The vast majority of possible image misconduct that I see in scholarly publishing is in Cancer research. This is so depressing. Here are two papers with duplicated images.
youtu.be/kdT0XMx-Mro
pubpeer.com/publications...
@kaveh1000.bsky.social
● Vision: Accelerating the communication of research ● Research Integrity (https://bit.ly/R2R_video_2024) ● 3rd generation peer review platform ● Open Science, Open Research, Open formats ● RiverValley.io ● https://www.linkedin.com/in/bazargankaveh/
The vast majority of possible image misconduct that I see in scholarly publishing is in Cancer research. This is so depressing. Here are two papers with duplicated images.
youtu.be/kdT0XMx-Mro
pubpeer.com/publications...
This is a problem in publishing, with a particular relevance to Humanities and Social Sciences. We are working on solving the problem and ensuring authors get credit for their work.
02.03.2026 08:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
@mumumouse2.bsky.social has been finding a lot of cases of identical XRD plots in the same chart and across different papers. Here are 4 papers using the same plot.
youtu.be/NAXSlpha0kM
pubpeer.com/publications...
Satisfying but depressing at the same time. What hope is there for the communication of scientific research?
Found by @sholtodavid.bsky.social
pubpeer.com/publications...
Surprising similarity between curves
pubpeer.com/publications...
This is a problem. The solution is to embed digital "provenance" in all content. This is possible and we and others are working on it. I have discussed this with some of your colleagues.
01.03.2026 09:51 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Identical XRD spectra apart from a tiny difference.
pubpeer.com/publications...
I just noticed that in a second response they have admitted a duplication!
27.02.2026 21:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Author: "After carefully check of the results, we are sure that they were different WB bands from different experiments"
What do you think folks?
pubpeer.com/publications...
The tick marks on the author names on the PubPeer page shows all received notifications and can respond, but not holding my breath!
23.02.2026 17:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Thanks for making so much work for me @mumumouse2.bsky.social 😡
5 papers with identical plots!
pubpeer.com/publications...
Almost a duplication but not quite.
pubpeer.com/publications...
ChatGPT is taking ages to write my response to you. Will come back shortly. ;-)
23.02.2026 15:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Another incontrovertible find by @mumumouse2.bsky.social
Feel a bit sorry for the publisher who is punished for publishing a hi res image! Why are images in papers such low resolution??
pubpeer.com/publications...
Interested to see author's response to this duplication found by @elisabethbik.bsky.social
pubpeer.com/publications...
Thanks. I am sure they are more. Feel free to add it to pubpeer.
22.02.2026 16:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Depressing that a huge proportion of image misconduct is in Cancer research.
Paper published 20 years back. Clear signs of Photoshop. First reports on PubPeer was 2024. @grumpygasbag.bsky.social pointed to more problems. I have just done another animation based on that.
pubpeer.com/publications...
Author: "A portion of this micrograph has been modified in order to obtain a nicer image."
pubpeer.com/publications...
Thank you for seeing these in the first place! And thank you for your bravery against the countless personal attacks.
22.02.2026 08:48 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Author: "We respectfully disagree with the interpretation that the highlighted regions represent duplicated areas."
pubpeer.com/publications...
Found by @elisabethbik.bsky.social
Found by @elisabethbik.bsky.social
21.02.2026 23:17 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Author:
"The regions highlighted by ImageTwin likely reflect similarities introduced by grid or imaging artifacts during data acquisition rather than data manipulation."
pubpeer.com/publications...
Found by the inimitable @mumumouse2.bsky.social BTW
21.02.2026 22:23 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Mysterious similarities in XRD graphs
pubpeer.com/publications...
And multicoloured too. 😀
21.02.2026 18:12 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It a good excuse to say hi! 😀
21.02.2026 18:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hi Clare. Is this open to anyone? I have tried to register and seem to be going round in circles – criticism of me, not AUP!!
21.02.2026 14:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
I was kindly asked by @alpsp.bsky.social to create an educational video on XML in scholarly publishing. I was more than happy to do so and decided to use some analogies to make it more accessible. Any comments on how to improve it would be welcome.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=98pu...
Images suspiciously edited. Waiting 5 years for explanation from authors.
pubpeer.com/publications...
So depressing. Im image misconduct I think the biggest area of cheats is cancer research.
21.02.2026 11:17 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0