although Wittgenstein did not write extensively about religion, his scattered comments and lecture notes have had a lasting impact on the philosophy of re...

I’m co-hosting an online conference: Wittgenstein, On Certainty and Religion, July 28th and 29th.

For more info, including schedule & book of abstracts: philevents.org/event/show/1...

(to join, email me, d.ellis@leedstrinity.ac.uk for a link)
#conference #philosophy #religion #Wittgenstein

Still I’d wager, the fact that delusions with specific contents occur is a causal product of the interactions with llms.
Drug abuse or schizophrenia do not necessarily produce delusions per se.
Delusions can be a fairly harmless symptom, but certain contents are dangerous

This is my ballpark: these people get what’s called induced delusion or folie a deux. It isn’t its own diagnosis anymore since the dsm5/icd11 because cases are arguably always anchored in preexisting conditions, so you’re right: drug abuse, depression, latent schizophrenia etc are there first

“Customers find the book offers good value for money, with one mentioning it provides helpful background information about different ideas. The writing quality receives positive feedback, with one customer noting the style is easy to digest.”

AI review. Guessed the book? Durkheim On Suicide.

So that’s why storm troopers always miss

- Modal logic more specifically
- Fodorianism
- depending on how you conceive of success: utilitarianism and Kantianism (can’t reconcile them that easily, but can’t get rid of them either)

Philosophy Sky: What are your examples of long-term successful philosophical ideas or theories? I'm looking for counterexamples to a pessimistic meta-induction about philosophy. 3 of mine:
-externalism about meaning and reference.
-modern logic and applications to language
-Gettier cases

I guess Kant and Aristotle will have to duke it out. Really shocking that they'd disagree

Also note Kant‘s point in the doctrine of virtue that, in a sense, doing the right thing against your inclination is more virtuous, as it just depends on your knowledge that it is the right thing to do

To me it looks like he’s answering someone’s question, so part of it is the clipping. And he clearly has a crowd to whom he’s talking, telling them that it’s cheap calling yourself progressive and in favour of social justice. There’s no mention of ordinary people who have to work together.