interesting, thanks for the explanation :)
18.02.2025 16:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0interesting, thanks for the explanation :)
18.02.2025 16:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0not sure if I got you right, but as far as I see, the field validation on instantiation still works - can't see a difference
18.02.2025 15:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0that's such a neat implementation! Actually I don't think you even need the eval: you can pass the field type as a string and let pydantic/ the types module handle it ...
18.02.2025 15:06 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0