The fact that that lane even exists is a sad thing
29.11.2025 13:58 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@hughsbailey.bsky.social
Policy director, Open Communities Alliance, Connecticut
The fact that that lane even exists is a sad thing
29.11.2025 13:58 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Why does she care about this so much, besides being an excuse to be a terrible person?
29.11.2025 13:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Tough break for CT 169 Strong
www.ctpost.com/connecticut/...
Glad to see Greenwich is handling this so well. Keep it up, guys
greenwichfreepress.com/letter-to-th...
Hey remember that idea that Erin Stewart might be better on housing because some good things had happened in New Britain? That was funny
www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/e...
It's maybe the best policy to do the most good in the shortest time frame and it will never happen.
20.11.2025 15:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 01. No kidding
2. Best of luck on that one
Should CT redraw its school district boundaries? It could mean less segregation, fairer funding, a new report says www.ctpost.com/news/educati...
βNewtown is a good town, but it is desperately missing condos, starter homes for those who want to start here, and homes for seniors who want to stay here,β said Samuel Grummons. βWe can partner with developers in good faith instead of fighting them in expensive litigation.β Fellow Newtown resident Christine Updegraff agreed. βI understand the frustration about mandates from Hartford, but the pressures are coming from within; there is a growing gap between what it costs to live here and what an ordinary person can afford,β Updegraff said. βIf we are going to add 300 units, I think Mount Pleasant Road near I-84 makes sense.β
It's legitimately nice to see a story highlight people saying why this is a good idea and should be approved
Attorney for 300-unit apartment plan in Newtown says CT law is on his side: βI win in courtβ www.newstimes.com/news/article...
But Republicans sounded alarm bells, saying the legislation would take away local control. βThis is monumental,β said Senate Republican leader Stephen Harding of Brookfield. βThis is statewide zoning. β¦ Itβs quite scary, frankly.β
Scary, Steven Harding? What are you scared of?
www.courant.com/2025/11/16/h...
βI truly believe that this is going to be a bill that we look back upon as a monumental step in the implementation of statewide zoning efforts,β said Senate Minority Leader Stephen Harding, R-Brookfield.
We should be so lucky, Stephen Harding.
14.11.2025 19:50 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Sen. Saud Anwar, D-South Windsor, said after the housing veto and discussions over spending in the wake of federal cuts, he wonders whether Lamont βis even in touch with the reality of what the people in the state of Connecticut are experiencing. βI think the number of people who are experiencing unhoused status and homelessness is increasing in our state. For a state which is one of the richest per capita in the United States and also of the richest country in the world, to allow that to happen and not have an intervention, and despite multiple advocates, community members, reaching out to the governor, and his unwillingness to address this in a meaningful manner is painful to me,β Anwar said Thursday, of the veto.
Now that's a ringing endorsement from a fellow party member if I've ever heard one.
ctmirror.org/2025/11/14/c...
Wait Hearst CT has had like 10 stories on the Mamdani effect so now I don't know what to believe
14.11.2025 16:13 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0βWeβre building more housing today than we have in the last five or 10 years, but not fast enough,β Lamont said. βThis bill makes sure we build housing where mayors want to put it. Mayors take the lead, and the state will be their partner to make sure it gets built.β
A few things. One, the governor loves to say stuff that has been proven false. At this point, whatever.
Two, how about those mayors that want to put it nowhere? What does this bill do about that? Unclear, at best.
Towns have always been able to take the lead. They don't, which is why we're here
If approved, the measure would reestablish Connecticutβs housing agenda on voluntary participation, measurable incentives, and infrastructure support. It would direct the Department of Housing to coordinate regional assessments through councils of governments, create funding tiers for towns that expand zoning near transit, and streamline small-project permitting under 16 units.
Voluntary participation! Man, I wish someone had thought of that before.
10.11.2025 15:48 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0A criticism of the earlier bill was that it was too prescriptive. Mary Calorio, regional town manager for Canterbury, Chaplin, and Pomfret, said the new version βbalances statewide goals with local realities.β βThe original housing allotment didnβt fully consider infrastructureβwater, sewer, transportation,β she said. βThis bill supports a regional approach calling for a comprehensive housing-needs assessment for every region. Housing needs donβt stop at our town lines.β
A good example of small towns still, even in supporting the new bill, using infrastructure as a reason why their hands are tied. There's a lot you can do, in fact
10.11.2025 15:46 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0With a special legislative session scheduled this week to pass a bill aimed at addressing the issue, Gov. Ned Lamont, legislative leaders, and a coalition of local officials gathered in East Hartford to unveil what they called a reset: a bipartisan housing proposal that replaces the mandates of the vetoed House Bill 5002 with incentives, infrastructure investment, and regional planning.
But what if the mandates were what we need?
CT's New Housing Proposal Heads To Special Legislative Session ctnewsjunkie.com/2025/11/10/c...
Read all the way to the end:
Sonnenfeld replied, βShould we write you up as a profile in courage?β
www.ctpost.com/politics/art...
Not to be lost among all the higher-profile races yesterday, Casetti losing in Ansonia is pretty satisfying
UPSET IN ANSONIA, TYSZKA DEFEATS CASSETTI valley.newhavenindependent.org/2025/11/04/u...
Bridgeport is moving in the right direction with balanced budgets, higher credit ratings, and exciting new development projects. But thereβs no doubt that Bridgeportβs reputation has been a drag on its success. Understanding this reality, the Charter Revision Commission made ethics reform a centerpiece of charter revision, turning what is currently a single paragraph in the charter to an entire chapter.
It's cool to work in the Ganim administration and make vague references to "Bridgeport's reputation" holding the city back. I wonder what that refers to?
ctmirror.org/2025/11/03/m...
βWhen you have a five-story, 75-unit building on a 4.3-acre lot, on a narrow street with no sidewalks and limited access Ββ you know, thatβs a public safety concern and a lot of people are upset and rightfully so,β said Allie-Brennan. He noted a fatal hit-and-run that occurred earlier this year up the street, saying adding more cars to the area would make it, βeven more concerning.β
A lot going on in this story, but I just want to focus on this quote from maybe the most anti-housing Democrat in the state.
Four acres is a lot of space. You're trying to make it sound like it's being jammed in to a tiny lot, but it's just not true
insideinvestigator.org/denials-and-...
I guess I missed where these guys were focusing their efforts on those five factors. CT 169 all in on cutting lumber costs, apparently.
03.11.2025 15:02 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0CT Gen Stat Β§ 8-30g intention to provide βaffordable housingβ while the intent may be noble is going to destroy this town.
The thing to understand when people say stuff like this -- new housing will "destroy" Newtown -- is that the town is immense. It's the fifth-largest town by area in the state. Nearly 60 square miles. Most people won't notice anything
www.newtownbee.com/10302025/on-...
Good thing no oneβs doing that! Come on, letβs not do this again
30.10.2025 23:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Was silence not an option?
www.wshu.org/connecticut-...
Not really, but thanks for spreading a story that basically makes stuff up
ctnewsjunkie.com/2025/10/30/q...
Who cares if they build a gas station, but if people say their town's farm character is threatened by a development on a site that is literally a former car dealership, you're not obligated to believe them
www.newstimes.com/news/article...
Everything's fine! Everyone means well. Everyone is doing their best. Everyone likes me, right? Of course they do.
28.10.2025 14:27 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In sum, the governor continues to make stuff up about housing. Good times.
28.10.2025 14:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"There's a lot of conversation on intent."
Indeed. How about zoning? Maybe towns should have to change their zoning to allow affordable housing to be built? Anyone considered that?
Here's the explanation: βDespite this progress, the ripple effect of the pandemic β which is now being felt β along with high interest rates, tariffs, supply chain disruptions and material costs or access, have hampered construction.β
Wow, good thing no other states dealt with a pandemic.