why do you say it is more common?
07.12.2025 21:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@heiman.bsky.social
Associate Professor of Genetics Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital It should be fun, or what's the point? http://heimanlab.com
why do you say it is more common?
07.12.2025 21:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0and here I thought that was from Johnny Cash! genius.com/Johnny-cash-...
07.12.2025 21:42 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Second that!
26.11.2025 12:22 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0sorry that went right over my squid-like head the first time
25.11.2025 19:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I received this in Aug 2011. We still found ways to write nonsense before AI!
25.11.2025 19:48 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The other five are pretty amazing too!!
25.11.2025 00:16 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Before LLMs we still got many copy-paste materials! My favorite was a CV that started "My squid-like head is a masterful problem solver and I hope that I can bring world domination to your organization." If you google the first phrase you can find dozens! They unwittingly copied a joke C'thulhu CV.
24.11.2025 15:52 β π 17 π 2 π¬ 1 π 1in other news my final exam questions are ready earlier than ever before
23.11.2025 02:36 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The key to getting any task done is having another task that you want to do even less.
23.11.2025 02:06 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0our top choice (for ease and convenience, not gold standard) for C. elegans proteins is still expressing tagged versions in S2 cells (which grow 20-25Β°C) and co-IP, combined with some in vivo evidence like colocalization, localization of A depends on B, etc
22.11.2025 13:31 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So proud of my newest lab member!
19.11.2025 16:57 β π 6 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0This all makes sense to me except (1) the tants should go higher and (2) what does it need with pockets??
20.11.2025 00:13 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Movie scene, riding the luck dragon Falkor from The Never Ending Story
Falkor?
15.11.2025 13:19 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0#aECM Cub starts next week Nov 18 with talks on patterning the Drosophila lens, mouse tectorial membrane, and C.elegans cuticle furrows. You can still sign up for access using the link below.
14.11.2025 11:56 β π 7 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0where is the Brownian ratchet??
14.11.2025 01:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0High-efficiency targeted integration of extrachromosomal arrays in C. elegans using PhiC31 integrase https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.11.687718v1
13.11.2025 02:32 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Graphical summary representing strategies for deciphering temporalβspatial phosphoproteomic outcomes of primary cilia signaling in different biological contexts.
In this Opinion piece, Rachel Turn, Mohammad Ovais Aziz-Zanjani, Anushweta Asthana & Peter Jackson highlight strategies for multiplexing diverse approaches to map transient phosphorylations driving ciliary function & G0 in health versus disease.
#JCSciliaSI
journals.biologists.com/jcs/article/...
Wut.
A.I. is to intelligence what a scarecrow is to a human. Sure, some birds might confuse them, but that does not make them the same.
I agree, I think CGC dues us probably the best proxy - hadn't thought of that before
07.11.2025 22:43 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0that's good as a high end probably, I think that's more like all the labs that have ever been (minus a smaller number without lab codes). consistent with a guess of around 500-800ish currently?
07.11.2025 22:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0That's about what I guesstimated but nice to hear you thinking that way too. I got there because I think I remember there were ~200ish R01s ~ten years ago (before R35 shift), some people had more than one, some had NSF/other, many non-US, but ~500-750 (1000 at high end) seemed like a good guess.
07.11.2025 22:35 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Not sure - paper, preprint, or research grant (incl. startup) in last 5 years?
I guess CGC annual dues could be a good estimate too.
How many (active) C. elegans labs are there?
07.11.2025 16:49 β π 5 π 3 π¬ 6 π 0I mean, it's pretty clear. It refers to peer review members disclosing any information about the applications being reviewed.
It's clearly not limiting the guidance NIH can provide or the general freedom of people to complain about typos etc as long as it's not connected to the apps they review.
In my view it's 100% a breach of confidentiality and review integrity.
"Confidentiality in NIH peer review prohibits a peer reviewer member from: [...]
Disclosing, **in any manner**, information about the committee deliberations, discussions, evaluations, or documents [...]"
emphasis added
I thought the "most dangerous animal in the world" was us!
30.10.2025 21:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0From the lab of Maxwell Heiman discussing the interesting topic of apical ECM and the function of sensing organs and how these ECM proteins can both mechanically and biochemically modulate the organ's functions.
doi.org/10.1016/j.cd...
The ECM is no longer in the back seat when it comes to development. Check out our special issue "Dynamics of the extracellular matrix in development, cell physiology and disease" with 8 selected articles to learn more: A π§΅ www.sciencedirect.com/special-issu...
30.10.2025 17:48 β π 24 π 16 π¬ 1 π 1Excited to share our latest work on a new cilia disassembly pathway and a link between this pathway and the neurological disorder focal cortical dysplasia: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
Brief summary: we used a genome-wide CRISPRa GOF screen to identify negative regulators of ciliary signaling...
Micropublication @micropub7n.bsky.social is peer reviewed and PubMed indexed. A great way to get the data out in uncertain times
ππΌ