@celticdragon1.bsky.social
Transgender Army Air Cav veteran, parent and spouse. History and geology degrees. Warhammer 40K, Revolutionary War, Celtic harp, medieval weapons. Oh, and ballet.
If human rights are limited to certain groups, they are not really human rights, are they?
05.03.2026 15:05 โ ๐ 303 ๐ 61 ๐ฌ 18 ๐ 1Perfidy is a different critter. Basically attacking under the guise of a non combatant
05.03.2026 15:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
This may be a complicating factor. She was unarmed and we knew she was unarmed.
Would she be considered hors de combat?
www.middleeasteye.net/news/iranian...
Next time someone asks you to sum up MAGA in 30 seconds or less, show them this clip of Andrew Tate explaining why he doesn't read books.
07.02.2026 17:44 โ ๐ 437 ๐ 124 ๐ฌ 68 ๐ 63Btw it appears she was indeed unarmed
05.03.2026 14:47 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I'm not sure why you're making excuses for this.
05.03.2026 14:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
The Belgrano was an armed capital ship and still in the theater of operations.
This frigate was 2K miles away and apparently unarmed according to the naval review requirements
If she'd been armed it appears it would have been "lawful but awful"
Knowingly sinking a defenseless ship with no combat capacity? That's an open question.
India isn't a warzone. I have no idea where the ship was headed (if anywhere), although I strongly doubt her captain had any intention of entering the operations envelope of a US carrier battle group WITH NO WEAPONS
05.03.2026 14:39 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Yeah, it would seem
05.03.2026 14:36 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0At least that many
05.03.2026 14:35 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The Belgrano was an armed capital ship who was still in the theater of operations. An unarmed ship 2K miles from the Persian Gulf isn't even really comparable.
05.03.2026 14:34 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
@hurricanexyz.bsky.social
@kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Yeah, it looks like we *knowingly* sank a defenseless ship if this report is accurate.
Oh she definitely should have stayed in port and we should have told her to return to port
05.03.2026 14:27 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Except, meh
05.03.2026 14:19 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
Yeah I had questions. Law guy answered
bsky.app/profile/pwna...
I have zero love for the Iranian Navy, so let's just get that out of the way. The ship was basically hors de combat with no offensive or defensive capabilities. There was no need to do *anything* at that point beyond messaging the ship to return to India. What the hell are we doing here?
05.03.2026 14:16 โ ๐ 32 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0
So apparently the Iranian frigate was unarmed per requirements of the Milan 2026 naval exercises, and we knew the ship was unarmed and defenseless.
I really cannot understand the decision to fire on her accept as performative sadism.
www.middleeasteye.net/news/iranian...
Ok thanks. That does make it even more indefensible
05.03.2026 14:03 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0people didn't openly acknowledge musk was basically a nazi until like two months ago. he posted "you are saying the actual truth" to a nazi saying jews were behind the great replacement in 2022
05.03.2026 13:08 โ ๐ 343 ๐ 47 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0Is there a source on that? I haven't seen it.
05.03.2026 13:48 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Basically at war it's considered a VERY serious risk for a submarine to surface for an extended period while at war, and subs have no means to shelter POWs or take them on board
05.03.2026 13:18 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 146 U.S. Code ยง 2304 notes exceptions for "a vessel of war or a vessel owned by the United States Government appropriated only to a public service" in some contexts. However, generally, providing aid is still a requirement unless it poses a significant risk.
05.03.2026 13:18 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Kelly: "You could pick a random group of people off the street tonight here in DC and they could probably do a better job than our government is doing right now. They don't have a goal, there's no strategic plan. And what this is likely to lead to is, again, a long war with a lot of dead Americans."
05.03.2026 02:26 โ ๐ 16309 ๐ 4563 ๐ฌ 519 ๐ 220Yeah my look-around of legal opinions seems to be that the sinking was 'legal' in the context of an established existing state of war, but that of course the entire war is not legal at all
05.03.2026 12:43 โ ๐ 10 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Was she unarmed? That I haven't heard. The exercise wasn't live fire but it's highly unusual for a warship to not carry her basic load out.
05.03.2026 12:15 โ ๐ 13 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Submarines aren't expected to surface and render aid. Modern attack subs have almost no ability to even do so.
05.03.2026 12:13 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Oh I like that!
05.03.2026 12:09 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Orks are kinda head on also, though maybe not as much as Eldar. My wife has an Eldar fleet that's extremely vexing
05.03.2026 12:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0