The OOPSLA 2025 RC chairs, @shriram.bsky.social and Sukyoung Ryu, required some submitting authors to agree to review. Their new blog post describes the policy and its outcomes this year. blog.sigplan.org/2025/09/09/t...
09.09.2025 16:04 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 1
Are you ready for PLDI next week? The best part about it is seeing old friends π― and making new ones! But how will your friends know you are going? Let them know by making a post using the #pldi25 tag or mentioning us @sigplan-pldi.bsky.social π
12.06.2025 17:43 β
π 0
π 1
π¬ 0
π 1
Current Continuation
Weβve started a podcast! @awsto.bsky.social and @samps.phd host βCurrent Continuation,β a little interview series with PL researchers. The first two episodes are with @ranjitjhala.bsky.social and @satnam6502.bsky.social. sigplan.org/cc/
02.06.2025 15:19 β
π 24
π 11
π¬ 2
π 0
YouTube video by current continuation
E1: Ranjit Jhala (UCSD)
As part of SIGPLAN blog, @samps.phd (Cornell) and I started an interview series where we talk to luminaries in the field of Programming Languages. Our first one is a super fun conversation with Ranjit Jhala (UCSD). 1h26m of goodness. www.youtube.com/watch?v=goUZ...
21.05.2025 15:20 β
π 24
π 9
π¬ 1
π 1
After a long hiatus, SIGPLAN Research Highlights are back!
The highlights committee[*] is thrilled to announce four exceptional PL papers from 2021-2023 awarded in this round! β
[*] Azalea Raad, Stephen Kell, Mike Bond and Erez Petrank, @natefoster.bsky.social, @lorisdanto.bsky.social, and me.
24.02.2025 14:10 β
π 21
π 8
π¬ 2
π 2
Parametric Subtyping for Structural Parametric Polymorphism
Recursive types, generics (sometimes called parametric polymorphism), and subtyping are all essential features for modern programming languages across numerous paradigms. However, structural subtypβ¦
Generics, recursive types, and structural subtyping are all features that many modern languages want, but their combination can quickly get unwieldy. A POPL Distinguished Paper from last year distilled a decidable type system that combines all three. blog.sigplan.org/2025/01/29/p...
29.01.2025 16:22 β
π 9
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
Are we still doing βBluesky has the juiceβ? @sigplan-pldi.bsky.social is hereβfollow for all your design and/or implementation needs.
26.01.2025 15:15 β
π 6
π 2
π¬ 1
π 0
I just found out that @sigplan.bsky.social collects open-access links to SIGPLAN proceedings all together in one place: sigplan.org/OpenTOC/. Probably worth bookmarking!
16.12.2024 16:04 β
π 6
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
Evaluating Human Factors Beyond Lines of Code
Software systems researchers want to make human-centered claims, but donβt have the proper tools to do so. Thatβs how we ended up with the ubiquitous lines-of-code comparison found in eβ¦
PL researchers often want to claim that something is βusable,β βintuitive,β βeasy to reason about,β etc. But how should we examine these claims without full-blown user studies? @tonofcrates.bsky.social has advice. blog.sigplan.org/2024/11/21/e...
25.11.2024 15:30 β
π 8
π 0
π¬ 0
π 1
the SIGPLAN information director has determined that the set of accounts belonging to the SIG is the more important βsource of truthβ compared the set of accounts open on a given social network. so this setup, while symmetric with the proposed dual formulation, communicates the idea most clearly
24.11.2024 01:43 β
π 4
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
the SIGPLAN information director considered a slate of jokes based on proof systems but declined them all in favor of this validity-based joke. a full report will be presented at the business meeting
24.11.2024 01:03 β
π 9
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
couldn't think of a way to make a good typing judgment joke, so here we are
23.11.2024 19:54 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
β¨ bluesky β accounts(sigplan)
23.11.2024 19:37 β
π 39
π 8
π¬ 1
π 1