marianne eloise's Avatar

marianne eloise

@marianneeloise.bsky.social

all i got’s a moped writer, vegan, sea witch πŸŒΏπŸ„πŸŒŠπŸ‘»πŸŒΈ www.marianneeloise.com

525 Followers  |  259 Following  |  150 Posts  |  Joined: 28.04.2023  |  2.0745

Latest posts by marianneeloise.bsky.social on Bluesky

saw someone ask grok if something was funny or not πŸ˜”

05.08.2025 12:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
A summer catch up New projects, ley lines, Cornwall, and one very immortal dog

i wrote a blog. happy summer

open.substack.com/pub/marianne...

04.08.2025 14:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
THE CHOLLA GAZETTE | Substack THE CHOLLA GAZETTE is a newsletter about places, people and the planet. Click to read THE CHOLLA GAZETTE, a Substack publication. Launched a month ago.

on friday i’ll be posting the insider’s guide to brighton 🌊 ft. my favourite vegetarian indian food, authentic tacos, independent shops and more. please subscribe and share!:

chollagazette.substack.com

14.07.2025 20:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Media's Pivot to AI Is Not Real and Not Going to Work AI is not going to save media companies, and forcing journalists to use AI is not a business model.

Media outlets can't pivot to AI to save themselves. It's not a business strategy and it's not going to work. The only path forward is for journalists to lean into their humanity, to do things AI can't, and to make clear they are writing for people, not algorithms:

www.404media.co/the-medias-p...

14.07.2025 14:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2028    πŸ” 582    πŸ’¬ 31    πŸ“Œ 62
Preview
In search of England's ley lines A century-old quest β€’ Featuring vape shops β€’ RIP Evie

recently went searching for ley lines and ended up hanging out with some mormons. please read:

dispatch-media.com/in-search-of...

14.07.2025 13:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

if you would consider subscribing to our newsletter that would be very appreciated. thank you

08.07.2025 19:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Cholla Gazette: issue 002 Shoes made from grapes? Whatever next? Cheese made from peas?

good vegan cheese! shoes made from grapes! slow fashion! labubu fatigue! here are the things i recommend (and hate) this month:

chollagazette.substack.com/p/the-cholla...

08.07.2025 19:07 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

please subscribe to our newsletter about people, places and the planet 🌡🌞

chollagazette.substack.com

06.06.2025 12:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Vox piece with headline: "You’re being lied to about protein"
and description: "Yes, protein builds muscle. No, you don’t need as much as lifting influencers say." 

It has an illustration of several people shoving steak and a chicken leg into a giant prop stomach. Salami and other meats are on the ground surrounding.

Vox piece with headline: "You’re being lied to about protein" and description: "Yes, protein builds muscle. No, you don’t need as much as lifting influencers say." It has an illustration of several people shoving steak and a chicken leg into a giant prop stomach. Salami and other meats are on the ground surrounding.

A certain fitness writer has brain-poisoned women of my generation into thinking they need 1g protein per lb of bodyweight to gain muscle, they can't be fully plant-based, etc. It's all horseshit (as a muscular girlie, I would know!). So I decided to write about protein scienceπŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ

07.05.2025 15:05 β€” πŸ‘ 75    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0

for a start vegan leather is made from mushrooms, cactus, grapes…it isn’t always plastic. second the vegan goal is kind of no death ever for any reason lol either burgers or shoes

05.06.2025 15:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

big push against vegan leather atm. seen some people arguing that vegans should be fine with it because it’s a byproduct of the meat industry. how fucking stupid are you

05.06.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

god i can’t stop thinking about this. it’s just pure fucking evil

03.06.2025 00:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

unfortunately as a vegan i can’t do the β€œpropaganda i’m not falling for” trend without being annoying

28.05.2025 18:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

had a gorgeous time with my gorgeous family last week πŸŒΏπŸ„πŸ§šπŸ»πŸŒŠπŸŒ΄πŸŒΈπŸŒ±

28.05.2025 17:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

now why has no one commissioned me on this yet

28.05.2025 09:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

i think the real reason professors won’t just revert to paper essays is bc students just wouldn’t go to college anymore and college is a business

08.05.2025 09:54 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
You know what? Let's talk about why this bubble actually inflated!

So, let's start simple: the term "artificial intelligence" is bastardized to the point it effectively means nothing and everything at the same time. When people hear "AI" they think of an autonomous intelligence that can do things for them, and generative AI can "do things for you" like generate an image or text "from a simple prompt." As a result, it's easy to manipulate people who don't know much about tech into believing that this will naturally progress from "it can create a bunch of text for me that I have to write for my job just by me typing in a prompt" to "it can do my job for me just by typing in a prompt."

Basically everything you read about "the future of AI" extrapolates generative AI's ability to sort of generate something a human would make and turns it into do whatever a human can do, all because tech has, in the past, been bad at the beginning and linearly improved as time drags on. 

This illogical thinking underpins the entire generative AI boom, because we've found out exactly how many people do not know what the fuck they're talking about and are willing to believe the last semi-intelligent person they talked to. Generative AI is a remarkable con β€” a just-good-enough simulacrum of human expression to get it past the gatekeepers in finance and the media, knowing that neither will apply a second gear of critical thinking beyond "huh guess we're doing AI now."

The expectation that generative AI will transform into something much, much more powerful requires you to first ignore the existing limitations, believing it to be more capable than it is, and also ignore the fact that these models have yet to show meaningful improvement over the past few years. They still hallucinate. They’re still ungodly expensive to run. They’re still unreliable. And they still don’t do much.  

Worse still, ChatGPT's growth has galvanized these people into believing that this is a legitimate, meaningfu…

You know what? Let's talk about why this bubble actually inflated! So, let's start simple: the term "artificial intelligence" is bastardized to the point it effectively means nothing and everything at the same time. When people hear "AI" they think of an autonomous intelligence that can do things for them, and generative AI can "do things for you" like generate an image or text "from a simple prompt." As a result, it's easy to manipulate people who don't know much about tech into believing that this will naturally progress from "it can create a bunch of text for me that I have to write for my job just by me typing in a prompt" to "it can do my job for me just by typing in a prompt." Basically everything you read about "the future of AI" extrapolates generative AI's ability to sort of generate something a human would make and turns it into do whatever a human can do, all because tech has, in the past, been bad at the beginning and linearly improved as time drags on. This illogical thinking underpins the entire generative AI boom, because we've found out exactly how many people do not know what the fuck they're talking about and are willing to believe the last semi-intelligent person they talked to. Generative AI is a remarkable con β€” a just-good-enough simulacrum of human expression to get it past the gatekeepers in finance and the media, knowing that neither will apply a second gear of critical thinking beyond "huh guess we're doing AI now." The expectation that generative AI will transform into something much, much more powerful requires you to first ignore the existing limitations, believing it to be more capable than it is, and also ignore the fact that these models have yet to show meaningful improvement over the past few years. They still hallucinate. They’re still ungodly expensive to run. They’re still unreliable. And they still don’t do much. Worse still, ChatGPT's growth has galvanized these people into believing that this is a legitimate, meaningfu…

Think of it like this: if almost every single media outlet talked about one thing (generative AI), and that one thing was available from one company (OpenAI), wouldn't it look exactly how things look today? You've got OpenAI with hundreds of millions of monthly active users, and then a bunch of other companies β€” including big tech firms with multi-trillion dollar market caps β€” with somewhere between 10 and 69 million monthly active users.

What we're seeing is one company taking most of the users and money available and doing so because the media fucking helped them.  People aren't amazed by ChatGPT β€” they're curious! They're curious about why the media won't shut up about it!

Think of it like this: if almost every single media outlet talked about one thing (generative AI), and that one thing was available from one company (OpenAI), wouldn't it look exactly how things look today? You've got OpenAI with hundreds of millions of monthly active users, and then a bunch of other companies β€” including big tech firms with multi-trillion dollar market caps β€” with somewhere between 10 and 69 million monthly active users. What we're seeing is one company taking most of the users and money available and doing so because the media fucking helped them. People aren't amazed by ChatGPT β€” they're curious! They're curious about why the media won't shut up about it!

Generative AI is a remarkable con β€” a just-good-enough simulacrum of human expression to get it past the gatekeepers in finance and the media, knowing that neither will apply a second gear of critical thinking beyond "huh guess we're doing AI now." It's a disgrace.
www.wheresyoured.at/reality-check/

28.04.2025 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 638    πŸ” 100    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 9

Whenever I post about AI, without fail, someone ALWAYS defends it as a tool of convenience or short-term efficiency. You would think the past several decades would have taught people the lesson that short-term convenience doesn’t outweigh long-term consequences, but the lesson continues unlearned

29.04.2025 16:23 β€” πŸ‘ 848    πŸ” 159    πŸ’¬ 28    πŸ“Œ 5

yes you ran very far we’re all very impressed now how about you turn around and pick up all that shite you dropped

29.04.2025 15:25 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

the amount of litter and plastic waste dropped during marathons lol it’s so nasty we’re still finding energy gels in brighton and hove

29.04.2025 14:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
it’s me on john oliver

it’s me on john oliver

lol

28.04.2025 08:02 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The false climate solution that just won’t die A star-studded film explains the hope and hype behind regenerative agriculture.

Last week, I watched the popular regenerative ag film Kiss the Ground, and the new follow-up documentary Common Ground. The films' claims -- esp. around climate -- are even more hyperbolic than I knew: www.vox.com/future-perfe...

23.04.2025 12:59 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
My Body is a Bouquet How botanical tattoos help me immortalize what is impermanent.

β€œFlowers, like seasons and people, are temporary." How botanical tattoos help @marianneeloise.bsky.social immortalize what is impermanent 🌏:

22.04.2025 15:31 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
From Sex To Ghosting, These Are The Realities Of Dating With A Disability When Frances Ryan began researching her new book Who Wants To Be Normal?, she discovered that there's one part of life that's stuck in the dark ages for disabled women

β€œToΒ some, a woman sat in a wheelchair snogging her boyfriend is akin to seeing a fish on land. It just ain’t natural.” 

I wrote for Elle on attitudes to disability and sex (with some snippets from Who Wants Normal?) www.elle.com/uk/life-and-...

18.04.2025 19:06 β€” πŸ‘ 56    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

whether you mean it or not it gives β€œi’m not like THOSE autistics”. i am! we’re not different! i have so much more in common w a high support needs autistic person than i do with a sub human like, say, RFK

18.04.2025 18:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

lower support needs autistics please be better at supporting the more vulnerable among us and resist the temptation to insist on how much you can do. it’s OK if a person won’t ever live a β€œnormal” life. it doesn’t dictate their worth, joy or quality of life

18.04.2025 18:04 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

disabled people deserve full lives and rights and support even if they will never β€œcontribute” to society btw. obviously

18.04.2025 17:47 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

love talking to vegans. two smart empathetic bitches telling each other β€œexactlyyy”

17.04.2025 20:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image

🌸 email hi@cholla.agency and please share 🌸

17.04.2025 19:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

we need to make people who use AI feel stupid because they are. maybe then we’ll get somewhere

17.04.2025 19:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@marianneeloise is following 20 prominent accounts