LC's Avatar

LC

@uncannyjane.bsky.social

a historian and her silken windhound

51 Followers  |  101 Following  |  16 Posts  |  Joined: 20.01.2025
Posts Following

Posts by LC (@uncannyjane.bsky.social)

Do it Seth! Mr Milkshake dance - Severance
YouTube video by Sandgrain Studio Do it Seth! Mr Milkshake dance - Severance

youtube.com/shorts/I1_1-...

19.03.2025 06:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A dark brown Silken Windhound dog with a long face and big perked ears lays down in fresh snow  and stares at the camera

A dark brown Silken Windhound dog with a long face and big perked ears lays down in fresh snow and stares at the camera

Meet Fig

16.02.2025 16:30 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Elon Musk is a terrible president.

03.02.2025 22:34 β€” πŸ‘ 52704    πŸ” 15088    πŸ’¬ 1622    πŸ“Œ 1074

Is it even gonna be only 207 weeks though? They’re already trying to remove presidential term limits

28.01.2025 18:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

#MILKSHAKE

27.01.2025 02:18 β€” πŸ‘ 6096    πŸ” 644    πŸ’¬ 176    πŸ“Œ 97

I think that’s why there’s melon ball parties and pineapple gifts lol Very mid-century coded. Who is gifting pineapples and having melon ball parties in the 21st century? I don’t think the anachronisms are purely aesthetic or Lumon messing with the innies perceptions. There’s other old tech too

25.01.2025 18:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think it’s set in an alternate 70s/80s period where Lumon shifted the trajectory of technology development from what we know in our own world

25.01.2025 17:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

gonna keep sharing this joke forever. it’s my obligation as an architectural historian/historian

24.01.2025 22:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You keep throwing out things distracting from the topic at hand, hence talking in circles, and are now being straight up rude. I already tried to exit this conversation respectfully. You just want a fight. Since you won’t leave me be, I’m blocking you.

24.01.2025 03:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 23.01.2025 22:33 β€” πŸ‘ 95    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Also, since we’re going in circles and you keep using a pejorative term, I’m done with this conversation. Goodnight.

24.01.2025 01:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

As far as proof of intent, several court cases have upheld the 14th includes people born to non-citizens regardless of legal status. So have 100s of years of proof of the law's meaning. And we have the FFs writings on immigration that supported open immigration to non-criminals

24.01.2025 01:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Dude, I’m literally saying it’s been about race the whole time? What are you yelling at? It’s also incorrect to say the founding fathers didn’t want a central bank. Alexander Hamilton was a founding father and pushed for it. The founding fathers weren’t in agreement on all topics.

24.01.2025 01:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

As long as you weren’t a murderer, thief, polygamist, etc., you were able to get citizenship based on a short period residency. Coming to American and living here was not on its own a crime until recently, historically speaking.

24.01.2025 01:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Correcting myself on the date of a law doesn’t make me not thorough. My point stands that laws limiting the legality of immigration have historically been about race, largely to limit immigration of people of color, and that the founding fathers were vocally open to what is now β€œillegal immigration”

24.01.2025 01:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In today’s definition that’d be illegal immigration. History shows it’s clear the founding fathers, several of which were immigrants and through official comments, supported open immigration of people with good character. That would include most of today’s illegal immigrants who don’t commit crimes

23.01.2025 16:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Though, I was mistaken on one thing, the 1790 Naturalization Act reduced citizenship to white people for a time. Any white person who came to the U.S. could apply for citizenship after 2 yrs of residency as they committed no crimes. But it did not make just coming here illegal in any way for whites

23.01.2025 16:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m literally a historian and did double check the dates before commenting since we (working historians) don’t memorize the exact dates for everything like schoolchildren but go off

23.01.2025 15:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

There was not a concept of illegal immigration when it was written in the 1860s. It wasn’t until two decades later with the Chinese Exclusion Act that illegal immigration became a thingβ€” specifically as a racist tool. People just showed up and applied for citizenship before that.

23.01.2025 15:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Just made a donation to Wikipedia. I encourage you to do the same if you can
donate.wikimedia.org/w/index.php

21.01.2025 21:44 β€” πŸ‘ 3769    πŸ” 843    πŸ’¬ 155    πŸ“Œ 78