Sherri O 💙 joyfuldays - Bluesky Statics

Dumb as a bag of hammers, he makes Noem look like a genius. They may have put him in there simply for the entertainment value...

05.03.2026 20:03 — 👍 2 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0

Donate to James Talarico if you care to here:
secure.actblue.com/donate/jt-tx...

17.02.2026 15:31 — 👍 4 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0

Defend the Clean Air Act—Stop the EPA Rollback Text SIGN PAMYXO to 50409 to send this to your officials.

resist.bot/petitions/PA...

13.02.2026 15:41 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1

AI is simply over-hyped, rehashed 'whatever'. Can't wait for this bubble to burst, so maybe we can effort something that makes life better for people and the Earth.

12.02.2026 16:01 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 5

I hope this photo haunts her for the rest of her life...

12.02.2026 14:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

A Maxwell Pardon Would Obstruct Justice and Signal Global Impunity Text SIGN PQWHLO to 50409 — The possibility that President Donald Trump could grant clemency to Ghislaine Maxwell now presents an immediate and grave threat to justice in one of the most extensive child sex-trafficking conspiracies in modern history. Maxwell was not a peripheral figure. She was the central facilitator of Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal enterprise and is now the only remaining senior participant serving a lawful sentence. She is openly seeking clemency while signaling—through her attorney—that she would only “testify fully and honestly” if a presidential pardon were granted in advance. That is not cooperation. It is leverage. Maxwell has now made this condition explicit, refusing to answer a single congressional question about Epstein’s co-conspirators while demanding clemency beforehand. A presidential pardon under these circumstances would permanently foreclose accountability, incentivize perjury, and function as obstruction of justice by executive decree. Once clemency is granted, Maxwell would face no legal consequence for false testimony that shields powerful individuals from prosecution. Recent congressional review of the Epstein files has dramatically intensified these concerns. After personally viewing unredacted materials, Jamie Raskin, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, accused the Department of Justice of making “completely unnecessary” redactions that concealed the names of alleged abusers while exposing identifying details of victims. He warned that these actions may violate federal law and deter survivors from coming forward. Members who reviewed the files have further confirmed that they include discussions of victims as young as nine years old, even as the identities of men described as “likely incriminated” remain inexplicably shielded. This is not transparency; it is a distortion of justice that protects the powerful at the expense of the vulnerable. The newly reviewed records also contradict President Trump’s public claims regarding his relationship with Epstein. Documents personally reviewed by members of Congress quote Trump as stating that Epstein was a guest at Mar-a-Lago and was never asked to leave—directly at odds with Trump’s repeated public assertions. This moment is not occurring in isolation. Democratic allies are responding very differently to the same revelations. In Norway, senior diplomats have resigned and now face criminal investigations for corruption and complicity tied to Epstein connections, with additional probes opened into other senior political figures. In the United Kingdom, authorities have indicated their willingness to assist law enforcement in ongoing inquiries related to Epstein’s ties to a former royal. These democracies are reopening cases, accepting institutional embarrassment, and insisting that proximity to power does not confer immunity. If the United States responds instead by granting executive clemency to the chief enabler of Epstein’s crimes, it will stand alone—not as a leader in justice, but as a cautionary example of how power protects itself. If Maxwell possesses information critical to prosecuting others, that testimony must be obtained through lawful means: under oath, under immunity agreements, subject to corroboration, and before any discussion of leniency. A pardon offered first would destroy the integrity of that process. I urge Congress to: • State unequivocally that a presidential pardon in this case would constitute an abuse of power. • Demand full, unredacted disclosure of the Epstein files to Congress. • Conduct immediate oversight hearings into DOJ redactions and prosecutorial interference. • Require sworn testimony from DOJ officials regarding redaction decisions that exposed victims while shielding alleged abusers. • Require disclosure of any communications between DOJ officials and Maxwell or her counsel concerning testimony, confinement conditions, or potential clemency. No one—especially those implicated in crimes against children—should be permitted to trade silence or fabricated exoneration for freedom. The American people understand what is at stake and expect Congress to defend the rule of law.

🖋️ “A Maxwell Pardon Would Obstruct Justice and Signal Global Impunity” hit 250 signers!

💬 Text SIGN PQWHLO to 50409

10.02.2026 07:23 — 👍 11 🔁 6 💬 1 📌 0

I found it here:
www.justice.gov/epstein/file...

08.02.2026 19:01 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

One would think so, but sometimes they remove documents they had previously made public. Shifting sands.

08.02.2026 18:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Draft statement announcing Jeffrey Epstein's death dated the day before he was found dead in his jail cell.

Reported by Olivia Ralph in the Daily Beast

Jeffrey Epstein died on August 10, 2019. Memo is dated August 9th, 2019

08.02.2026 14:37 — 👍 8 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 3

Check, once a psycho always a psycho...

03.02.2026 22:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Should be on every building, everywhere...

26.01.2026 18:15 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0

Everyone should speak out...

26.01.2026 14:07 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0

go.bsky.app/2uELVU1

24.01.2026 11:10 — 👍 44 🔁 16 💬 5 📌 2

Wouldn't you have to kill 'good' people to make heaven more crowded?

20.01.2026 14:33 — 👍 0 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0

go.bsky.app/8KZHged

14.01.2026 03:45 — 👍 103 🔁 57 💬 34 📌 14

Indeed...

14.01.2026 14:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

They are creating an atmosphere in which they 'can' say "the country is out of control, martial law, mid-terms are cancelled for the foreseeable future"...

12.01.2026 17:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Check out this stellar starter pack from @debbie156.bsky.social 💖
Thank you for including me in the mix of great friends and new alike! Y'all know what to do ✌️🐸 follow and share the love ❤️ 😍

go.bsky.app/NXsAg4P

10.01.2026 17:15 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0

The House can impeach all day long, but if the Senate doesn't convict by a two‑thirds vote, he can't be removed...

06.01.2026 14:31 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Did we invade Venezuela because María Corina Machado won the Nobel Peace Prize?

05.01.2026 14:39 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

These are monstrous people, rampant, mutant stupidity with hate in their hearts…

31.12.2025 23:35 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

If it’s not nailed down, he’ll try to monetize it…

27.12.2025 22:48 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0

We will fix, may take a while..

21.12.2025 02:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

go.bsky.app/JgGkv4z

17.12.2025 02:08 — 👍 128 🔁 79 💬 33 📌 14

Help report this account please. bsky.app/profile/isup...

14.12.2025 01:13 — 👍 2005 🔁 584 💬 852 📌 69

They had me at shrimp tacos…

07.12.2025 02:30 — 👍 12 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0

Cold Moon last night

06.12.2025 01:27 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

They probably just want to keep all that 'really good' news to themselves...

26.11.2025 17:02 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

You are not alone Steven...❤️

26.11.2025 02:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Posts by Sherri O 💙 (@joyfuldays.bsky.social)