Andrés E. Caicedo's Avatar

Andrés E. Caicedo

@andrescaicedo01.bsky.social

Father of two. Set theorist. Editor at Math Reviews.

754 Followers  |  706 Following  |  202 Posts  |  Joined: 22.06.2023  |  1.9912

Latest posts by andrescaicedo01.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
Martin Davis: An Overview of his Work in Logic, Computer Science, and Philosophy Abstract. In his autobiographical essay written in 1999, ‘From logic to computer science and back’, Martin David Davis (1928 3 8–2023 1 1) indicated that h

A paper on Martin Davis's work has just been published in "Philosophia Mathematica":
Martin Davis: An Overview of his Work in Logic, Computer Science, and Philosophy
By L De Mol, Y V Matiyasevich, E G Omodeo, A Policriti, W Sieg and E J Weyuker.
doi.org/10.1093/phil...

29.10.2025 16:03 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 1

Ha! Do you know anything about what is going on with them?

29.10.2025 15:44 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
MathsWorld – London’s new Museum of Mathematics MathsWorld is an interactive museum in London with innovative hands-on exhibits that explore the beauty, wonder, and everyday relevance of mathematics for visitors of all ages.

Excitingly, Today's the opening day of MathsWorld, the new hands-on maths museum in London. I've really enjoyed visiting MathsCity in Leeds, but they've now got a London location too! Details at mathsworld.com

18.10.2025 10:01 — 👍 42    🔁 16    💬 0    📌 0

"New Far Side comics" was definitely not on my bingo card for this week. They're not bad!

www.thefarside.com/new-stuff/

16.10.2025 18:58 — 👍 2308    🔁 864    💬 46    📌 154
Preview
Composition No 1 by Marc Saporta - review Jonathan Coe welcomes a beautiful edition of a 1962 experimental novel

www.theguardian.com/books/2011/o...

16.10.2025 00:08 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Springer!

07.10.2025 20:22 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image 07.10.2025 13:55 — 👍 4348    🔁 1419    💬 31    📌 35

Found it! Many thanks.

02.10.2025 02:28 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

If anyone here has access to the "Journal of the Early Book Society", I would be most grateful if you could send me "The Scribal Transmission of Northern Dialect in the Reeve’s Tale" by
Thomas J. Farrell, pp. 75-110 in Vol 25 (2022).
I do not currently have access to interlibrary loan. (Thanks!)

02.10.2025 01:54 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Anybody here with access to the Times Literary Supplement? There is an article from last year I would like to read.

26.09.2025 15:16 — 👍 0    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

If anybody with access to "American Literary Manuscripts : An Essay Review" by John C Broderick (Resources for American Literary Study (1976) 6 (1): 85–95) could share the review with me, I would be most grateful.

20.09.2025 01:13 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Mohammad Golshani (on FB): <17h ago>
I am very sad to say that Ronald Jensen, a leading set theorist and one of my favourite mathematicians, passed away yesterday.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Jensen

(The post includes a picture of Ronald smiling.)

Mohammad Golshani (on FB): <17h ago> I am very sad to say that Ronald Jensen, a leading set theorist and one of my favourite mathematicians, passed away yesterday. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Jensen (The post includes a picture of Ronald smiling.)

17.09.2025 23:26 — 👍 9    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Hoping someone can help me here: what would be a library or online resource (or other options) where I could find some of the publications of the (long defunct) Center for Editions of American Authors? Particularly their Newsletter, their reply to E. Wilson, their Statement of editorial principles.

14.09.2025 02:37 — 👍 3    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 0

The distinction between the strict and non-strict version is useful, sure. For instance in analysis, any continuous monotone function is differentiable a.e. But its derivative is never zero if strictly increasing, while the Cantor function, which is non-strictly increasing, has zero derivative a.e.

11.09.2025 19:14 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

This was fun! I wouldn't have made a big deal (or a deal at all) about the "too" in the sentence, so I guess it also taught something about English. Again, thank you.

08.09.2025 04:09 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
02.09.2025 21:37 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I have an amazing opportunity Sept. 15-19. I'll be at the Santa Fe Institute with a dozen invited humanists and scientists discussing this topic: "How do we reconcile traditional humanistic inquiry with mathematical modeling approaches that are reshaping knowledge production?" 1/5

02.09.2025 21:05 — 👍 22    🔁 5    💬 1    📌 0

Nice shirt, too.

02.09.2025 15:39 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Thanks. It's been too long since I've read Lakatos. Will revisit.

02.09.2025 04:13 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Cool. Thank you!

01.09.2025 21:13 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

😀 Ah, excellent! Again, many thanks.

01.09.2025 19:18 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Now I'm curious. Do you know other examples of papers where, similarly, the authors disagree on some point, and argue their opposite positions separately?
/End

01.09.2025 19:17 — 👍 5    🔁 2    💬 2    📌 0

The authors begin by saying that they disagree on the answer. Smith argues for 5 pages that it is No, and then Walker argues for the other 5 that it is Yes.
(Cont.)

01.09.2025 19:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
Did the Infantes de Carrión intend to kill the Cid's daughters? Published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies (Vol. 56, No. 1, 1979)

"Did the Infantes de Carrión intend to kill the Cid's daughters?"
Colin Smith & Roger M. Walker
Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 56:1, 1-10,
doi.org/10.1080/1475...
(Cont.)

01.09.2025 19:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

A natural question is whether they actually meant to kill them or not. I found a paper on this topic that discusses it following what seems to me to be an unusual approach:
(Cont.)

01.09.2025 19:15 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Reposted from Mathstodon, because I am still interested:

In "Cantar de Mio Cid", the infantes de Carrión, married to the Cid's daughters, decide to repudiate them, take them to an isolated area, beat them within an inch of their lives, and abandon them.
(Cont.)

01.09.2025 19:14 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Sir Thomas Malory, Le Morte Darthur, ed. P. J. C. Field. 2 vols. (Arthurian Studies 80.) Cambridge, UK, and Rochester, NY: D. S. Brewer, 2013. Pp. xliii, 940 (1); xxxi, 988 (2). $340. ISBN: 978-1-84384-314-6. doi:10.1086/686493.

Sir Thomas Malory, Le Morte Darthur, ed. P. J. C. Field. 2 vols. (Arthurian Studies 80.) Cambridge, UK, and Rochester, NY: D. S. Brewer, 2013. Pp. xliii, 940 (1); xxxi, 988 (2). $340. ISBN: 978-1-84384-314-6. doi:10.1086/686493.

Great! Thank you. (That original price, though.)

01.09.2025 19:12 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

(Sorry to revive an old thread.) Can you recommend a recent edition of the book that is not modernized? It seems harder to find than I expected.

01.09.2025 18:45 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
AMS :: News from the AMS

www.ams.org/news?news_id...

26.08.2025 15:57 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Can you share the name of the article? It sounds interesting!

08.08.2025 21:24 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

@andrescaicedo01 is following 20 prominent accounts