Ola Løkken Nordrum

No mention of health, climate action, or sustainability.

Yet another missed opportunity to create a healthier, fairer city for all.
#ReimagineDublin

The UN-Habitat Five Principles of Sustainable Neighbourhood Planning.

Not to be negative, but bar a few exceptions, Dublin is failing on all five — and spectacularly so.

We desperately need to up our ambitions and #ReimagineDublin.

Yea...

I'm more concerned about that enormous number of learner drivers. Not a sign of functioning system.

That is an absolutely terrifying statistic.

US airlines fear EU-wide impact of likely ruling on Dublin Airport passenger cap The Government must enact legislation to remove the passenger cap at Dublin Airport by the end of April or risk seeing a decision by the EU’s top court that would give planning authorities across the ...

Does this article mention:

Emissions? No.
Climate change? No.
Human health? No.

More free pro-aviation PR from the Irish media.

That's what I call a headline!

The health case for a fossil fuel advertising ban Key points An estimated 8.7 million premature deaths occur globally each year from air pollution attributable to fossil fuel combustion alone.[1][1] Climate change, which is primarily caused by the bu...

The health care for a fossil fuel advertising ban is obvious.

The question is: will our government act?
#BanFossilAds

Dublin City Council plans another sub-standard width cycle path on primary route — Design includes shared pedestrian/cycling crossings at Phoenix Park access points.– No protection provided at left turn onto South Circular Road at Island Bridge. Dublin City Council&…

Another day, another sub-standard cycle path from Dublin City Council.

The irony is not lost on me.

Time to ban fossil fuel advertising maybe? Free ourselves from their shackles?

I didn't expect for this to take off like this...

The College Green plans are not perfect, far from it, but they are a step in the right direction!

So please, put in a submission in support of the plans!

But remember, do include everything you want to see improved!

Let's create a healthier, greener, and fairer Dublin. Together!

Climate Changemakers: Three key ingredients to boost nature restoration in Ireland Nature in Ireland needs targeted support to speed up its recovery from decades of degradation, says Fintan Kelly, senior land use officer with the Irish Environmental Network (IEN).

Great piece by Fintan Kelly!

We know what we need to do! Now, let's get the obstacles out of the way and get to it!

‘A brutalist design’: Planned flood defences for south Dublin rail line divide opinion Some residents in Blackrock and neighbouring areas are not convinced by a proposed solution from Irish Rail to defend against future floods

Relying on a coastal rail line as climate change gets worse is madness.

Move it inland. Put it in a tunnel. Build it properly for the future.
#ReimagineDublin

I'll leave it at that.

Have a good Sunday!

This isn’t about personal opinion. It’s about listening to the science.

Plenty of people have pointed out the issues with the statistics you used.

Repeating a flawed figure doesn’t make it evidence, and If you’re making a public safety argument, the burden is on you to show robust evidence.

No @antonsavage.bsky.social!

A misleading RSA statistic claiming “98% of pedestrians killed weren’t wearing hi-vis” does not show that pedestrians are safer wearing hi-vis.

Making that claim is A) wrong because it’s based on flawed statistics, and B) I’ll keep saying it — correlation ≠ causation.

Failure assumes they're trying though...

Emissions fall but due to falling herd numbers as nitrogen usage rises Any reduction in emissions from the agricultural sector last year will be mainly due to reduced cattle numbers as nitrogen usage continues to increase.

Latest figures show a total failure of policy to deal with agriculture emissions

www.independent.ie/farming/fore...

Anton Savage's comment that “98% of pedestrians killed weren’t wearing hi-vis” shows a lack of understanding of statistics.

If few people wear hi-vis while walking, then of course almost everyone killed won’t have been wearing it. Without comparing actual risk rates, that figure tells us nothing.

One of the most disturbing interviews I’ve heard in a while — an interviewer veering into blaming pedestrians killed on our roads for not wearing hi-vis, and a bus drivers’ union pushing the same line.

This thread is worth reading to see the spectacularly, wilfully, boorish reaction from a pundit presented with reasons and data why his hot take is wrong.

The “comment is sacred, facts are free” school of punditry really has debased public discourse.

Ad hominem.

I think my original post explains it clearly.

Correlation ≠ causation.

Using stats like that only feeds a victim-blaming narrative.

David McWilliams: Ireland’s low urban population has left us with a problem of extreme commuting As Clare and Tipperary people know, Ireland has become a country of sprawl, of suburbs creeping into countryside and towns and villages choked with traffic

I agree with the content of this article, but I disagree with the language:

'Ireland’s low urban population has left us with a problem of extreme commuting.'

The use of 'has', makes it seem like this is an accident or unfortunate consequence when it is in fact willed policy that has led us here.

🙄

Didn't think we had a right to roam at all?

Minister wants State to purchase land amounting to size of Killarney National Park every year In an interview with The Journal, the Minister of State for Nature talks about how he plans to significantly grow Ireland’s nature reserves and pay farmers to be more sustainable.

I'm desperately in favour of more space for nature in Ireland, but given the state of Ireland's existing national parks, creating more will do little, if any, to fix the problem.

Beef and lamb get 580 times more in EU subsidies than legumes, study finds Report says common agricultural policy provides ‘unfair’ levels of support to unhealthy, meat-heavy diets

Who would've thought...

And, as I've said many times before, how in fucks name is it only careless driving when someone is dead because of that driving.

How more dangerous can you get than killing someone!!!

Why is it not dangerous driving?

The judiciary need to change their ways.