If there ever was a “major question” requiring more specific delegation … and yet …
04.08.2025 02:03 — 👍 104 🔁 25 💬 5 📌 0@kwcollins.bsky.social
Co-founder, Survey 160. Loves survey and voter participation. Researcher. Democrat. YIMBY. Husband and Dad. Opinion haver and measurer. Outdoors and cooking enthusiast. He/Him
If there ever was a “major question” requiring more specific delegation … and yet …
04.08.2025 02:03 — 👍 104 🔁 25 💬 5 📌 0NEW. U Mass Poll.
Trump approve/disapprove: 38%/58% (cf. April, 44/53).
How much have you read, seen, or heard about Jeffrey Epstein?
A lot 36%
Some 41%
Not much 19%
Nothing 4%.
Trump administration hiding important information on Epstein? Agree 63%. Disagree 15%.
www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zgf7d...
Plus a white nectarine galette
04.08.2025 00:24 — 👍 14 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My wife was out of town with the kids this weekend weekend for a “ladies and babies” trip with college friends, so I cooked one of her favorites, scallops, on her return.
Brown butter scallops, sweet corn, brown butter chanterelles, a sweet corn saffron buerre blanc, and pickled chiles
You know this is a parody in the Onion, right?
03.08.2025 19:29 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Emphasis on *some*
03.08.2025 19:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I genuinely wish we weren't already having the "can the private sector recreate BLS data" conversation but it is kind of cosmic to see employment data being revised to match what surveys of feelings about the economy have been telling us all year, rather than vice versa
03.08.2025 19:12 — 👍 18 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0Congrats, and thank you for your service.
03.08.2025 19:18 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Wait, you're a county chair now?
03.08.2025 19:16 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Already having minor FOMO over skipping #JSM2025. Survey Research Methods folks there, please post!
03.08.2025 19:15 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0If you work in/adjacent to Democratic politics, or even if you are an occasional Democratic donor, this new @adambonica.bsky.social piece is the most important thing you can read today.
The Democratic Party cannot build power if it allows scam pacs to thrive
open.substack.com/pub/data4dem...
*”should already be subscribed”
Sigh, this is what I mean
(reposted to fix typo)
Also, unless you are only following this account for the survey methods posts, you should be already be subscribed to Adam’s Substack, since he is covering a lot of the same territory, but with actual original analysis and greater rigor than my dashed-off, typo-laden posts 
If you work in/adjacent to Democratic politics, or even if you are an occasional Democratic donor, this new @adambonica.bsky.social piece is the most important thing you can read today.
The Democratic Party cannot build power if it allows scam pacs to thrive
open.substack.com/pub/data4dem...
Goldman: “The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) will publish a preliminary estimate of the benchmark revision to March 2025 nonfarm payrolls on September 9th. We estimate a downward revision on the order of 550-950k”
03.08.2025 00:09 — 👍 823 🔁 192 💬 20 📌 82bsky.app/profile/bgru...
03.08.2025 12:05 — 👍 21 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0August 1, 2025 AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION Committee on Economic Statistics and Committee on Government Relations Statement from the American Economic Association on the Dismissal of the BLS Commissioner Leaders of the American Economic Association express their grave concern over the dismissal of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) earlier today. The independence of the federal statistical agencies is essential to the proper functioning of a modern economy. Accurate, timely, and impartial statistics are the foundation upon which households, businesses, and policymakers make critical decisions. Undermining the independence or credibility of these agencies threatens the integrity of the information that markets, institutions, and the public rely on every day. Measuring the vast and dynamic U.S. economy in real time is inherently challenging. It is standard practice for statistical estimates to be revised as more complete and higher-quality data become available. These revisions reflect the commitment of statistical agencies to accuracy, transparency, and methodological rigor-not failure or bias. The BLS has long had a well-deserved reputation for professional excellence and nonpartisan integrity. Safeguarding this tradition is vital for the continued health of the U.S. economy and public trust in our institutions. We call upon elected officials to respect and preserve the independence of the nation's statistical infrastructure. Lawrence Katz President, American Economic Association Katharine Abraham President-Elect, American Economic Association Karen Dynan Chair, American Economic Association Committee on Economic Statistics Kenneth Troske Chair, American Economic Association Committee on Government Relations
Statement from the largest economics association about the BLS firing
As context: AEA approximately never makes such public statements
This is a big deal
Thread of research relying on world-renowned data produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
Please contribute
So much of my own research has used BLS data
Growing income inequality in who gets a college education - from NLSY79/97
www.nber.org/system/files...
the voting rights act is, in its entirety, obviously constitutional under the 15th amendment, which gives congress broad and proactive authority to stop racial discrimination in voting. and you know it is obviously constitutional because roberts has had to invent entire new doctrines to gut it.
02.08.2025 18:07 — 👍 10036 🔁 2736 💬 145 📌 78AAPOR Statement on the Removal of BLS Commissioner McEntarfer aapor.org/statements/a...
02.08.2025 17:16 — 👍 57 🔁 35 💬 3 📌 0“Dead on the inside” could be portrayed more sub textually, writers
02.08.2025 02:26 — 👍 13 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Good writing should be more subtle than this.
02.08.2025 02:24 — 👍 80 🔁 15 💬 14 📌 1Definitely an area ripe for political and policy entrepreneurs; majorities of both parties think the fed gov is doing a bad job
02.08.2025 02:22 — 👍 12 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 0Are there party crosstabs here besides the good/bad jobs question ?
02.08.2025 02:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What a night to skip a Brewers game
02.08.2025 01:33 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I know.
01.08.2025 23:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0We are going to need to re-amend the constitution along the lines of “You see those 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments? We really meant it the first time”
01.08.2025 22:59 — 👍 21 🔁 3 💬 3 📌 0Me three months ago:
01.08.2025 22:53 — 👍 16673 🔁 3819 💬 453 📌 114Cool looking job for Director of Polling at the AI Policy Institute, which does not appear to be an industry front group
www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/42...
President Trump called into question the integrity of the Employment Situation report that the BLS released this morning. He accused BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer of deliberately reporting false numbers to reflect poorly on this administration. This baseless, damaging claim undermines the valuable work and dedication of BLS staff who produce the reports each month. This escalates the President’s unprecedented attacks on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system. The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news. The Commissioner does not determine what the numbers are but simply reports on what the data show. The process of obtaining the numbers is decentralized by design to avoid opportunities for interference. The BLS uses the same proven, transparent, reliable process to produce estimates every month. Every month, BLS revises the prior two months’ employment estimates to reflect slower-arriving, more-accurate information. This rationale for firing Dr. McEntarfer is without merit and undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families, and policymakers. U.S. official statistics are the gold standard globally. When leaders of other nations have politicized economic data, it has destroyed public trust in all official statistics and in government science. We call on Congress to respond immediately, to investigate the factors that led to Commissioner McEntarfer’s removal, to strongly urge the Commissioner’s continued service, and ensure that the nonpartisan integrity of the position is retained. The statement from the President undermines these tenets and politicizes data which cannot and should not be used for political points.
"...escalates the President’s unprecedented attacks on the independence & integrity of the federal statistical system.
"The president seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news.
"...firing Dr. McEntarfer is without merit & undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics..."