Informed Experts Strongly Support Nuclear Deployment in Australia โ Australian Nuclear Association
Top models to follow: ๐จ๐ฆ Canada (32%), ๐ซ๐ท France (22%), and ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea (24%) as the best examples for Australia to emulate in building a successful nuclear program.
Full survey to be found here www.nuclearaustralia.org.au/informed-exp...
15.05.2025 13:20 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
85% of nuclear experts agree: ๐ง๐ผ ๐๐๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ณ๐๐น๐น๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐น๐ผ๐ ๐ป๐๐ฐ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ด๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐ฎ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ ๐๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐ฒ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐.
In the Australian Nuclear Association member survey, highly experienced nuclear professionals were asked about the best approach for Australia.
15.05.2025 13:20 โ
๐ 3
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Our 2025 survey of professionals with an actual background in nuclear science and technology shows that those who are informed on the topic have different expectations than those who are not.
11.05.2025 23:41 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
In the Australian Nuclear Association member survey, highly experienced nuclear professionals were asked about the cost of nuclear energy compared to other clean energy sources in the Australian energy mix...
www.nuclearaustralia.org.au/informed-exp...
07.05.2025 21:01 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
In 2025, the Australian Nuclear Association surveyed its members, who are highly experienced nuclear professionals, to gauge expert opinion on nuclear energy deployment in Australia.
The results highlight that the main barriers are political and cultural, not technical or economic.
07.05.2025 00:36 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Informed Experts Strongly Support Nuclear Deployment in Australia โ Australian Nuclear Association
MEDIA RELEASE: 1 May 2025.
Too often, decisions are being shaped by commentary instead of competence.
Itโs time for a debate led by evidence, not ideology. ๐๐ ๐ฒ๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐, ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐.
๐ Read the full results here: www.nuclearaustralia.org.au/informed-exp...
02.05.2025 22:01 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
The results?
โ
Strong support for nuclear in Australia
โ
Strong belief that Australia could manage it safely and effectively
โ Frustration with Australiaโs self-doubt, despite its high technical and
governance capability
02.05.2025 22:01 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
MEDIA RELEASE: ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ด๐น๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ก๐๐ฐ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ๐น๐ผ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐ฎ
What do ๐ข๐ค๐ต๐ถ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฆ๐น๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ต๐ด think?
We surveyed informed professionals: people with nuclear training, engineering and science backgrounds, and experience.
02.05.2025 22:01 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
โ๐ ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ค๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ, ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ต ๐ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ณ๐บ ๐ข๐ฃ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ค๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด๐ต๐ฆ"
Itโs a real concern that many people have. In this clip, ANA member Vahishta Bhasin, explains how nuclear waste is managed, stored, and handled under strict controls.
01.05.2025 06:46 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
๐๐ฆโ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ด๐ต๐ข๐ณ๐ต๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ด๐ค๐ณ๐ข๐ต๐ค๐ฉ. ๐ช๐ฒโ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐.
28.04.2025 23:34 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 1
Other countries have done it. ๐๐ฆ ๐ค๐ข๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฐ.
Here, ANA member Helen Cook explains why we're in a great position to begin.
28.04.2025 09:25 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
And itโs no different than how Australia has handled coal plants for decades.
23.04.2025 22:10 โ
๐ 6
๐ 1
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Water is a common concern when it comes to nuclear. Luckily, the reality is that there's no special thirst for water when it comes to reactors - the water is returned to where it came from.
23.04.2025 08:35 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
๐๐ฐ๐ณ๐ณ๐ช๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ค๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ค๐ฉ ๐ธ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ?
Here, John Harries explains how nuclear stacks up in terms of water use, and why the comparison to other energy sources matters.
23.04.2025 08:35 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
โ๐๐ถ๐ต ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ญ๐ช๐ข ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฏโ๐ต ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ข๐ฑ๐ข๐ฃ๐ช๐ญ๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ค๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ...โ
Really? The UAE had no previous nuclear industry, and yet it built four nuclear reactors on time and on budget.
In this video, ANA member Hasliza Omar highlights what the UAE proves.
21.04.2025 23:06 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Nuclear energy is an ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐, not a loss.
Because of the return on investment, itโs ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ด๐ต ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐จ-๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฎ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ท๐ฆ๐ด๐ต๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ด ๐ธ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ข๐ฏ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ.
21.04.2025 03:31 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Judging by the public conversation in Australia, the main argument is to ban a technology because it is assumed to be too expensive.
Is this the right way to approach energy policy?
18.04.2025 00:22 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Other countries are paying to increase the amount of nuclear capacity available to power clean, reliable grids. They're able to evaluate accurate cost assessments, since vendors can propose their technology.
Meanwhile, Australiaโs experts are locked out, not by science, but by legislation.
17.04.2025 09:11 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
๐๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ช๐ต ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ง๐ฐ๐ณ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ญ๐ช๐ข ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ข ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ค๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ค๐ข๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ช๐ต ๐ช๐ด ๐ฆ๐น๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ด๐ช๐ท๐ฆ?
Mark Ho, President of the Australian Nuclear Association, speaks to this puzzling aspect of our energy policy.
17.04.2025 09:11 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
โIsnโt nuclear too expensive?โ
Not if we use standardised designs, repeat construction, and license pre-approved reactors just like other countries have done.
This isnโt about nuclear being costly. Itโs about how you manage the project.
15.04.2025 22:02 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0