Trying to Google Steve Toth, but my phone keeps changing it to Steve Goth
04.03.2026 04:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Trying to Google Steve Toth, but my phone keeps changing it to Steve Goth
04.03.2026 04:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0we must imagine the he/hims happy
03.03.2026 21:44 — 👍 10 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0I'm glad Mr. Corgan made it to Ash Wednesday mass
04.03.2026 01:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The dialogue at the opening of the Are We the Baddies Sketch? "Yeah, er... Hans, I've just noticed something" "The badges on our caps, have you looked at them?"
leaving this here so I can easily search it up and post it at people later.
04.03.2026 01:26 — 👍 62 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0I don't think this whole thing could possibly be more on the nose. And yet so many people are just screwing it up
04.03.2026 01:38 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Just unsubscribed from a podcast patreon whose name I won't mention and picked up an LC subscription in its place
04.03.2026 00:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Have canceled so many podcast patreon subscriptions this year. It's nice
03.03.2026 23:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ah that explains it
03.03.2026 23:35 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Every big account eventually just becomes the same cliche spouting account
03.03.2026 23:34 — 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Is this Graham Platner's social media network?
03.03.2026 23:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Are we back??
03.03.2026 22:45 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0I don't even know what special expertise Platner has that would make him comparable to a rocketry expert. The moral dilemma of recruiting the V2 rocket guy doesn't exist here
03.03.2026 20:17 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Look, January was a very different time. You had to be there
03.03.2026 20:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think there's a huge gap between "perfect" and "went on and spoke approvingly about a holocaust denier's podcast a few months ago"
03.03.2026 20:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Like a lil rave for one
03.03.2026 18:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Assume Trump didn't even know until he saw it on Fox and demanded this
03.03.2026 18:18 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Haha, what??
03.03.2026 18:16 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yeah, I thought they were genuinely confused. My bad
03.03.2026 05:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Oh, are you just pretending you don't understand what I'm saying? Ha. Ha.
03.03.2026 05:47 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That's why I used quotation marks
03.03.2026 05:42 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0The label also predated the Trump admin
03.03.2026 05:42 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0"Alt right" predated the Trump presidency
03.03.2026 05:39 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Well this is disappointing. Used to really get a kick out of her work
03.03.2026 03:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
03.03.2026 03:01 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Sponsors of House Bill 141, “Fifth Amendment Protection Act,” have said the legislation is needed to protect private property rights by limiting local governments’ ability to charge mitigation fees that fund affordable housing programs. Teton County, the only local government in Wyoming that now charges such fees, has used those dollars to build more than 400 homes in the last 30 years.
Huge NIMBY loss
03.03.2026 01:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kgan dissent Substantive due process has not been of late in the good graces of this Court—and especially of the Members of today’s majority. The Due Process Clause, needless to say, does not expressly grant parental rights of any kind. The relevant text bars a State only from depriving a person of “liberty” “without due process of law.” Members of the majority often have expressed skepticism—sometimes outright hostility—to understanding the “capacious” term “liberty” to enshrine specific rights. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization...(2022). Substantive due process, one has stated, is a “particularly dangerous” “legal fiction” because it “invites judges” to “roa[m] at large in the constitutional field guided only by their personal views.” McDonald v. Chicago...(2010) (THOMAS , J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); Obergefell v. Hodges, ...(2015) (THOMAS , J., dissenting). [see footnote 2] Another has pointed to the “judicial misuse of the so-called ‘substantive component’ of due process to dictate policy on matters that belonged to the people to decide.” Sessions v. Dimaya, ...(2018) (GORSUCH , J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). And yet a third, when defending the Court’s elimination of a 50-year-old right grounded in substantive due process, explained that the “Constitution does not grant the nine unelected Members of this Court the unilateral authority to rewrite the Constitution.” Dobbs, 597 U. S., at 340 (KAVANAUGH , J., concur- ring). There are many such statements to choose from in this Court’s recent substantive due process caselaw. Especially given the Court’s last venture into the field, today’s.. —————— Footnote 2 For that reason, JUSTICE THOMAS has called for overruling “all” of this Court’s “substantive due process precedents.” Dobbs...(concurring opinion). That invitation presumably extends to the precedents supporting both the District Court’s decision and today’s per curiam.
Elena Kagan from the top rope: "The Due Process Clause, needless to say, does not expressly grant parental rights of any kind..."
Then she throws the words of Thomas and Kavanaugh from Dobbs, and Gorsuch from another case, back in their faces www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
That is, in fact, a moon
03.03.2026 01:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
This is amazing
A right wing activist handed out checks from a billionaire to WY legislators on the House floor.
First they denied it. When photos came out, they tried to justify it
Now, the bill she supported is dead. How's that for effective activism?
wyofile.com/wyoming-sena...
Mom, can we have Billy Budd?
We have Billy Budd at home!
You'd think three memoirs would give you a chance to do some of that, but apparently not
02.03.2026 21:05 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0