The council decision on this was last night. After 9,000 pages and 4 years the decision was to......defer. More documents, more delay.
05.02.2026 09:12 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@michaeljahill.bsky.social
The council decision on this was last night. After 9,000 pages and 4 years the decision was to......defer. More documents, more delay.
05.02.2026 09:12 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Get the full story here: open.substack.com/pub/samdumit...
04.02.2026 13:11 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This process has taken four years.
And it still isnβt over.
Tonight, Hackneyβs planning committee can overrule the officers. They should.
It is impossible to comply with all the policy requirements at once. The refusal says the building is:
β’ Too tall
β’ Doesnβt have enough office space
β’ Doesnβt have enough housing
What would be allowed is never explained.
Best/worst of all the development was criticised for casting a shadow.....on itself. Buildings are literally required to be scared of their own shadow.
04.02.2026 13:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The developers are trying to comply with many policies that achieve the exact opposite of what they intend. Climate policies which increase emissions. Affordable workspace rules white reduce affordable workspace. Affordable housing rules which reduce affordable housing.
04.02.2026 13:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Their verdict?
The building doesnβt follow the βgrainβ of surrounding buildings. This is the kind of thing panel members design.
Local support was overwhelming. Hackney received 64 letters. 61 were in favour, including the local councillor @anyasizer.bsky.social. But what really matters is the view of planners and the 'Design Review Board'.
04.02.2026 13:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0To get this far, the developer submitted 9,054 pages of documents.
Thatβs longer than War and Peace, all 7 Harry Potter books, and the Bible combined.
The Shoreditch Works development would deliver:
β’ 40 new homes
β’ 4,150 new jobs
78% of people prefer the new design to the existing building.
Would you say a 9,054-page planning application for an office block and some flats is:
A) Too long
B) About right
C) Not long enough
If you answered C, congratulations! You could work at Hackney Council.
Are supermarkets, industrial estates, and railway sidings 'brownfield land'?
The answer is no.
At least that's what the Government's definition for a new tax on housebuilding says.
Our campaign director Sam Richards explains.
Read the piece on substack: open.substack.com/pub/samdumit...
19.12.2025 17:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It doesn't mean we need to give up on net zero, but these are difficult realities we have to think about. The one big clean tech exception is nuclear, where we have already broken away from China.
19.12.2025 17:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If we go further back in the supply chain who do we find there? China!
19.12.2025 17:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0UK Wind turbines are usually not made in China but China produces:
~80% of global wind gearboxes
~82% of power converters
~73% of generators
The UKβs Net Zero transition is very dependent on China. Over 80% of our solar panels come from China because China makes almost all the world's solar panels.
19.12.2025 17:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Labour spent ages arguing that the railways should be nationalised.
They appear not to have spent much time figuring out what we can learn from the best nationalised systems.
catchingmice.substack.com/cp/180687006
Britain can't reach Net Zero without Chinese supply chains.
What are the risks and what should we do about them?
This, from my colleague Michael Hill, is the best thing I've read on Britain's reliance on China to reach Net Zero.
www.samdumitriu.com/p/china-the-...
NEW: Labour just announced the biggest change in planning policy in 80 years.
My breakdown of the key measures and whether they will succeed.
www.samdumitriu.com/p/labour-are...
Seem to be struggling to message you on linkedin but my email is mhill@britainremade.co.uk
30.11.2025 12:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I work for Britain Remade and we are one of the YIMBY groups getting very worried about how the BSR is working. Would you be interested in a quick chat about your experience and how we could change things? See the link for something related: www.tiktok.com/@britain_rem...
30.11.2025 10:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0"Scotland faces a choice: embrace nuclear and share in the investment, jobs, and clean power, or stick with an outdated ban and watch opportunity flow elsewhere"
@michaeljahill.bsky.social writes for the blog on the opportunities for Scotland from nuclear power
www.enlighten.scot/time-to-ditc...