Samma uppe i norr. Det här är värre än 2018.
27.07.2025 23:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@ree81.bsky.social
I believe we have the wrong DNA profile to run a civilization. Pic is from Paradise, the town that burned down.
Samma uppe i norr. Det här är värre än 2018.
27.07.2025 23:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Don't feed the trolls. He's a well known spreader of climate denial. A monster, if you ask me.
23.06.2025 12:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Of course your timeline is riddled with AI art lol. Loser.
23.06.2025 12:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You. You're a goddamn monster. You have no problem taking oil money to peddly conspiracies and disinformation.
Stop talking to real scientists you hack.
In fact, log off the internet completely. Never return.
Ah, plain cowardice then.
23.06.2025 12:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Well, at least the human emissions are going to virtually flat-line around 2045-2050 or so.
27.05.2025 13:45 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0No, you do witch comics only now.
Stop trying to be a good person and have ... *ugh* ..."diversity in your portfolio". Just give people what they want. Buff anthro women.
;)
Lol
Lmao
Nyoooohhh~ you're being too dramatic!!11 1.5C won't *end the world* and you're bad for spreading that opinion! DOOMERS BAD!
(Nobody's really doing that, and if they spread anything it's that "we're hitting 1.5C way too fast, meaning we'll shoot right into apocalyptic territory")
Tyvärr verkar han ha gett upp hoppet en hel del. Han låter frustrerad i hans senaste.... tror det var ett "Ted talk" (kan ha fel), som dök upp på youtube för några månader sen.
Frekvensen av gångerna han dyker upp i media, och även på sociala medier, verkar ha gått ner. Det är för att läget är....
Skrev inte "kritik". Skrev desinformation.
Men men, du verkar vara ytterst stel i ditt tänkande. Hoppas jag aldrig blir så när jag blir gammal.
The short answer is: Human beings lack foresight. Yes we "can" do it, but most of us simply don't. If you weren't *FORCED* to save up for pension, 98% of us wouldn't, period.
A study showed that our "emotional attachment" to our future self is about as high as a random stranger dying of thirst tody
Hot conspiracy take: He's trying to crash the global economy by accelerationism, thus minimizing damage by capitalism before it's literally too late.
12.05.2025 11:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's by design (pic). Turns out, if you give rich people power, it's game over.
Oops, media is all owned by rich people, rather than a (for example) government funded but separate news organization that has a clear goal of prioritizing what's important for society, as well as holding up truth etc.
It's by design (pic). Turns out, if you give rich people power, it's game over.
Oops, media is all owned by rich people, rather than a (for example) government funded but separate news organization that has a clear goal of prioritizing what's important for society, as well as holding up truth etc.
Du svarade inte på frågan.
Varför ska det ena vara olagligt men inte det andra? Båda är samhällsskadliga som tusan.
Climate deniers are part of a greater group of what I call "Xpunks" who are social media influencers posting on emotional-trigger issues, such as climate change, that easily rile up sectors of society (especially the right) by carefully planted disinformation and hate speech.
30.09.2024 12:13 — 👍 5 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0"Ah base my entire personality on the slogan 'Ya can't take muh car!'"
12.05.2025 11:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I had no idea what "Ofcom" was because I'm not from the UK, but apparently they're some sort of regulation, yes.
But, in a neoliberal society where the rich have *ALL* the power, obviously someone who gets their paycheck from these assholes are going to be kept on a tight leash.
Så vad är skillnaden, tror du, mellan de som sprider samhällsskadlig nazistpropaganda och de som sprider samhällsfarlig klimatförnekarpropaganda/högerextrem propaganda designat att skapa osämja och polarisering i samhället?
12.05.2025 11:20 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Oh wow, almost as if you need some sort of REGULATION ON MEDIA in order to not spread untruths. Hmmm. @lasse2.bsky.social
12.05.2025 10:51 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 02) "Hur avgör man vem som talar sanning"? är också ett väldigt lösryckt "argument".
Det kommer gå utmärkt att med 99.9% säkerhet avgöra vilka som talar sanning om faktan om klimatet åtminstone, då det är ett väldigt faktaspäckat ämne.
I så fall är det censur att lagföra de som sprider nazism/HMF.
Högern (världens höger) nu utnyttjar yttrandefriheten för att sprida enorma mängder desinformation som gynnar dem, eftersom de inte har skrupler.
Vill du ha förändring?
Förespråka den omedelbara inskränkningen av yttrandefriheten på internet för folk som sprider osanningar.
Vill du inte ha det så vill du inte förbättra världen på ett realistiskt sätt.
Vill du ha förändring?
Förespråka den omedelbara inskränkningen av yttrandefriheten på internet för folk som sprider osanningar.
Vill du inte ha det så vill du inte förbättra världen på ett realistiskt sätt.
Meanwhile, IPCC head goes out of his way to proclaim "STOP BEING SUCH A DOOMER GUYSSSSS!!"
www.dw.com/en/climate-c...
We live in a clown world.
I just wish there was a way of accurately measuring the amount of Albedo we're adding through human activity.
Does it really have to come down to "Okay people, let's shut down all of industry for 2 weeks so we can tell"?
404 on NASA.com in 3...... 2......
10.05.2025 18:17 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Reported. Byeeeeeee.
09.05.2025 20:23 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0-33
09.05.2025 20:21 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0