's Avatar

@lisa-bee.bsky.social

Legal aid litigator, musician, compassionate soul, agent for change.

50 Followers  |  69 Following  |  2 Posts  |  Joined: 17.11.2024  |  1.8658

Latest posts by lisa-bee.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

Album release anniversary today…

Released June 25. 1984

Prince - Purple Rain

#albumanniversary #vinylsky #nowspinning #nowplaying
#vinylcommunity #vinyl #records #music

25.06.2025 09:53 — 👍 7460    🔁 934    💬 273    📌 120

I thought exactly the same thing. I keep giving NYT more chances, and it keeps disappointing me.

15.06.2025 20:30 — 👍 0    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0


John Q. Barrett
‪@johnqbarrett.bsky.social‬

Follow
Respectfully, are you a lawyer? You’re over-reading the elements of the statutes, plus making jury/not guilty arguments. Only probable cause, not guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, is required to charge. The FBI affidavit has that regarding the statutory elements.
April 25, 2025 at 4:02 PM
1 repost
16 quotes
1 like

45

17

1




Write your reply

‪Courtney Milan‬
 ‪@courtneymilan.com‬
· 5h
Respectfully, which element of the statute am I over-reading? Can you explain to me where the judge issued a threat? Or a letter? Or corruptly engaged in a practice? Is your argument that those are not elements of the offense?

2

5

231


‪Courtney Milan‬
 ‪@courtneymilan.com‬
· 5h
Because no, there is not probably cause of the person has not engaged in one of the listed elements of the offense.

1


168


‪Courtney Milan‬
 ‪@courtneymilan.com‬
· 5h
And I clerked for Sandra Day O’Connor.

John Q. Barrett ‪@johnqbarrett.bsky.social‬ Follow Respectfully, are you a lawyer? You’re over-reading the elements of the statutes, plus making jury/not guilty arguments. Only probable cause, not guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, is required to charge. The FBI affidavit has that regarding the statutory elements. April 25, 2025 at 4:02 PM 1 repost 16 quotes 1 like 45 17 1 Write your reply ‪Courtney Milan‬ ‪@courtneymilan.com‬ · 5h Respectfully, which element of the statute am I over-reading? Can you explain to me where the judge issued a threat? Or a letter? Or corruptly engaged in a practice? Is your argument that those are not elements of the offense? 2 5 231 ‪Courtney Milan‬ ‪@courtneymilan.com‬ · 5h Because no, there is not probably cause of the person has not engaged in one of the listed elements of the offense. 1 168 ‪Courtney Milan‬ ‪@courtneymilan.com‬ · 5h And I clerked for Sandra Day O’Connor.

Well that's the mother of all mike drops.

Special bonus: for the first time I recall seeing, men are going after a guy for mansplaining.

26.04.2025 04:27 — 👍 1312    🔁 148    💬 25    📌 17

I have tariffed
the penguins
that are on
Heard Island

and which
you were probably
assuming
did not export goods

forgive me
they were taking advantage of us
so cunning
and so cold

03.04.2025 19:45 — 👍 28893    🔁 7064    💬 557    📌 339
You will not bring the people in here to be cross-examined. You’re afraid to do so because you know cross-examination would reveal the truth. This is the U.S. District Court. Whenever you submit declarations, those people should be submitted to the cross-examination, just like the plaintiffs’ side should be. Then we get at the truth of what’s actually true. I tend to doubt that you’re telling me the truth whenever we hear all the evidence eventually. Why can’t you bring your people in to be cross-examined or deposed at their convenience? I said two hours for Mr. Ezell. A deposition at his convenience. And you withdrew his declaration rather than do that? Come on. That’s a sham. It upsets me, I want you to know that. I’ve been practicing in this court for over 50 years and I know how we get at the truth. And you’re not helping me get at the truth. You’re giving me press releases, sham documents. I’m getting mad.

You will not bring the people in here to be cross-examined. You’re afraid to do so because you know cross-examination would reveal the truth. This is the U.S. District Court. Whenever you submit declarations, those people should be submitted to the cross-examination, just like the plaintiffs’ side should be. Then we get at the truth of what’s actually true. I tend to doubt that you’re telling me the truth whenever we hear all the evidence eventually. Why can’t you bring your people in to be cross-examined or deposed at their convenience? I said two hours for Mr. Ezell. A deposition at his convenience. And you withdrew his declaration rather than do that? Come on. That’s a sham. It upsets me, I want you to know that. I’ve been practicing in this court for over 50 years and I know how we get at the truth. And you’re not helping me get at the truth. You’re giving me press releases, sham documents. I’m getting mad.

Judge Alsup just said this👇 to the Justice Department about their refusal to let Charles Ezell testify about his (highly dubious) declaration that OPM did not illegally direct mass firings.

13.03.2025 15:27 — 👍 2949    🔁 646    💬 65    📌 121
Video thumbnail

"If a woman doesn't look woman enough to a Republican, they want to be able to inspect your genitals to use a bathroom? It's disgusting.

Everyone should reject it completely... they're endangering women, they're endangering girls of all kind, and everyone should reject it. It's gross." - AOC

21.11.2024 02:44 — 👍 61208    🔁 13219    💬 947    📌 1130

Good job with the algorithm. I feel like these are my people.

17.11.2024 05:19 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@lisa-bee is following 20 prominent accounts