AJL ⛄'s Avatar

AJL ⛄

@guiltypanacea.bsky.social

Sad dad slowcore dad Hugh Goggins in a prior life FOT he/him

1,255 Followers  |  2,423 Following  |  15,487 Posts  |  Joined: 05.07.2023
Posts Following

Posts by AJL ⛄ (@guiltypanacea.bsky.social)

Trying to Google Steve Toth, but my phone keeps changing it to Steve Goth

04.03.2026 04:16 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

we must imagine the he/hims happy

03.03.2026 21:44 — 👍 10    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

I'm glad Mr. Corgan made it to Ash Wednesday mass

04.03.2026 01:39 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
The dialogue at the opening of the Are We the Baddies Sketch?

"Yeah, er... Hans, I've just noticed something"

"The badges on our caps, have you looked at them?"

The dialogue at the opening of the Are We the Baddies Sketch? "Yeah, er... Hans, I've just noticed something" "The badges on our caps, have you looked at them?"

leaving this here so I can easily search it up and post it at people later.

04.03.2026 01:26 — 👍 62    🔁 5    💬 1    📌 0

I don't think this whole thing could possibly be more on the nose. And yet so many people are just screwing it up

04.03.2026 01:38 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Just unsubscribed from a podcast patreon whose name I won't mention and picked up an LC subscription in its place

04.03.2026 00:03 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Have canceled so many podcast patreon subscriptions this year. It's nice

03.03.2026 23:51 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Ah that explains it

03.03.2026 23:35 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Every big account eventually just becomes the same cliche spouting account

03.03.2026 23:34 — 👍 6    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Is this Graham Platner's social media network?

03.03.2026 23:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Are we back??

03.03.2026 22:45 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

I don't even know what special expertise Platner has that would make him comparable to a rocketry expert. The moral dilemma of recruiting the V2 rocket guy doesn't exist here

03.03.2026 20:17 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Look, January was a very different time. You had to be there

03.03.2026 20:16 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I think there's a huge gap between "perfect" and "went on and spoke approvingly about a holocaust denier's podcast a few months ago"

03.03.2026 20:10 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Like a lil rave for one

03.03.2026 18:32 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Assume Trump didn't even know until he saw it on Fox and demanded this

03.03.2026 18:18 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Haha, what??

03.03.2026 18:16 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Yeah, I thought they were genuinely confused. My bad

03.03.2026 05:48 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Oh, are you just pretending you don't understand what I'm saying? Ha. Ha.

03.03.2026 05:47 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

That's why I used quotation marks

03.03.2026 05:42 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

The label also predated the Trump admin

03.03.2026 05:42 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

"Alt right" predated the Trump presidency

03.03.2026 05:39 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Well this is disappointing. Used to really get a kick out of her work

03.03.2026 03:02 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

03.03.2026 03:01 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Sponsors of House Bill 141, “Fifth Amendment Protection Act,” have said the legislation is needed to protect private property rights by limiting local governments’ ability to charge mitigation fees that fund affordable housing programs. Teton County, the only local government in Wyoming that now charges such fees, has used those dollars to build more than 400 homes in the last 30 years.

Sponsors of House Bill 141, “Fifth Amendment Protection Act,” have said the legislation is needed to protect private property rights by limiting local governments’ ability to charge mitigation fees that fund affordable housing programs. Teton County, the only local government in Wyoming that now charges such fees, has used those dollars to build more than 400 homes in the last 30 years.

Huge NIMBY loss

03.03.2026 01:05 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Kgan dissent 
Substantive due process has not been of late in the good graces of this Court—and especially of the Members of today’s majority. The Due Process Clause, needless to say, does not expressly grant parental rights of any kind. The relevant text bars a State only from depriving a person of “liberty” “without due process of law.” Members of the majority often have expressed skepticism—sometimes outright hostility—to understanding the “capacious” term “liberty” to enshrine specific
rights. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization...(2022). Substantive due process, one has
stated, is a “particularly dangerous” “legal fiction” because
it “invites judges” to “roa[m] at large in the constitutional
field guided only by their personal views.” McDonald v.
Chicago...(2010) (THOMAS , J., concurring
in part and concurring in judgment); Obergefell v. Hodges,
...(2015) (THOMAS , J., dissenting). [see footnote 2] Another has pointed to the “judicial misuse of the so-called ‘substantive component’ of due process to dictate policy on
matters that belonged to the people to decide.” Sessions v.
Dimaya, ...(2018) (GORSUCH , J., concurring
in part and concurring in judgment). And yet a third, when
defending the Court’s elimination of a 50-year-old right
grounded in substantive due process, explained that the
“Constitution does not grant the nine unelected Members of
this Court the unilateral authority to rewrite the Constitution.” Dobbs, 597 U. S., at 340 (KAVANAUGH , J., concur-
ring). There are many such statements to choose from in
this Court’s recent substantive due process caselaw. Especially given the Court’s last venture into the field, today’s..
——————
Footnote 2 
For that reason, JUSTICE THOMAS has called for overruling “all” of this
Court’s “substantive due process precedents.” Dobbs...(concurring opinion). That invitation presumably extends to the
precedents supporting both the District Court’s decision and today’s per curiam.

Kgan dissent Substantive due process has not been of late in the good graces of this Court—and especially of the Members of today’s majority. The Due Process Clause, needless to say, does not expressly grant parental rights of any kind. The relevant text bars a State only from depriving a person of “liberty” “without due process of law.” Members of the majority often have expressed skepticism—sometimes outright hostility—to understanding the “capacious” term “liberty” to enshrine specific rights. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization...(2022). Substantive due process, one has stated, is a “particularly dangerous” “legal fiction” because it “invites judges” to “roa[m] at large in the constitutional field guided only by their personal views.” McDonald v. Chicago...(2010) (THOMAS , J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); Obergefell v. Hodges, ...(2015) (THOMAS , J., dissenting). [see footnote 2] Another has pointed to the “judicial misuse of the so-called ‘substantive component’ of due process to dictate policy on matters that belonged to the people to decide.” Sessions v. Dimaya, ...(2018) (GORSUCH , J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). And yet a third, when defending the Court’s elimination of a 50-year-old right grounded in substantive due process, explained that the “Constitution does not grant the nine unelected Members of this Court the unilateral authority to rewrite the Constitution.” Dobbs, 597 U. S., at 340 (KAVANAUGH , J., concur- ring). There are many such statements to choose from in this Court’s recent substantive due process caselaw. Especially given the Court’s last venture into the field, today’s.. —————— Footnote 2 For that reason, JUSTICE THOMAS has called for overruling “all” of this Court’s “substantive due process precedents.” Dobbs...(concurring opinion). That invitation presumably extends to the precedents supporting both the District Court’s decision and today’s per curiam.

Elena Kagan from the top rope: "The Due Process Clause, needless to say, does not expressly grant parental rights of any kind..."
Then she throws the words of Thomas and Kavanaugh from Dobbs, and Gorsuch from another case, back in their faces www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

03.03.2026 01:01 — 👍 266    🔁 73    💬 1    📌 2

That is, in fact, a moon

03.03.2026 01:02 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Wyoming Senate squashes housing bill at center of check controversy - WyoFile The upper chamber voted to effectively kill legislation, citing “a cloud of suspicion and mistrust.”

This is amazing

A right wing activist handed out checks from a billionaire to WY legislators on the House floor.

First they denied it. When photos came out, they tried to justify it

Now, the bill she supported is dead. How's that for effective activism?

wyofile.com/wyoming-sena...

03.03.2026 01:01 — 👍 6    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

Mom, can we have Billy Budd?
We have Billy Budd at home!

02.03.2026 21:08 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

You'd think three memoirs would give you a chance to do some of that, but apparently not

02.03.2026 21:05 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0