What made me think it was malignant transformation of a KA is that the regression crateriform area has different ihc pattern, with wt p16 and p53, and very low ki-67.
11.09.2025 05:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0@rmazorra.bsky.social
What made me think it was malignant transformation of a KA is that the regression crateriform area has different ihc pattern, with wt p16 and p53, and very low ki-67.
11.09.2025 05:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Do you think it is invasive or in situ? I struggle with this kinda"pushing" lesions...
10.09.2025 10:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0P16
P16
P53
P53 (lost in the atypical zone)
Immuno. Ki-67 not pictured (was low on the crateriform area, and very high on the atypical zona).
I belive this is a SCC arising on a keratoacanthoma. What do you think @racarr51.bsky.social ?
Detail of the atypical area
10.09.2025 09:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@racarr51.bsky.social Lesion clinically suggestive of keratoacanthoma
10.09.2025 09:55 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0Trichilemmal Carcinoma?
08.09.2025 11:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, but the online version has now changed to the "print" versiΓ³n, so there's no p16 anymore either :( fortunately I have your papers!
08.09.2025 09:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Hi! Why did they not include info and patterns of p16 in the print version of the WHO Skin blue book? There were some hints in the former beta version but no mention at all in the actual print version...
05.09.2025 09:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0