Can someone who is into the nomenclature explain to me if Pete Hegseth is a centaur or a cyborg with respect to AI?
02.03.2026 17:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Can someone who is into the nomenclature explain to me if Pete Hegseth is a centaur or a cyborg with respect to AI?
02.03.2026 17:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0I think about this Tony Benn speech much more than I used to
28.02.2026 16:09 — 👍 12375 🔁 5008 💬 78 📌 166One of my unfounded conspiracy theories about generative AI is that to fake the "intelligence" they simply packed in a very high unpredictability factor. Rogue actions feel like a choice, a decision of intellect, while predictability does not; predictability is already served by non-AI software.
27.02.2026 14:02 — 👍 489 🔁 81 💬 24 📌 15wint @dril drunk driving may kill a lot of people, but it also helps a lot of people get to work on time, so, it;s impossible to say if its bad or not, 18:20 09 May 14
2 years of seeing my friends and colleagues in the climate movement doing this has radicalised me
27.02.2026 10:27 — 👍 162 🔁 24 💬 0 📌 0
i’m tired of every paper (even critical ones) on societal impact of AI starting by both-siding the “benefits” and risks/harms of AI
in academia, i would like us to arrive at a collective reckoning that we don’t need to play both sides. it's totally legit to clearly state just the harms. period
Purple aka bewitched aka mind-controlled aka evil minions.
The so-called AI era feels like the part of a Despicable Me movie where all the minions have turned purple.
27.02.2026 13:23 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I see my friend @malk-zameth.bsky.social is doing a talk on "out of the tar pit" and would love to do an "into the tar pit" co-talk at some point.
27.02.2026 13:12 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Etymology of superfluous, composite of "super" meaning "over" and "fluere" meaning "to flow".
"Stack superfluous"
27.02.2026 10:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Nobody wants to know what you and your chatbot talked about
19.08.2025 13:33 — 👍 183 🔁 29 💬 5 📌 6Evergreen.
27.02.2026 09:50 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Har sagt dette mange ganger, men: hvis du driver med NOE SOM HELST KREATIVT og bruker AI til å promotere det er jeg ikke interessert. Du kan spille i verdens kuleste band. Er plakaten eller platecoveret AI kommer jeg ikke til å sjekke dere ut.
26.02.2026 23:00 — 👍 74 🔁 12 💬 1 📌 1From a discussion in RISF based on the old IBM adage, an updated version for the modern era:
19.02.2026 15:41 — 👍 50 🔁 20 💬 1 📌 1Here's the claim: we choose an architecture (e.g. microservices) to avoid doing design (defining how things should work).
26.02.2026 12:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Software developers be like what’s the purpose of architecture if I still have to design?
25.02.2026 14:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Reminder that unless you can trace the actual source of a quote, it's fake.
25.02.2026 12:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Mark Twain and Benjamin Franklin uttered fewer self-help gems than one might think.
25.02.2026 12:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
In my slide decks, I've started including quotes of what AI leaders believe to be true, and helps break through the notion that they are some sort of genius magicians.
This context matters, if you are to decide about using and trusting (!) the products they make.
Have said it before and will say it again: No one will ever convince me that a machine or artificial system deserves more rights and dignity than the human with the least. If your project is convincing me of the worth of the former, better out your resources into improving that of the latter.
24.02.2026 00:43 — 👍 24 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0...while delivering fish of slowly deteriorating quality.
19.02.2026 21:18 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Teach a man to fish and you'll feed him for a lifetime, sell a man a subscription for fish and he'll grow dependent upon you for survival and you can jack up the price over time.
19.02.2026 21:08 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Can't wait to have an order of magnitude more of that.
19.02.2026 12:16 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Code is computational microplastics.
19.02.2026 12:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yeah and we're looking at a tremendous conservative lock-in force to keep using those technologies, building an unprecedented amount of those same bloated, dependency-heavy, vulnerability-prone SPAs. Bloated SPAs that are imitations of bloated SPAs. Terrible architecture and terrible UX at scale.
18.02.2026 18:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0600 submissions is crazy.
18.02.2026 17:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0How many slots?
18.02.2026 17:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Oh wow looks like I'm going to Antwerp in June.
18.02.2026 17:41 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0D'oh! Maybe try submitting to some other conferences as well? Sounds like a talk I'd like to see :-)
18.02.2026 17:14 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
I find this whole "AI agent wrote a hit piece" thing really troubling for reasons that have nothing to do with bots getting "mad" and "deciding" to take down open source contributors. theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-...
Why do we keep wanting to give AI so much agency that it lets humans off the hook??
"From whatever to non sequitur: a guide to AI-generated talk titles"
17.02.2026 20:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Screenshot from YouTube, with an AI-generated summary of my talk on "The AI puppet dance", enthusiastically stating "Witness a puppet show, but with AI!"
Good Grief!
17.02.2026 17:31 — 👍 7 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0